Has anyone done any testing on CCI BR primers vs. their normal 200 LR primers? The BR's are getting stupid expensive lately and I'm wondering how much of a performance decrease I will get if I switch to the standard non BR version?
Well, seeing as I've shot over 1000 rds of .308 in the last 2 months, yes, that extra 15$ adds up quick especially when I'm buying five thousand at a time. Thanks for the input guys. Especially 427 Cobra. I know you reload and shoot a lot of volume, that makes me feel more comfortable making the switch.
some of my loads like the br 2 better so i just loaded them into all my rounds. i put the price difference into perspective of what else id spend the 15 bux on. use to smoke 2 packs a day so the extra really didnt matter to me
Anyone else wanna chime in? So far I've got two in support of going to standard primers while I have one against (staying with the BR's that is). Anybody?
I use the 200's. The cups are a little softer and let me see the pressure sighns before the brass gives up. I think the 200's pack plenty of heat to fire anything that will fit in a 308 case.
My rifle actually like the 200's better (hundred rounds of each over a few range trips) showed that the 200's had on avg roughly a quarter inch improvement over br2 (in gun vise to take me out of it). Can't explain why. Chrono showed same fps.
Buy a 100 pack of each and do your own testing. Everyone's rifle/barrel is different- if you do your own tests- that's one less "what if I try this" question you'll have when you're sitting at your reloading bench.
I haven't noticed any accuracy differences between the CCi and federal primers worth mentioning all the way to 600 yds, but my groups seem a little tighter with the damn russian primers.
hope this helps.
you are correct, the federal primers are the softest of all, when i was doinfg lots of steel plate pistol matches with revolvers, if my trigger pull went under 9.5lbs in double action i could only ignite the federal primers. CCI are the hardest.
hope this helps.