Re: Falcon menace vs nikon monarch
Love how ur nikon pic is in the sun, and falcon is in the shade! Making the nikon appear much brighter. Nikon is in my opinion the best sub $1200 scope to transmit light, and is very clear. Compared monarchs and vIII and even the "mighty"mk4? Nikon is always the better one, although the mk4 is insanely close...but for that price it should be... I am not for or against either both are quality scopes bottom line. Nikons you could add $100-200 per scope, luepolds you could subtract $150-400. One is a steal, the other is very over priced. Mk4 $1500 is not on same level as SS5-20HD(personally it beats a night force hands down for much cheaper, Vortex Razor HD up with SS. Mk4 is a tier below these but costs more??? All u die hard Luepold guys haha well im sure ur comments are to come. Bottom line you dont always get what you pay for, hence the 1,000's of threads! SS are sold direct from makers wholesale... Luepolds are leeched by multiple middle men, nikons are very reasnoble and there monarch x scopes are up there with SWfa SS. Maybe between mk4 and SS. Vortex Razor HD( made in Wisconsin!!(USA!!) Great scope, on same level as SS. Weaver tactical is $750 but is insanely similar to SS and is by far one of best tac scopes for $.
Back to original topic you didnt need to play up nikon, it would of won legit, but most shmoes cant tell the difference so you helped lol!