Rifle Scopes Binocular range finder suggestions?

Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

pretty much, if you're only shooting out to 1000m you might as well get something a whole lot cheaper and less bulky. But if you had a .50, then the 2500m range the vector IV provides would come in handy.
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

Went to the store and compared the Geovid and Zeiss side by side. Ranged several distances and definitely like the Zeiss better. At least for me, the image quality is better, rubberized coating has a more solid feel, ranging is quicker with just pressing button and letting go, and the range number is easier to read. Now for the most difficult part, the extra cost.
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

I used the Zeiss range finding binoculars for a month side by side with the non-HD Geovid. The Zeiss is brighter, ranges faster, and ranges at much greater distances. The binocular portion is without peer. I had a bit of a problem seeing the display on the Zeiss in bright sunlight, in white sand in the Red Desert, and it took some time to get accustomed to eliminating panoramic tilt.

The Zeiss is all around better, except I had difficulty with the display. I use the 8x42 Geovids and they work fine to the distances I most frequently shoot. If longer yardage, and having the best binocular is your thing...go Zeiss. If money is an issue, the demo Leica's from Doug are a great value for the dollar.
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

Gr8fuldoug, I heard a rumor that the new Leica 1600 Rangefinder display changed from red in low light to black in bright daylight for easier reading.....just wondering if you could confirm this? If so, do you think they will make the same upgrades to the Geovid RF binoculars?

I had the Zeiss 10x45 RF and could not see the display in bright daylight at all really unless looking at something dark colored. The Bushnell fusion actually was quite a bit easier to read for me, as it has adjustable brightness in the menu.
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

I got the Geovid 15x56 HD Demos from cameraland and could not be happier. I regularly range out to 1400yds and the only conditions that have shortened that while out hunting is heavy rain and/or fog. The clarity is amazing, as well.
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

I have used Geovid, Zeiss, and the Swaro. For the price the Zeiss are hard to beat. The Geovid have great glass and are comfortable to use but the cost a lot and the weight to me is an issue. The Swaro are have really nice glass, very comfortable to use, great ranging ability, and are light to me.

Another unit that is out now is the Bushnell Fusion 1600 ARC 10x42 Binocular Laser Rangefinder. I have not used one but the look very promising especial for the price. I will be getting feedback on one really soon.


Mike @ CST
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

I've been very happy with the Geovid HD's I got from Doug last year. I was able to check out the Geovid, Geovid HD and Zeiss RF side by side inside and outside and for me, the glass quality on the Zeiss was a bit better, but for whatever reason I could not hold them as steady as the Geovid's even at the same power. I was also able to compare the Geovid to the Geovid HD and while the difference isn't huge it's at least as big as the difference from the Geovid HD to the zeiss, more in my opinion and the rangefinder in the Geovid HD seemed much better than the older Geovid model.

I can say I switched from hunting with Swarovski EL's and leica 1200 rangefinder to the Geovid HD's and I might have given up just a tiny bit of pure glass quality and light gathering (I went from 8.5x EL's to 10x Geovid HDs), but the convenience of having both in one package and not having to fumble to get out a rangefinder all the time I wouldn't go back to having the two separate again. Expensive yes, but no worse than owning a top pair of binoculars and top rangefinder. Heavier sure, but no worse than the combined weight of the two separate units either.

The two issues that I'd like to see Leica change would be the button placement moved to the right hand side. Bowhunting I frequently rest my bow vertical against my body and rest the binoculars on the top limb for support. Being right handed in those situations my right hand is the only one free and getting to the left side button is possible just not easy. Also I'd liked to have seen them up the brightest display illumination a bit. I had a couple situations in snowy high elevation conditions when trying to range is very bright snowy backgrounds where the displayed range was very hard to see. I could usually read the range it just was not easy or I could shift to a darker area to read it. It sounds like someone else has the same issue with the Zeiss RF so it's not just the Geovid.

Now if they only were all as easy to deal with as Swarovski. I love that company. When I called to ask them about sending in my spotting scope and EL's for a general cleaning/inspection before my big elk hunt they not only did it for free, but they told me they encourage customers to do that once a year for no charge, they consider it part of their warranty service for all customers.
 
Re: Binocular range finder suggestions?

Has anyone used a doubler or 3x with Zeiss 8x45 or 10x45? Does the 45mm objective let in enough light for a 3x? The 56mm objective is quite a price jump, is that needed for doubler or 3x?