Dark Matter is Information?

The Standard Model is the current best theory in particle physics that describes the fundamental building blocks of the universe and the three of the four fundamental forces (strong, weak, and electromagnetic) that govern them. It categorizes particles into fermions (matter particles like quarks and leptons) and bosons (force-carrying particles like photons and gluons), and includes the Higgs boson, which gives particles mass. While incredibly successful, the Standard Model is incomplete, as it does not account for gravity or explain phenomena like neutrino masses.

Key Components of the Standard Model
Fermions (Matter Particles): These particles have a spin of a half-integer and make up all known matter.
Quarks: Six types (up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom) that combine to form composite particles like protons and neutrons.
Leptons: Six types, including the electron and its neutrino partners.

Bosons (Force-Carrying Particles): These particles mediate the fundamental forces.

Photons: Carry the electromagnetic force.
Gluons: Carry the strong force, binding quarks together.

W and Z Bosons: Carry the weak force, responsible for certain types of radioactive decay.

Higgs Boson: A fundamental particle associated with the Higgs field, which gives mass to other fundamental particles.

Fundamental Forces Explained

Electromagnetism: The interaction of electric and magnetic fields, carried by photons.

Strong Force: The force that binds quarks together to form protons and neutrons, and holds the nucleus of an atom together.

Weak Force: Responsible for nuclear reactions, such as those that power the Sun.
Limitations of the Standard Model

Gravity: The Standard Model does not include gravity, the fourth fundamental force of nature.

Neutrino Masses: The model does not fully explain the origin of neutrino masses.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The Standard Model does not account for the existence of dark matter and dark energy, which make up a significant portion of the universe.

1758845462318.png


1758845482138.png


You can thank my CIA handler...
 
Gravity: The Standard Model does not include gravity, the fourth fundamental force of nature.

A force to be reckoned with. Gravity is the key to it all, it is everything. Without Gravity holding the structure of space and time together. The presentation it is responsible for, in the Door swinging, closing, and hitting me on the Ass on my way out the this Thread topic would not exist.
.
 
My cousin is an astronomy major, and knows they're just making shit up. They've vastly underestimated the amount of dust and gas out there. It's all about getting funding.
Yes. They are making stuff up, lots of it. Like "billions of light years away".
They do have the maths though, and they good enpugh at it to KNOW they can't account for 90+% of the matter in the universe.
Maybe....there are other dimensions beside the three we know....
They know this already. They have to know it, because that is what a super collider is for.
What blows my mind is that they are still mostly atheists and agnostics.
Why can't we see the matter?
Thats easy....
 
When we understand the smallest things, then we will see there is something smaller.

When we understand something extremely vast, there will be more beyond that.

When we know of something far away, there will be something further.

Nobody can prove me wrong. Nor can I prove that true.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3668.gif
    IMG_3668.gif
    2 MB · Views: 15
Yes. They are making stuff up, lots of it. Like "billions of light years away".
They do have the maths though, and they good enpugh at it to KNOW they can't account for 90+% of the matter in the universe.
Maybe....there are other dimensions beside the three we know....
They know this already. They have to know it, because that is what a super collider is for.
What blows my mind is that they are still mostly atheists and agnostics.
Why can't we see the matter?
Thats easy....


In my opinion the real question is........

Why can't we see WHAT matters?
 
When we understand the smallest things, then we will see there is something smaller.

When we understand something extremely vast, there will be more beyond that.

When we know of something far away, there will be something further.

Nobody can prove me wrong. Nor can I prove that true.
I call that fractal physics. The closer you look, the more you see…to infinity and beyond. :). You can literally never know it all.

If all info is written to the Lords universe. Our spirits or souls could be that energy or info that seems to be missing.

Just pondering.
 
I call that fractal physics. The closer you look, the more you see…to infinity and beyond. :). You can literally never know it all.

If all info is written to the Lords universe. Our spirits or souls could be that energy or info that seems to be missing.

Just pondering.
There are those that have explored that too. And yes, they still know nothing, but if information is never really destroyed, then it makes sense that our souls and information continue to exist in some plane.
 
Until we prove gravity not just “the math works”, I’m skeptical on quantum theories and advanced thought based purely on math with no physical proof.

