Digital smart boresighter (Zero-Verify)

[zeroverfied]

Going digital!!!! The app will boresight, record zero, and verify zero when needed without going to the range. I am in the process of allowing companies that do analog boresighting to license the technology. The goal is to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to identify all factors contributing to a bullet's trajectory. Once identified, the variables can be replaced, and a new zero can be produced with these new non-standard conditions (weather, shooter ability, weapon, and ammunition performance. Please review the video clip, give me feedback, and ask any questions.

 

[oldrifleman]

Some please bring Popcorn

 

[zeroverfied]

Please take a seat and enjoy the show. Who would have thought that DOPE would be where it is now and the growth of the knowledge base?

 

[zeroverfied]

The goal is to identify and replace all variables as the user sees them decay/change. All zeros are snapshots in time. It seems that whatever affects trajectory at 25 yards does so at 100 yards, 800 yards, and more. Cut bait and fish, trolling.....

 

[zeroverfied]

I'm looking to license two versions, ZV Lite and ZV Pro. These retail prices could be $40 and $225, respectively.

 

[zeroverfied]

Having saved zero, you can use different uppers, the same scope, and the same lower AR10 or AR15 rifle.

 

[zeroverfied]

I applaud your ingenuity and entrepreneurship. People with ideas and intelligence continue to make remarkable improvements in tools relating to shooting sports. A suggestion: I would not emphasize boresighting as the tool’s key use. While I am willing to spend untold $’s (untold to my wife anyway) on gadgets to improve my shooting precision at distance, I would not waste a dollar on a boresight tool. Why? It’s just so damn easy and uncomplicated and inexpensive to take one shot of factory ammo at 25 yards and adjust. I expect that’s why you received some initial negative responses as most guys on this forum can boresight in their sleep. When I read the title “boresighter”, I was immediately turned off. Your tool seems to be good for quickly zeroing and syncing POI with POA at various ranges and appears to have utility far above boresighting. I would emphasize this aspect and call it something like quick-zero or smart-zero.

Thank you for the feedback!

 

[oldrifleman]

What ever came of your product?

 

[zeroverfied]

Sorry meant to add this comment to your new post

What ever came of your product?

Improvement and refinement continues, at the point of writing white papers for the Military on how to use ZV to predict Zero.

 

[oldrifleman]

Improvement and refinement continues, at the point of writing white papers for the Military on how to use ZV to predict Zero.

Sounds great, I admit I was a doubter, and maybe still am, but I also celebrate innovation. I agree that tying it to the term bore sight is counter productive. The concept of predictive ballistics in real time is interesting!

 

[zeroverfied]

Sounds great, I admit I was a doubter, and maybe still am, but I also celebrate innovation. I agree that tying it to the term bore sight is counter productive. The concept of predictive ballistics in real time is interesting!

The concept lies in the chamber. It is the point of departure. When you look through the bore in the old-fashioned way, using a proven method, this is no different. Instead, you have a sensor that does the looking and identifies the intersection.

 

[carbonbased]

Also here: https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/ballistic-subject-matter-expert-needed.7261416/

Not for me, but interesting. Perhaps in a high-volume multi-user scenario it would pay off, especially if those users are not higher-skilled shooters. @Terry Cross has some cool analysis in the link.

 

[zeroverfied]

Also here: https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/ballistic-subject-matter-expert-needed.7261416/

Not for me, but interesting. Perhaps in a high-volume multi-user scenario it would pay off, especially if those users are not higher-skilled shooters. @Terry Cross has some cool analysis in the link.

Agree