I've shot a few chassis and stocks over the years. One thing I have noticed, but it never seams to be brought up is the resonance differences between some (Not all) chassis and stocks. However, typically, I notice more resonance with full aluminum chassis systems. Sometimes stocks like Foundations are touted for reducing this effect.
I notice resonance can lead to two subtle effects. Both of which are minor and can be difficult to prove change a system's inherent accuracy or the human interface with the rifle system. Also, I only notice the effects during dry firing. A fired round will mute these effects.
The first effect of resonance is the persistent harmonic ring after the firing pin contacts the bolt face when the rifle is dry fired. This effect is much like the persistent harmonic ring of a tuning fork. The harmonic ring's energy is easily transferred to the high acuity sensing systems in your head. Hearing, vision, equilibrium, touch, ect all add up to compound your subjective perspective. So, I would argue it "feels" like a bigger deal than they really is (getting flicked in the face is worse than getting punched in the arm).
The second effect is reticle hop during dry firing. I notice reticle hoping is worse in chassis/stock systems with more resonances. It's difficult to measure how much reticle hop is mechanical vs human influenced. Also, variables such as the mass of the shooter, shooting position, hand positon, and differing system components make this difficult to measure.
Understanding harmonics resonance is probably a smaller variable. Does anyone try to mitigate the effects of harmonics resonance in their rifle system in a practical way for... Let's say for PRS style shooting? Aside from more known methods like barrel tuners (rubberized or threaded), muzzle brakes, suppressor, adding weights, bedding, or cheek pads. Also, do you notice the same effects of harmonics resonance I describe?
I notice resonance can lead to two subtle effects. Both of which are minor and can be difficult to prove change a system's inherent accuracy or the human interface with the rifle system. Also, I only notice the effects during dry firing. A fired round will mute these effects.
The first effect of resonance is the persistent harmonic ring after the firing pin contacts the bolt face when the rifle is dry fired. This effect is much like the persistent harmonic ring of a tuning fork. The harmonic ring's energy is easily transferred to the high acuity sensing systems in your head. Hearing, vision, equilibrium, touch, ect all add up to compound your subjective perspective. So, I would argue it "feels" like a bigger deal than they really is (getting flicked in the face is worse than getting punched in the arm).
The second effect is reticle hop during dry firing. I notice reticle hoping is worse in chassis/stock systems with more resonances. It's difficult to measure how much reticle hop is mechanical vs human influenced. Also, variables such as the mass of the shooter, shooting position, hand positon, and differing system components make this difficult to measure.
Understanding harmonics resonance is probably a smaller variable. Does anyone try to mitigate the effects of harmonics resonance in their rifle system in a practical way for... Let's say for PRS style shooting? Aside from more known methods like barrel tuners (rubberized or threaded), muzzle brakes, suppressor, adding weights, bedding, or cheek pads. Also, do you notice the same effects of harmonics resonance I describe?