Re: benifits of a muzzle brake
I used to be on the side of not getting a muzzle brake (or porting a barrel). Because I always felt if you can't handle the recoil you shouldn't be shooting it anyways. Neither causes velocity loss, BTW.
I have since changed my opinion on that. I got to shoot a .22-250 that a guy had braked. I asked why, for such a small caliber. He said it's not to save me from the recoil, it's to keep the rifle on target. The brake was tuned and clocked.
Since then, I owned an AR-30 with a huge, extremely efficient muzzle brake, in .300 Win mag. Again, the brake was tuned and clocked. In this case especially, it kept the rifle pointing directly where I aimed it. Also, because of it being tuned and clocked counter-acted the force the twist wants to torque the rifle in your grasp.
Many times when I say this, I get the argument that if you drive the rifle right you have no problem seeing the bullet hit. I agree the rifle has to be driven right for accuracy to be accomplished. But, I also found that even when driving the rifle perfectly, the recoil still compresses it into your shoulder and the torque created by the twist wants to make the barrel move off center. If you can reduce that by any measurable piece then I think it's something that should be added if you can. I felt so strongly about it that I put a very effective muzzle brake on my 5.56. There is a noticeable difference in how the rifle reacts during recoil.
My bottom line is get the muzzle brake. But, get a good one and have it tuned and clocked so that it is effective in counter-rotation as well.
<span style="color: #3333FF">Edit:
The drawback for trading recoil is blast. Not just noise, but a pressure wave that wants to come back and wreak havoc on your sinuses. Effectiveness of the brake has a direct correlation to this. I've found a number of shooters who dislike this more than recoil. Not to mention those on the right and left.</span>