Burt bit the dust?

1627416224887.gif
 
Hi,

Ahh DeerSniper reincarnate got banned too, lol?

Sincerely,
Theis

I think this is the first time ive disagreed with one of your assessments. I dont think he was deer sniper at all. He seemed too ignorant of many basic things about precision rifles (unless that was a ploy of his). Ive been wrong once before though. lmao
 
I think this is the first time ive disagreed with one of your assessments. I dont think he was deer sniper at all. He seemed too ignorant of many basic things about precision rifles (unless that was a ploy of his). Ive been wrong once before though. lmao

He posted a pic of his AI which I am 98% sure I have seen deer sniper post before lol
 
It's a fucking insult and goes to show the lack of respect

Not only did he violate a major rule by inserting politics into the informational sections, but he also made the account the same day he was banned.

I unbanned the Deersniper Account because why bother, you'll just do what you want anyway

I have zero respect for anyone laughing at this, as if we can't see it, I saw it immediately because even more insulting he walked right into my thread with his fake bullshit as if I won't know.

waste of our time

Enjoy it, but don't think we don't know and because we know, fuck off
 
Yea, the troll account tactic is a bitch ass move. If u get banned for being a dumbass, take it as sign that you should unfuck yourself before re-entering e-society. The troll account is further proof of why u were banned in the first place.
 
I think we have another candidate in the making.
Interesting to watch.
You wouldn't be referring to that guy oldiephrt shitting up Molon's thread about the 77gr Berger ammunition, would you?

Anyway, I think that most that use the feature would agree that "ignore" works great. But, we have seen time and time again that banning does not. Either the banned creates a new account, or the ban is reversed and they continue on the course that got them banned the first/third/100th time. What if the site could ignore a 'user?' They could log in, read, post, and see their posts in threads. But, only their account can see the post. Everyone says 'don't feed the trolls,' but every 'don't feed the troll' post serves to feed the troll. If the site could ignore trolls we would all stand a higher chance of them moving to more fertile ground. Oh well, that's enough of my unworkable ramblings...
 
You wouldn't be referring to that guy oldiephrt shitting up Molon's thread about the 77gr Berger ammunition, would you?

Anyway, I think that most that use the feature would agree that "ignore" works great. But, we have seen time and time again that banning does not. Either the banned creates a new account, or the ban is reversed and they continue on the course that got them banned the first/third/100th time. What if the site could ignore a 'user?' They could log in, read, post, and see their posts in threads. But, only their account can see the post. Everyone says 'don't feed the trolls,' but every 'don't feed the troll' post serves to feed the troll. If the site could ignore trolls we would all stand a higher chance of them moving to more fertile ground. Oh well, that's enough of my unworkable ramblings...
Basically a shadow ban. They seem to do a decent job of hiding user content.
 
Yea, the troll account tactic is a bitch ass move. If u get banned for being a dumbass, take it as sign that you should unfuck yourself before re-entering e-society. The troll account is further proof of why u were banned in the first place.
Actually, we get that as if it is any of your fucking business. But thanks for the cock sucking translation.