I'm shooting a .338 lapua to 1000 yards and am looking to take this rifle out to around 1800. Doing pretty good with the stuff I've managed to scrape together and can usually keep my shots at or just under MOA. I've been experimenting with bullets and found that my new Hornaday 285g have a bit more weight variance than I think they should have. I've read several reports that tend to favor the Hornady over other bullets. I have weighed them severl times and over 3/4 of a box of 50 weighed in at or under 284.5. Lowest weighing 283.1 and going as high as 285.5. Now here's my question, how much diffrence in point of impact will the lightest built have next to the heaviest at extended range. I know there are several variables that will come into the picture, I do have some experiance with extended range, but I've never really weighed every bullet and this kinda shocked me. So lets say gun and shooter are cabable of shooting MOA at 1000 yards on perfect day with no winid. If I were to shot the lightest bullet, then the heaviest bullet. What's the diffrence in impact between the two shots. Anyone care to dive into this. Or am I asking a question that simply has endless results? Or does 2 grains of bullet weight not really change things all that much. Thanks for any imput.
Regards.
Regards.