But that’s just me
Okay. Meet you at the Empire State Building and you let me know, as you are falling, what floor you’re passing when you realize gravity is real. 😁
 
Okay. Meet you at the Empire State Building and you let me know, as you are falling, what floor you’re passing when you realize gravity is real. 😁
But about the time you realize it is real, then you get that weightless feeling, and then you can’t feel what you now believe in. So you wonder, maybe I was right all aloSPLAT
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: brianf and lash
Until we prove gravity not just “the math works”, I’m skeptical on quantum theories and advanced thought based purely on math with no physical proof.

But that’s just me
.. and that is the quandary. It all being laid out, theorized by those who posses, and 'understand' advanced mathematics. It is really just a small circle groups worldwide, a mathematics, theoretical think ( Geek Squads ) that exchanges information, and argues among themselves. publishing, on the most off the wall, existential ideas their minds conceive .
.But,. put them in reality of everyday life where math is not being used except at the cash register. Can anyone of them possess the desire to track down where the vacuum leak is coming from, off the vacuum pump, down the firewall, running into engine compartment is ? , that operates runs the cruse control on my dodge diesel like I am doing right at this moment ?
.
 
.. and that is the quandary. It all being laid out, theorized by those who posses, and 'understand' advanced mathematics. It is really just a small circle groups worldwide, a mathematics, theoretical think ( Geek Squads ) that exchanges information, and argues among themselves. publishing, on the most off the wall, existential ideas their minds conceive .
.But,. put them in reality of everyday life where math is not being used except at the cash register. Can anyone of them possess the desire to track down where the vacuum leak is coming from, off the vacuum pump, down the firewall, running into engine compartment is ? , that operates runs the cruse control on my dodge diesel like I am doing right at this moment ?
.

Check all connection points first.

Second, look for chafing areas.

Third, replace the entire vacuum line because it'll just come back if there are rubber hoses.

Fourth, cuss and throw tools
 
Until we prove gravity not just “the math works”, I’m skeptical on quantum theories and advanced thought based purely on math with no physical proof.

But that’s just me

If a fourth dimension is time, what if there is a fifth dimension? I speculate a fifth dimension would be perspective.
How can one measure perspective?
I've always been skeptical of quantum physics. This is the first forum I've ever found myself in a position to mention this idea.
 
If a fourth dimension is time, what if there is a fifth dimension? I speculate a fifth dimension would be perspective.
How can one measure perspective?
I've always been skeptical of quantum physics. This is the first forum I've ever found myself in a position to mention this idea.
I think quantum is like wind.. humans knew something was there but didn’t exactly know “what it was”
 
There’s another the
Check all connection points first.

Second, look for chafing areas.

Third, replace the entire vacuum line because it'll just come back if there are rubber hoses.

Fourth, cuss and throw tools
damn! I’ve been doing it backwards the whole time…
 
If a fourth dimension is time, what if there is a fifth dimension? I speculate a fifth dimension would be perspective.
How can one measure perspective?
I've always been skeptical of quantum physics. This is the first forum I've ever found myself in a position to mention this idea.


Screenshot_20250927_112757_Chrome.jpg
 
Okay, I know that many of you have zero interests in advanced quantum physics, but a few of you might find this very interesting.

I am just posting the link as I know that many of you automatically skip anything more than two sentences long…😁

That area of publication has the most fantasy (in fantasy, vs Science) of any legitimate branch of Science. Theoretical physics is where the word salad artists ply their trade. About a decade ago someone suggested I read Lisa Randall's book on "branes" etc. She was doing book tours on teevee and video when it was published. I read the thing and thought it was a long-form version of a Sat AM cartoon I'd seen as a kid. Cool graphics that would engage your imagination. But in book narrative, not graphics.

Whether I'd call it Science? No. I'd call it fantasy designed to engage a quasi-science curiosity, but maybe also something that can mislead on "state of the art" in domestic research.
 
That area of publication has the most fantasy (in fantasy, vs Science) of any legitimate branch of Science. Theoretical physics is where the word salad artists ply their trade. About a decade ago someone suggested I read Lisa Randall's book on "branes" etc. She was doing book tours on teevee and video when it was published. I read the thing and thought it was a long-form version of a Sat AM cartoon I'd seen as a kid. Cool graphics that would engage your imagination. But in book narrative, not graphics.

