Californian ups drivers one week from now what are you delivering? my guess would be mags and well more mags
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Offer valid until 9/23! If you have an annual subscription on Sniper's Hide, subscribe below and you'll be refunded the difference.
SubscribeWhat legal authority could the state rely on to prohibit the sale of a good that is legal to possess?
Oh no, the communists will for this even if shot down by scotus. Gun rights are a impediment to their agenda, and they want us as unarmed and compliant as possible. Never ever let up the pressure in getting rid of these treasonous laws. Personally those who wrote this law should be thrown in gitmo for life.This is just the appeal after last years ruling correct? Are they going to try to go to supreme with it or is CA gonna throw in the towel?
If Congress has direct authority to regulate under the commerce clause, it cannot do so in a manner that would be inconsistent with other constitutional principles, like the second amendment. The ruling discussed in this thread decided that possession of the magazines at issue is a fundamental right and an outright ban does not pass muster under strict scrutiny (ETA or intermediate scrutiny for that matter). Don't see how any argument could be made that an outright prohibition on the sale of the magazines at issue would be treated any differently under the commerce clause or whatever other twisted mental gymnastics you could do to argue that an outright ban on the sale of the magazines at issue is not violative of the natural rights memorialized in the second amendment.
You need to read the brief. Your example is explicitly called out as not being an example of long standing, specifically because if it's outlawed, one can't say what bearing it has. Specifically a law outlawing something can not be used as validation of something as being not "in common use", since it's outlawed. That is established law and precedent."In Common Use" is also a great way to get rid of firearms. Our government doesn't consider the military to be The People in court cases that I've ever known of. If machineguns came up in court again, they could say they may be banned because they are not in common use - because the court made them almost impossible to acquire. They could ban silencers for the same reason; they could say "only X% of gun owners use silencers" - directly grounded in the courts already making suppressors incredibly difficult to acquire and own.
I hope it works out for you.I was able to place my magazine order , whether or not they get shipped is another story. This is a big win for us behind enemy lines.
NRA can still suck my dick.Sorry, I couldn't help it.
Good to know!You need to read the brief. Your example is explicitly called out as not being an example of long standing, specifically because if it's outlawed, one can't say what bearing it has. Specifically a law outlawing something can not be used as validation of something is not "in common use", since it's outlawed. That is established law and precedent.
People need to take the time and read the ruling....
The bolded text above could be one of the most idiotic sentences I've had the displeasure of reading.
Using that logic, no "final order" any judge entered would ever be a "final order" until it was granted cert and ruled on by SCOTUS or the time for an appeal had run and none of the grounds for an out of time appeal existed.
Fixed it for you...Good to know!
I don’t readpro-gun rulings in California. They only stand for a week.
which could happen here as well but the key word is could
they would have to file a motion asking for a stay pending appeal and then it would have to be granted before it would be in effect
the order is the order until something changes that
I heard one distributor was selling 4000 magazines per MINUTE!!! (60K/hr) which was still less than the peak of 100k/hr during 2016. But keep in mind, in 2016 it was mostly distributed nationally where as I'd have to believe that now it's the majority of sales to Californians getting the rights back.
In Texas alot of noobs come to a range with benches to site in thier new ar's .
They quickly find out the downfall of a 30 rounder for that purpose.
Seems I always loose a couple per year.
If they go on sale I will buy extras to keep in pkg to sell at range to help out the noobs if range doesn't have any..
Your secret is safe with me for a nominal fee.Wait, were not supposed to have 10+ mags here? I had no idea.
View attachment 7398807
Man I hope this applies to my neighbors in New Jersey . Fuck Phil Murphy . Balls n all , tonsil lockin , no gag reflex , Commie traitor , striated man sphinter lickin , toilet bowl brush squatin , douche fuckin bag .
Yes. Stingers and TOWs are man portable and would be covered."Current" is the key word.
Freedom of speech applies to the television speech also.
Sure?
If the number of boating accidents reported were actually real? You would be able to walk to Japan without getting your feet wet. In addition to being well armed when you got there.View attachment 7399642Amazing.... If they’re lucky they’ll find some boating accident with a floating Ma-deuce and armory of floating 240 Bravo’s...
Always works that way on a win for the 2nd.I think the ruling should go into effect.
If some ass appeals it they can deal with it then, not infringe people now.
Or...let’em come. Grrrrrrr...Us law abiding conservatives.
Communists see light under the edge of the tent they bring the camel inside.
Conservatives "Ummm, Im not sure yet, let's wait and see...."
Or...let’em come. Grrrrrrr...
I think whoever drafted and supported these gun control laws should be dragged into gitmo.I think the ruling should go into effect.
If some ass appeals it they can deal with it then, not infringe people now.