• Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    Drop your caption in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

Fail to Latch

Hobo Hilton

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Jun 4, 2011
12,504
12,303
73
Pacific Northwest
Hawkins M5 Style Detachable Magazine Bottom Metal .... Will not latch on a metal Acurate-Mag magazine but will latch on a Magpul magazine. Both magazines are new, never loaded. This was discovered while checking pre-fit before installing bottom metal.

Suggestions or comments?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6737.JPG
    IMG_6737.JPG
    262.5 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_6742.JPG
    IMG_6742.JPG
    449.2 KB · Views: 31
Both mags and lower metal were sent back to Hawkins. Magpul is seated higher because it is locked in. Accurate-Mag hung up on the blued spring tab. I would not feel comfortable removing metal from the mag in order to get it to lock. Also I would not feel comfortable removing metal from a new Hawkins bottom metal. Some clearance has to be fitted in somewhere. I'll follow up when the bottom metal is returned.
 
Update:
I have been communicating (Email) with Mr. Hawkins. He handled this very businesslike and it did not take long to sense his knowledge in his field. I attempted to pick his brain as much as possible. He gave me the short course on Magazines, Manufacturer's, specifications and his preferences. To solve my issue, he removed a slight amount of the metal from the spring that activates the latch (see photo). Turn around time was less than 5 days, including the weekend.

After my conversations with him, I was prompted to do some additional checking of the magazines I have on hand. I found one Accurate-Mag to be slightly out of spec for my application (see photo) I tweaked it a bit and got it to working better.

Upfront, I don't have a lot of experience with precision weapons. My experience with Hawkins was positive.

Hobo
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6796.JPG
    IMG_6796.JPG
    314.3 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_6795.JPG
    IMG_6795.JPG
    290.2 KB · Views: 24
  • IMG_6798.JPG
    IMG_6798.JPG
    214.7 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_6790.JPG
    IMG_6790.JPG
    481.4 KB · Views: 20