• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Alberta OFFICIALLY takes firm stance refusing to comply with Trudeau gun ban. Constitutional jurisdiction enforced by provincial lawmakers.

Blue Sky Country

Urban Cowboy
Full Member
Minuteman
  • December 2022

    Alberta's provincial lawmakers, including it's division of firearms safety, prosecution of firearm crimes, and advocate for lawful firearms ownership, has announced an OFFICIAL stance in direct rejection of Justin Trudeau's unlawful gun ban decree earlier this year which virtually outlaws almost all semiautomatic and magazine-fed hunting rifles, including historical arms such as the Lee Enfield line of bolt action rifles and M1 Garands from civilian ownership. Also outlawed in Trudeau's coup-style decree are revolvers and semiauto handguns, weapons that are used by lawful citizens to protect themselves and their families from society's violent and predatory elements. Starting January 1, 2023, Alberta's own provincial Crown Prosecution Service, which handles firearm crime as well as are defenders of the province's long standing culture of gun ownership, hunting, living history reenactment, and sportsmanship, will take over the province's handling of all firearms related manners. Trudeau's edicts will have absolutely no standing in Alberta. In the words of the representatives and officials within Alberta's provincial government:

    -----------
    -----------
    “As government, we do all we can to ensure the safety of Albertans. The federal government’s firearm ban does not stop illegal guns from crossing the border and making it into the hands of criminals. Instead of targeting criminals, the ban targets law-abiding firearms owners. Taking back Alberta’s constitutional jurisdiction and the authority to handle charges under the Firearms Act is one more way our province is pushing back against federal overreach.”

    Danielle Smith, Premier

    -----------
    -----------

    “Alberta has the expertise and the ability to handle Firearms Act matters. By taking back our constitutional jurisdiction, we are not only asserting Alberta’s rightful place in Confederation but also better serving Alberta’s law-abiding firearms community. Most importantly, Alberta can ensure that resources can be prioritized to go after violent and repeat offenders – not otherwise law-abiding Albertans.”

    Tyler Shandro, Minister of Justice

    -----------
    -----------

    “Alberta already administers firearms legislation through my office. Having provincial jurisdiction to handle firearms offences makes sense and is in the best interests of Albertans’ rights and safety.”

    Teri Bryant, chief firearms officer

    Alberta’s Chief Firearms Office administers federal firearms legislation, advocates for Alberta’s lawful firearms owners and promotes public safety.

    -----------
    -----------


    Resources:




    FIREARMS OWNERSHIP IS THE ONLY QUALIFYING DEFINITION THAT SEPARATES A TRUE FREE STATE FROM ALL OTHERS.

    There are NO other qualifying definitions that make a society free except the ownership of firearms by the citizenry. Throughout history, the owning and carrying of firearms represent franchise, individual identity, individual responsibility, independence, and the ability to resist predatory social movements such as communism and religious fanaticism through lethal force and immediate neutralization of a threat. Handguns represent an even stronger aspect of this individual franchise and self responsibility by ensuring their owners and carriers a means of easily deployable and extremely effective defense against criminal elements of society in a wide variety of predatory types ranging from the common mugger and assailant, to rapists, psychopathic thrill killers, and extremists bent on using terror and mass murder to achieve political or selfish goals. It is the ability to responsibly wield and use this deterrence when needed, that separates a truly free citizen from a defenseless slave and subject.

    You can have a hypothetical "free" society where EVERYTHING from drugs, vehicles, pop culture, dress, literature and entertainment, careers and industries, are free and legal to pursue, BUT, if civilian firearm ownership is not included, this hypothetical society is still not free. Far from it actually. That is because firearms ownership and the ability to defend and assert sovereignty through force, is the BASIS of ALL freedoms. Without this ability, EVERYTHING are mere privileges that can be revoked or changed at will by the governing entity, and without the ability to assert force, all the citzenry have against state overreach is useless complaints and bleating, which can simply be ignored by the state. The ability of the citizenry to own the same force which the state employs to assert it's will, and exert this force when necessary, is the ONLY thing which keeps all potential overreach in check.

    There is NO way any society can deem itself truly "free", unless the civilian population can legally own and wield the same manner of personal small arms in use by current military and police forces in defense of their own lives and livelihoods. Otherwise, do not even try to call yourselves a "free state", because without individual franchise in the form of weapon ownership, everything is a mere privilege.
     
    Alberta has a very storied history. Some long past, and some quite recent.

    It was a town in Alberta that was evacuated due to flooding, and the Federal officers went and broke in to every residence that was REGISTERED to have firearms. And ALL of those firearms were confiscated. And yes, they had lists, so they continued going into the houses, and continued searching all-over-and-through-everything until each and every listed firearm in that residence was found and taken. Then, and only then, they left and went and kicked in the next home on the list. (something like 8-10 years ago)

    Freedom, eh? That's what they're calling this now?

    My grandfathers fought the nazi's in WWII. In doing so, they were entitled to 'bring back' certain firearms. Those have in one manner or another, entered the legal firearm trade market. And now those firearms are being deemed 'prohibited' by our current Punk Martinet.

    That alone, kinda makes the efforts and sacrifices of our soldiers moot and irrelevant, don't you think? This once was a country built OF people, FOR people, and BY people. It is now a country being destroyed from the inside BY a dilettante.

    I could say more, but I'll leave it alone for now.
     
    Alberta has a very storied history. Some long past, and some quite recent.

    It was a town in Alberta that was evacuated due to flooding, and the Federal officers went and broke in to every residence that was REGISTERED to have firearms. And ALL of those firearms were confiscated. And yes, they had lists, so they continued going into the houses, and continued searching all-over-and-through-everything until each and every listed firearm in that residence was found and taken. Then, and only then, they left and went and kicked in the next home on the list. (something like 8-10 years ago)

    Freedom, eh? That's what they're calling this now?

    My grandfathers fought the nazi's in WWII. In doing so, they were entitled to 'bring back' certain firearms. Those have in one manner or another, entered the legal firearm trade market. And now those firearms are being deemed 'prohibited' by our current Punk Martinet.

    That alone, kinda makes the efforts and sacrifices of our soldiers moot and irrelevant, don't you think? This once was a country built OF people, FOR people, and BY people. It is now a country being destroyed from the inside BY a dilettante.

    I could say more, but I'll leave it alone for now.


    I see any attempt to register firearms as the same as a stranger asking a person questions about how much valuables and cash they have at home and what time during the day the house is empty and when it is occupied. No difference at all.