I don't understand why someone would chose a reticle like the H2CMR reticle for an FFP scope over a reticle like the Horus H59. Wouldn't it be more accurate to base your holds off a grid, rather than holding out in space? Is there an instance where the H2CMR would have an advantage?
I hope to have a .338 at some point. I wanted a S&B scope. I don't see the purpose in a scope for holdovers without an accurate way of holding over. Also, can you get a Horus reticle in a S&B scope or can you recommend a good alternative?
Thanks for your help.
I hope to have a .338 at some point. I wanted a S&B scope. I don't see the purpose in a scope for holdovers without an accurate way of holding over. Also, can you get a Horus reticle in a S&B scope or can you recommend a good alternative?
Thanks for your help.