• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

thebolt

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Apr 15, 2006
171
77
Colorado
05/05/2010
<span style="font-weight: bold">
Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial</span>
Preventing juvenile mass murder in American schools is the job of police officers, school teachers, and concerned parents
“How many kids have been killed by school fire in all of North America in the past 50 years? Kids killed... school fire... North America... 50 years... How many? Zero. That’s right. Not one single kid has been killed by school fire anywhere in North America in the past half a century. Now, how many kids have been killed by school violence?”
So began an extraordinary daylong seminar presented by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, a Pulitzer Prize nominated author, West Point psychology professor, and without a doubt the world’s foremost expert on human aggression and violence. The event, hosted by the California Peace Officers Association, was held in the auditorium of a very large community church about 30 miles from San Francisco, and was attended by more than 250 police officers from around the region.
Grossman’s talk spanned myriad topics of vital importance to law enforcement, such as the use of autogenic breathing, surviving gunshot wounds, dealing with survivor guilt following a gun battle, and others. In coming months, I will present a series of articles addressing many of these subjects, but violence among and against children was how the day began, and so it is in this area I will begin my coverage...
“In 1998,” Grossman said, “school violence claimed what at the time was an all time record number of kids’ lives. In that year there were 35 dead and a quarter of a million serious injuries due to violence in the school. How many killed by fire that year? Zero. But we hear people say, ‘That’s the year Columbine happened, that’s an anomaly.’ Well, in 2004 we had a new all time record — 48 dead in the schools from violence. How many killed by fire that year? Zero. Let’s assign some grades. Put your teacher hat on and give out some grades. What kind of grade do you give the firefighter for keeping kids safe? An ‘A,’ right? Reluctantly, reluctantly, the cops give the firefighters an ‘A,’ right? Danged firefighters, they sleep ‘till they’re hungry and eat ‘till they’re tired. What grade do we get for keeping the kids safe from violence? Come on, what’s our grade? Needs improvement, right?”
Johnny Firefighter, A+ Student
“Why can’t we be like little Johnny Firefighter?” Grossman asked as he prowled the stage. “He’s our A+ student!”
He paused, briefly, and answered with a voice that blew through the hall like thunder, “Denial, denial, denial!”
Grossman commanded, “Look up at the ceiling! See all those sprinklers up there? They’re hard to spot — they’re painted black — but they’re there. While you’re looking, look at the material the ceiling is made of. You know that that stuff was selected because it’s fire-retardant. Hooah? Now look over there above the door — you see that fire exit sign? That’s not just any fire exit sign — that’s a ‘battery-backup-when-the-world-ends-it-will-still-be-lit’ fire exit sign. Hooah?”
Walking from the stage toward a nearby fire exit and exterior wall, Grossman slammed the palm of his hand against the wall and exclaimed, “Look at these wall boards! They were chosen because they’re what?! Fireproof or fire retardant, hooah? There is not one stinking thing in this room that will burn!”
Pointing around the room as he spoke, Grossman continued, “But you’ve still got those fire sprinklers, those fire exit signs, fire hydrants outside, and fire trucks nearby! Are these fire guys crazy? Are these fire guys paranoid? NO! This fire guy is our A+ student! Because this fire guy has redundant, overlapping layers of protection, not a single kid has been killed by school fire in the last 50 years!
“But you try to prepare for violence — the thing much more likely to kill our kids in schools, the thing hundreds of times more likely to kill our kids in schools — and people think you’re paranoid. They think you’re crazy. ...They’re in denial.”
Teaching the Teachers
The challenge for law enforcement agencies and officers, then, is to overcome not only the attacks taking place in schools, but to first overcome the denial in the minds of mayors, city councils, school administrators, and parents. Grossman said that agencies and officers, although facing an uphill slog against the denial of the general public, must diligently work toward increasing understanding among the sheep that the wolves are coming for their children. Police officers must train and drill with teachers, not only so responding officers are intimately familiar with the facilities, but so that teachers know what they can do in the event of an attack.
“Come with me to the library at Columbine High School,” Grossman said. “The teacher in the library at Columbine High School spent her professional lifetime preparing for a fire, and we can all agree if there had been a fire in that library, that teacher would have instinctively, reflexively known what to do. But the thing most likely to kill her kids — the thing hundreds of times more likely to kill her kids, the teacher didn’t have a clue what to do. She should have put those kids in the librarian’s office but she didn’t know that. So she did the worst thing possible — she tried to secure her kids in an un-securable location. She told the kids to hide in the library — a library that has plate glass windows for walls. It’s an aquarium, it’s a fish bowl. She told the kids to hide in a fishbowl. What did those killers see? They saw targets. They saw fish in a fish bowl.”
Grossman said that if the school administrators at Columbine had spent a fraction of the money they’d spent preparing for fire — if the teachers there had spent a fraction of the time they spent preparing for fire — doing lockdown drills and talking with local law enforcers about the violent dangers they face, the outcome that day may have been different.
Rhetorically he asked the assembled cops, “If somebody had spent five minutes telling that teacher what to do, do you think lives would have been saved at Columbine?”