Whether I'd call it Science? No. I'd call it fantasy designed to engage a quasi-science curiosity, but maybe also something that can mislead on "state of the art" in domestic research.
And your expertise is in what field?
 
That area of publication has the most fantasy (in fantasy, vs Science) of any legitimate branch of Science. Theoretical physics is where the word salad artists ply their trade. About a decade ago someone suggested I read Lisa Randall's book on "branes" etc. She was doing book tours on teevee and video when it was published. I read the thing and thought it was a long-form version of a Sat AM cartoon I'd seen as a kid. Cool graphics that would engage your imagination. But in book narrative, not graphics.

Whether I'd call it Science? No. I'd call it fantasy designed to engage a quasi-science curiosity, but maybe also something that can mislead on "state of the art" in domestic research.
You read the article right? Parsed from the article:

“So far, this might sound purely theoretical. But we have already tested parts of QMM on today's quantum computers. We treated qubits, the basic units of quantum computers, as tiny spacetime cells. Using imprint and retrieval protocols based on the QMM equations, we recovered the original quantum states with over 90% accuracy.”

“This showed us two things. First, that the imprint operator works on real quantum systems. Second, it has practical benefits. By combining imprinting with conventional error-correction codes, we significantly reduced logical errors. That means QMM might not only explain the cosmos, but also help us build better quantum computers.”

“…
It ties together some of the deepest puzzles in physics, from the information paradox to dark matterand dark energy, from cosmic cycles to the arrow of time.

And it does so in a way that can already be simulated and tested in the lab. Whether QMM proves to be the final word or a stepping stone, it opens a startling possibility: the universe may not only be geometry and energy. It is also memory. And in that memory, every moment of cosmic history may still be written.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Herb Stoner
If you think about it, infinity is an impossibility for us. The human race can only attempt to comprehend what infinity is. We struggle to deal with infinity in mathematics and physics but really can't. The best we can do is never-ending equations that melt our calculators. And yet the universe is so large, it appears to us to be infinite. Obviously, we don't know that for sure, (because by definition we never could know lol).

I think God placed us in this gigantic space as a sign of his existence. Why would He create billions of galaxies that can't even be seen with the naked eye if not for a purpose? Think of everything that the Hubble telescope can see, supernovas and nebulas etc. Spectacular wonders! If the reality of infinity is laid bare to us every night when we look at the stars, what's so hard about believing God exists? He practically placed a portrait of himself in the heavens, we just can't see enough of the picture to recognize Him.
When you look at the span of the known universe and try to comprehend it's size and everything in it. And then understand we are in a backwater section of an unremarkable spiral galaxy... You start to realize that we don't even count as insects. We aren't even protozoa. We don't even count as atoms compared to the vastness and grandeur of the universe.

He created all of what we see and know out of sheer will. A thought. A word.

There's that scene in the 10 Commandments when Moses stretches out his staff and God parts the Red Sea for the Hebrews... And we're all like, "Man, that's cool and awesome. A display of the power of God."

And God was thinking, "If you think that's neat... Wait until you guys invent the telescope and learn how the sun works, and other stuff like that... And then you'll understand that Me parting some water with the wind is absolutely nothing compared to what I am capable of."

All matter, energy, time, and space... Everything we comprehend and understand. Everything we don't comprehend and understand... All exist as a matter of His thought and will.

"I am that I am" is the only explanation that our human minds could ever begin to comprehend.

Mike
 
Okay, I know that many of you have zero interests in advanced quantum physics, but a few of you might find this very interesting.

I am just posting the link as I know that many of you automatically skip anything more than two sentences long…😁

1759013532266.jpeg


DId not expect to find fiziks in the pit.

This whole "Dark Matter" and dark energy reminds me of the "ether" from 120 years ago. And given that a large part of physics is statistical mechanics (information theory), definitely worth exploring, especially if it can explained our current unexplained universe behavior. As a bonus, the theory can be verified unlike certain other ones (*ahem* looking at you string theory).

Also a reminder, not all scientists are godless heathens. Just most em. But there is no middle ground.

OTOH, a self-publicizing article is kinda like a 3-shot group. Just ewww. First rule of science: don't talk to the press--they'll f it up!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barneybdb and lash