Re: calculating MV and BC from drop?..anyone know how?
As for the BC you can with a known range but you have to be a superstar shooter. Still have to have a math constant for velocity. As for Precisionworks they state to determine MV before you can determine BC.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The default DK [personalized trajectory] of 0.5 is a good place to start and many have found that it suffices for all but the most demanding work. If extreme accuracy at extreme ranges is required, however, the user should take the time to compute a custom DK. CAVEAT: Do NOT, DO NOT, DO NOT change the DK from its default value until 1) the scope has been calibrated, 2) the scope has been zeroed, 3) a muzzle velocity has been obtained and verified via the POI method, and 4) a ballistic coefficient has been calculated. If the shooter tries to use DK to get agreement between the actual and calculated trajectories using erroneous muzzle velocities and ballistic coefficients, the program will produce a distorted, inaccurate trajectory. The DK was not intended for this purpose and will yield completely unusable data. Don’t do it.</div></div>
You have one variable that is bullet drop. Every operation you perform on one side of an equation must be performed on both sides of the equals sign. In order to do that you need math constant(s). Example 3x = 2x + 1. What you want to know is BC = BD [operator] MV or MV = BD [operator] BC. In order to calculate MV and BC based bullet drop would never be precise because of the unknown variables. Really, it is no different than asking if you can calculate BC based on bullet drops at different ranges. You would have to be a perfect shot and relates to Precisioworks personalized trajectory (DK). Anyway, here is a treasure trove of formulas related to external ballistics. Please post a solution if you find one. Thanks.
http://www.jbmballistics.com/ballistics/downloads/downloads.shtml
EDIT: Also, Litz's book is nice. But people that recommend his book for questions like the OP are ignoring Litz himself or have not actually read the book.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Page 1: I felt there was a great need for a book that could explain the science of external ballistics to average shooters in layman's terms</div></div>
Litz repeats this philosophy throughout the book. So, instead of recommending an entire book for a simple formula question just properly quote Litz and the page number to help the OP understand that the formula is beyond a simple answer.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Page 25: If you measure: muzzle velocity, range to target, atmosphere, and have a known zero at some range, you can (in theory) determine the BC of the bullet based on bullet drop. As with many things, the simplest way stands to be the least accurate. <span style="font-weight: bold">The biggest problem with this approach is the rifle's ability to group precisely.</span></div></div>
The OPs other variable is MV. Litz's quote above is still relevant in regards to that variable as well since it is the other side of the formula being requested.