Arming Campus Cops is Elementary
Nearly two years ago, I wrote an article called Arming campus cops is elementary. Not surprisingly, Grossman agrees with that hypothesis.
“Never call an unarmed man ‘security’,” Grossman said.
“Call him ‘run-like-hell-when-the-man-with-the-gun-shows-up’ but never call an unarmed man security. Imagine if someone said, ‘I want a trained fire professional on site. I want a fire hat, I want a fire uniform, I want a fire badge. But! No fire extinguishers in this building. No fire hoses. The hat, the badge, the uniform — that will keep us safe — but we have no need for fire extinguishers.’ Well, that would be insane. It is equally insane, delusional, legally liable, to say, ‘I want a trained security professional on site. I want a security hat, I want a security uniform, and I want a security badge, but I don’t want a gun.’ It’s not the hat, the uniform, or the badge. It’s the tools in the hands of a trained professional that keeps us safe.
“Our problem is not money,” said Grossman. “It is denial.”
Grossman said (and most cops agree) that many of the most important things we can do to protect our kids would cost us nothing or next-to-nothing.
Grossman’s Five D’s
In the next installment of this series, I will explore what follows in much greater detail, but for now, let’s contemplate the following outline and summary of Dave Grossman’s “Five D’s.” While you do, I encourage you to add in the comments area below your suggestions to address, and expand upon, these ideas.
1. Denial — Denial is the enemy and it has no survival value, said Grossman.
2. Deter — Put police officers in schools, because with just one officer assigned to a school, the probability of a mass murder in that school drops to almost zero
3. Detect — We’re talking about plain old fashioned police work here. The ultimate achievement for law enforcement is the crime that didn’t happen, so giving teachers and administrators regular access to cops is paramount.
4. Delay — Various simple mechanisms can be used by teachers and cops to put time and distance between the killers and the kids.
a. Ensure that the school/classroom have just a single point of entry. Simply locking the back door helps create a hard target.
b. Conduct your active shooter drills within (and in partnership with) the schools in your city so teachers know how to respond, and know what it looks like when you do your response.
5. Destroy — Police officers and agencies should consider the following:
a. Carry off duty. No one would tell a firefighter who has a fire extinguisher in his trunk that he’s crazy or paranoid.
b. Equip every cop in America with a patrol rifle. One chief of police, upon getting rifles for all his officers once said, “If an active killer strikes in my town, the response time will be measured in feet per second.”
c. Put smoke grenades in the trunk of every cop car in America. Any infantryman who needs to attack across open terrain or perform a rescue under fire deploys a smoke grenade. A fire extinguisher will do a decent job in some cases, but a smoke grenade is designed to perform the function.
d. Have a “go-to-war bag” filled with lots of loaded magazines and supplies for tactical combat casualty care.
e. Use helicopters. Somewhere in your county you probably have one or more of the following: medivac, media, private, national guard, coast guard rotors.
f. Employ the crew-served, continuous-feed, weapon you already have available to you (a firehouse) by integrating the fire service into your active shooter training. It is virtually impossible for a killer to put well-placed shots on target while also being blasted with water at 300 pounds per square inch.
g. Armed citizens can help. Think United 93. Whatever your personal take on gun control, it is all but certain that a killer set on killing is more likely to attack a target where the citizens are unarmed, rather than one where they are likely to encounter an armed citizen response.
Coming Soon: External Threats
Today we must not only prepare for juvenile mass murder, something that had never happened in human history until only recently, but we also must prepare for the external threat. Islamist fanatics have slaughtered children in their own religion — they have killed wantonly, mercilessly, and without regard for repercussion or regret of any kind. What do you think they’d think of killing our kids?
“Eight years ago they came and killed 3,000 of our citizens. Do we know what they’re going to do next? No! But one thing they’ve done in every country they’ve messed with is killing kids in schools.”
The latest al Qaeda charter states that “children are noble targets” and Osama bin Laden himself has said that “Russia is a preview for what we will do to America.”
What happened in Russia that we need to be concerned with in this context? In the town of Beslan on September 1, 2004 — the very day on which children across that country merrily make their return to school after the long summer break — radical Islamist terrorists from Chechnya took more than 1,000 teachers, mothers, and children hostage. When the three-day siege was over, more than 300 hostages had been killed, more than half of whom were children.
“If I could tackle every American and make them read one book to help them understand the terrorist’s plan, it would be Terror at Beslan by John Giduck. Beslan was just a dress rehearsal for what they’re planning to do to the United States.”
A future feature will focus solely on the issue of the terror threats against American schools, but for the time being consider this: There are almost a half a million school busses in America — it would require every enlisted person and every officer in the entire Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps combined to put just one armed guard on every school bus in the country.
As a country and as a culture, the level of protection Americans afford our kids against violence is nothing near what we do to protect them from fire. Grossman is correct: Denial is the enemy. We must prepare for violence like the firefighter prepares for fire. And we must do that today.
Hooah, Colonel!

