from using the SS 10x42M with the <span style="text-decoration: underline">low</span> XTR rings on a Warne 20 moa base?
Rifle Scopes Case ejection clearance issues?
- Thread starter GearboxRacquetball
- Start date
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
or should the medium XTR rings be used. I have a source for these rings which is the reason that I'm using them. I just want to ensure that the scope is no too high, and that the empty brass will not hit anything on its way out..like the windage turret, for example.
or should the medium XTR rings be used. I have a source for these rings which is the reason that I'm using them. I just want to ensure that the scope is no too high, and that the empty brass will not hit anything on its way out..like the windage turret, for example.
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
Ok...sometimes ( like now), if you actually explain yourself better people might actually be able to help...
we're looking for complete thoughts and the whole story...
what rifle, does it interfere now, etc.
Ok...sometimes ( like now), if you actually explain yourself better people might actually be able to help...
we're looking for complete thoughts and the whole story...
what rifle, does it interfere now, etc.
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
Sorry, thought I'd keep it short and to the point. 700 SPS Tactical with mounted SS 10x42 on 20moa base. Question then follows. If I select low rings with that size objective, is there a chance that the empties will hit the windage turret? Or will medium size (Burris XTR rings)be better. I don't want the thing mounted too high. I remember reading a review online that had this particular problem - that was not resolved by simply moving the scope either forwards or backwards. Again, sorry, I was trying to avoid a "novel" for this question..
Sorry, thought I'd keep it short and to the point. 700 SPS Tactical with mounted SS 10x42 on 20moa base. Question then follows. If I select low rings with that size objective, is there a chance that the empties will hit the windage turret? Or will medium size (Burris XTR rings)be better. I don't want the thing mounted too high. I remember reading a review online that had this particular problem - that was not resolved by simply moving the scope either forwards or backwards. Again, sorry, I was trying to avoid a "novel" for this question..
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
Burris XTR low will be fine, will not hit the turrets.You could go medium but it will be harder to get the right cheek weld.
Burris XTR low will be fine, will not hit the turrets.You could go medium but it will be harder to get the right cheek weld.
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
Thanks. Sorry about the confusion with my question. I was hoping that I could use the low ones on top of the 20moa base!
Thanks. Sorry about the confusion with my question. I was hoping that I could use the low ones on top of the 20moa base!
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
im running tps low mount rings on the same base and i have no problems with the cases hitting anything. youll be fine
im running tps low mount rings on the same base and i have no problems with the cases hitting anything. youll be fine
Re: Case ejection clearance issues?
I second the Burris XTR rings. You want the lowest mount in relation to the brrel you can get.
I second the Burris XTR rings. You want the lowest mount in relation to the brrel you can get.
