Maggie’s Detroit...what shame....
- Thread starter netranger6
- Start date
Re: Detroit...what shame....
Just finished the news video and have to say... WTF? I enjoy the denials "nope... wasn't me."
Only one phrase makes sense...
"douche-bags"
Happy to see they're the ".1%" to be fired today.
Just finished the news video and have to say... WTF? I enjoy the denials "nope... wasn't me."
Only one phrase makes sense...
"douche-bags"
Happy to see they're the ".1%" to be fired today.
Re: Detroit...what shame....
Nothing like smokin' a blunt and slamming a 40 of OE or Colt .45 on a break. No worries, there's always Obamanomics for them I suppose. 99 weeks of sit on your ass unemployment.
Nothing like smokin' a blunt and slamming a 40 of OE or Colt .45 on a break. No worries, there's always Obamanomics for them I suppose. 99 weeks of sit on your ass unemployment.
Re: Detroit...what shame....
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: netranger6</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No worries, there's always Obamanomics for them I suppose. 99 weeks of sit on your ass unemployment. </div></div>You don't get unemployment if you are fired for wrongful conduct.
Besides, Michigan just ended the 99 weeks, dropped long-termers from the rolls and is going back to a 6 month maximum. Maybe that'll learn 'em... right after it also punishes the thirty-six cops laid-off in Lansing and all the teachers now out of a job in Detroit.
It's a no-brainer to bad-mouth the pot-smoking fools who work there - maybe easier than asking why managers who make six and seven-figure salaries choose to hire felons and drug addicts to begin with.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: netranger6</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No worries, there's always Obamanomics for them I suppose. 99 weeks of sit on your ass unemployment. </div></div>You don't get unemployment if you are fired for wrongful conduct.
Besides, Michigan just ended the 99 weeks, dropped long-termers from the rolls and is going back to a 6 month maximum. Maybe that'll learn 'em... right after it also punishes the thirty-six cops laid-off in Lansing and all the teachers now out of a job in Detroit.
It's a no-brainer to bad-mouth the pot-smoking fools who work there - maybe easier than asking why managers who make six and seven-figure salaries choose to hire felons and drug addicts to begin with.
Re: Detroit...what shame....
Just think they was building your cars and trucks too. Now you know why cars and trucks cost 30 to 50,000 dollars. They need to buy drugs and alcohol with the money.
You can't say you didn't know they were drunk and high on the job. Do drug screening. Pick a better location in America to build autos and defense equipment.
Just think they was building your cars and trucks too. Now you know why cars and trucks cost 30 to 50,000 dollars. They need to buy drugs and alcohol with the money.
You can't say you didn't know they were drunk and high on the job. Do drug screening. Pick a better location in America to build autos and defense equipment.
Re: Detroit...what shame....
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: netranger6</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No worries, there's always Obamanomics for them I suppose. 99 weeks of sit on your ass unemployment. </div></div>You don't get unemployment if you are fired for wrongful conduct.
Besides, Michigan just ended the 99 weeks, dropped long-termers from the rolls and is going back to a 6 month maximum. Maybe that'll learn 'em... right after it also punishes the thirty-six cops laid-off in Lansing and all the teachers now out of a job in Detroit.
It's a no-brainer to bad-mouth the pot-smoking fools who work there - maybe easier than asking why managers who make six and seven-figure salaries choose to hire felons and drug addicts to begin with. </div></div>
I concur, but aren't they Union? I bet if someone tracks these leeches, one or more will be on the UI rolls, TANF, SNAP, or a combo of the 3.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: netranger6</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No worries, there's always Obamanomics for them I suppose. 99 weeks of sit on your ass unemployment. </div></div>You don't get unemployment if you are fired for wrongful conduct.
Besides, Michigan just ended the 99 weeks, dropped long-termers from the rolls and is going back to a 6 month maximum. Maybe that'll learn 'em... right after it also punishes the thirty-six cops laid-off in Lansing and all the teachers now out of a job in Detroit.
It's a no-brainer to bad-mouth the pot-smoking fools who work there - maybe easier than asking why managers who make six and seven-figure salaries choose to hire felons and drug addicts to begin with. </div></div>
I concur, but aren't they Union? I bet if someone tracks these leeches, one or more will be on the UI rolls, TANF, SNAP, or a combo of the 3.
G
Guest
Guest
Re: Detroit...what shame....
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: maggot</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The blonde reporter was hot....for past 40 especially. </div></div>
Look, man. I'm all for live and let live and all that, but damn!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: maggot</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The blonde reporter was hot....for past 40 especially. </div></div>
Look, man. I'm all for live and let live and all that, but damn!
Re: Detroit...what shame....
Some great investigative journalism here... I've got a crazy idea, why don't we let the company decide who is fit to work on premises instead of some dolt from Fox News "Problem Solvers"? Is it that hard to believe that a welder is capable of safely and efficiently performing his duties at work after smoking a blunt with a few of his buddies in the parking lot?
Some great investigative journalism here... I've got a crazy idea, why don't we let the company decide who is fit to work on premises instead of some dolt from Fox News "Problem Solvers"? Is it that hard to believe that a welder is capable of safely and efficiently performing his duties at work after smoking a blunt with a few of his buddies in the parking lot?
Similar threads