The Enemy is Denial-Policeone Link
 
Re: Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

Quite prophetic. To bad so many have to blame the arrow not the indian in situations where these types of tragedies happen and don't look at real ways to prevent them.
 
Re: Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

Well, I'm no colonel, but I have been around the block. He got at least three things fundamentally wrong, and the first here is critical:

4. I fully agree with "delay", except a few points need to be addressed. See, as a security expert (I've held licenses in multiple states, done plenty of high profile jobs) I've never put adequate security in any school. They don't have the budget for it, especially when you factor in fire codes. Locking the back door is great, you can lock the front one too. You only need failsafe on the lock in order to have it meet fire codes. As I understand, this school had that installed already. But a detail I think not being mentioned is that he would have easily had access to the key (the card, actual key, etc.) because his mother worked there and he killed her. You need biometrics to stop this, again, out of the budget.

Also the entire architectural structure of the building needs to be examined. I have ideas here, but I'm no architect.

Once adequate delay has been addressed, response FROM INSIDE can be addressed for the first time. Then you CAN have a locked weapons cage, say double biometric, that requires two people. Just like nukes. The individuals with access would have adequate training. Arming teachers is stupid.

Who does have all this kind of shit you might ask? Prisons. And they house something like 80% drug or non-violent offenders. They have the budgets, the security, the architecture, and it all meets fire codes (PS, many of your schools don't meet fire codes as it is, high voltage or low voltage, I've had to rewire plenty of shit due to this in the past). WANNA PROTECT YOUR KIDS? UNFUCK THIS FIRST!

5c. Having been infantry, popping smoke by one or two guys can hinder the full response, particularly in fog and still air where it will linger (or in open areas where it will clear and dissipate before really providing any concealment). It is only appropriate, in my opinion, for a tactical, ie, a thought out, planned response by professionals (who usually won't be the first responders either). Also, in my practice, the only smoke that makes enough to cover is WP and that stuff is too nasty to issue to everyone. The other crap just works for signal IMO. I guess it can hinder a shot, but it never did me, not just two or three smokes, not in the open. Keeping smoke in the trunk is fine for tacticool, but it isn't going to help stop these crimes.

