Federal 210M to CCI 200 Experiences

[rockchalk06]

Running low on 210M's. It's what I've developed my load with for 6.5 and 308. I have a healthy supply of CCI 200's on hand that I'll have to dig in to.

What's been your experience changing up from 210M to #200 on load development? I know I'll have some finagling to do, but just curious what y'all's experience has been.

Thanks in advance SH

 

[Mr Tibbs]

Rockchalk06 : this may help you

 

[rockchalk06]

Rockchalk06 : this may help you

Thank you!

 

[Mr Tibbs]

Your very welcome

 

[308sako]

I chronograph most all my shooting, and my lot of CCI 200 primers give me the lowest standard deviations in comparison to both Federal 210 standard or match as well as the Wolf large rifle magnums. As always YMMV

As a side note this lot of 200s also beat some older cci bench rest large rifle primers. Both in my 6.5 Creedmoor and my .308

 

[lightman]

Its been my experience that there was very little difference. If my load was below max I personally would load and shoot them. If I was at max I might drop a grain and work back up. But thats just me.

 

[rockchalk06]

Its been my experience that there was very little difference. If my load was below max I personally would load and shoot them. If I was at max I might drop a grain and work back up. But thats just me.

Thank you.

 

[TheOfficeT-Rex]

I noticed no difference between the two using either H4350 or RL16. I also didn't have a chrono at the time. You may notice some difference across a chrono or if you're using ball powder, I did notice some difference between CCI and Fed SRP when loading AA2230 in 223.

 

[Kevins750]

I only shoot cci200 with 43.7gr of varget and FC once fired brass in 308 my other load is 42gr of imr 4064 with fggm
In lapua brass and both have single digit SD with ES under 15.