• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

Night Vision Educate a Noob on the specs please

kb1

Sergeant
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
Dec 12, 2004
381
119
Colorado
This tube WP tube
These specs
PS 2384
Halo .97
EBI .96
Res 64
FOM 1670
Doesn't have a blem report, but this is what I see

The tube is clean, and can't see any blems, but I haven't really had it out and about yet to give it a good look through. The FOM seems pretty low (from what I do know). Would you have paid 3k on sale for this tube?
 

Attachments

  • 20200901_081242.jpg
    20200901_081242.jpg
    64.6 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
First, pull the photo of your data sheet before the ITAR Nazi’s get here (probably too late already). You can type in and list the specs, but posting photos of spec sheets are supposedly verbotten.

Second, those specs are modestly decent. That tube is very serviceable and will perform just fine. It’s also a tube that stands a better chance at having a useful life mounted on a weapon, due to it’s comparatively large Halo.

Zero things wrong with it. Zero things notable or great about it.

As long as you got a solid deal on it, I’d be satisfied with it just fine. If you paid a premium for it, or it was represented as a high-spec tube, I would not be so happy.

ETA: I just noticed you paid $3K for it. That is definitely NOT a $3K tube and I would be “sad.” :sick:
 
Last edited:
Thanks. That is pretty much what I figured when I looked at the specs, I just wanted someone with more knowledge than I to confirm it.