In addition, those kids would have been all dead by the time dude popped smoke and IMT'd up to the door, plus these shooters aren't interested in a response. Also, there was a response, a very damn fast one from what I understand, but it was still too late (he wasn't delayed). When a guy walks in and shoots, it is over when he runs out of ammo and whacks himself, or someone shoots him down. Most of you know that. What the first responders did was correct --rush right into the line of fire to save those kids because seconds count. And even then they were too late.

COPS ARE NOT INFANTRYMEN. Stop thinking that supplying them as such will solve anything. Did you not see the cops at the school? They had more shit than some units in Afghan. Most of those cops HAD AR's, nice ones with suppressors too, so that isn't much of an issue unless they don't have one.

And if infantrymen are the answer, how about deputizing my ass and unshackling me from opening fire and give me immunity from accidental bystander casualties? I know a VA full of guys that can pull this shit off, perfectly sane, perfectly good Americans, many what you call "heroes" already. I personally carry everyday (I also have M4's and shitloads of ammo and more high caps than I can count, I may have a smoke or two somewhere, I don't know, but for some reason, I have no desire to use any of it on any person or non-food animal --ever). As it stands, we have pretty liberal state laws concerning this here, I am allowed to draw to stop a felony in progress, that is the letter of the law. But I know that on CC forums, many guys WILL NOT draw to protect anyone but themselves, even in this state but especially in ones that don't have that kind of language. For instance, the Tacoma mall shooter? He took return fire. It wasn't successful, but it was an effort to thwart a bigger body count. Many CC'ers feel when shit goes off, it is everyone for themselves. That is because if they draw, shoot at the bad guy and miss like those cops in NY did, they will go to prison as a felon instead of home as a hero.

I feel it is prudent to bring that up because "more guns is the answer" is about as useless as "less guns are the answer". That is like trying to divide 1 by zero and get a useful number.

5f. The firehose is asinine. They have a different job. Stop trying to make every public worker an infantryman. Besides, which situation would that have been appropriate in?

The rest of it I either agree with, or they already did it (like commandeer the helicopters, the cop said on day one that he took many of them). I mentioned deter already, by placing a cop car at each school, but again, they are busy with non-violent offenders and processing little Johnny from the high school for his first drug possession felony instead of "serving or protecting" anything.

Not to sound like I'm on a high horse here, but I know what the fuck I'm talking about and I just gave you the answers to protect your kids. I don't have kids, but I value yours just the same as they are not only THE future but will affect mine as well when I'm old, plus this hurts me deeply too even if I'm too thick skinned to show it. What hurts me more is that it will be politicized and we'll get gun bans instead of the shit I mentioned above, and this will happen over and over and over...

Like I said before, ANTS protect their young better than we do. And it does take a community, I think you are all figuring that out right now.

Finally, bad shit happens. My neighbor's house burned to the ground last night and my first knowledge of it was the sirens. Usually, the first sign of a shooter is, well, the shooting. So focus on delay, but to do that, focus on budget, and to do that, focus on ending the drug war and prison industrial complex. That sector has all the funding, security etc. to turn schools into castle keeps. You could defund TSA too, but it would be useless to reroute resources as they are useless --the prison industrial complex is geared to turn schools into castles, just like GM was to build tanks in WW2.

Read it or not, laugh it off, I don't care. It won't be my kid in the next shooting, but it could be one of yours.
 
Re: Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

Secret Service’s Safe School Initiatives. A study on School Shootings.

THE FINAL REPORT AND FINDINGS OF THE SAFE SCHOOL INITIATIVE: This document is starting to make the rounds through the internet, but do not expect to see it mentioned in the news anytime soon.

The Safe School Initiative was implemented through the Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center and the Department of Education’s Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program. The Initiative drew from the Secret Service’s experience in studying and preventing assassination and other types of targeted violence and the Department of Education’s expertise in helping schools facilitate learning through the creation of safe environments for students, faculty, and staff.
...
It makes for a very interesting reading, specially when you hit page 37:

Despite prompt law enforcement responses, most attacks were stopped by means other than law enforcement intervention…. The fact that it was not through law enforcement intervention that most of the targeted school violence incidents studied were stopped appears in large part to be a function of how brief most of these incidents were in duration.

And if we take a quick jump to the findings we get:

Key Finding 10
Despite prompt law enforcement responses, most attacks were stopped by means other than law enforcement inter vention and most were brief in duration.

Implications
The short duration of most incidents of targeted school violence argues for the importance of developing preventive measures in addition to any emergency planning for a school or school district. The preventive measures should include protocols and procedures for responding to and managing threats and other behaviors of concern.

One can see politics rearing its unsightly rear end here. Key Findings 1 through 9 deal with the importance of proper vigilance and prevention which are very good and must be used because anything that reduces the chances of something from ever happening has to be encouraged. But when Finding 1 through 9 fail and the shooter is on the school grounds, you don’t go back and recheck what cue you missed on the shooter’s profile but go to direct action to stop the attacker. After all, the Secret Service Presidential detail do not carry file folders under their jackets, they carry guns to stop any assassin from taking the President’s life.

As the Secret Service painfully knows, it is impossible to catch all the crazies out there before they act. Sometimes your only option is to react forcefully and with deadly force.

PS: I did forget to mention, the report is from May 2002. It is up to you to do the math.

Here is the link to the full report: http://gunfreezone.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Safe-School-Initiative_final_report.pdf
 
Re: Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Intrepid4576</div><div class="ubbcode-body">strykervet thanks for sharing i agree with everything you said - makes sense to me</div></div>

No problem, everyone gets caught up in this and "more guns and less guns" at this point isn't the answer. They are here and aren't going anywhere --Pandora's Box-- Greek myths tell stories for the ages for a reason. Nobody brings up or illustrates the problems, failures or solutions.

Considering I'm the only one preaching this and pretty much feel alone, I doubt it'll go anywhere. I did write the president, first time ever, to tell him the fallacies of both sides and what needs to be done though.

I'm not always an expert, but here I'm a fucking shining headlight with no deer in the road --nobody to listen to me. My old company did contact me wanting me to come back though, so perhaps business is up --I haven't been able to work a job since 2007 at least.

I just don't want to see more schools get shot up.

Also, their current lockdown procedures make them deathtraps. These places don't even have basic fences, the most basic of obstacle that can easily be alarmed.

School shooting happened at my school in the 80's. We got nice little signs that upped the penalty. That upped anty and sparked more violence.

We are all gonna fail with this one.
 
Re: Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

Thanks for posting this. I read it awhile back and seeing it again made me think about how solutions like this would work if more people read them.
 
Re: Active shooters in schools: The enemy is denial

Here is a small sampling of what some of the College Student Handbook's of a couple different universities have to say about dealing with active shooters:

Just a sampling, and certainly not comprehensive…

Witchita State University: If the person(s) is causing death or serious physical injury to others and you are unable to run or hide you may choose to be compliant, play dead, or fight for your life.

University of Miami: When all else fails, students should act as aggressively as possible against a shooter. Throwing items and other improvised weapons, as well as yelling should be considered.

Otterbein University: Breath to manage your fear. You may have to take the offensive if the shooter(s) enter your area. Gather weapons (pens, pencils, books, chairs, etc.) and mentally prepare your attack.

West Virginia University: If the situation is dire, students should act with physical aggression and throw items at the active shooter. These items could include student desks, keys, shoes, belts, books, cell phones, iPods, book bags, laptops, pens pencils, etc.

University of Colorado: You and classmates or friends may find yourselves in a situation where the shooter will accost you. If such an event occurs, quickly develop a plan to attack the shooter…Consider a plan to tackle the shooter, take away his weapon, and hold him until police arrive.