I got your point but your point was off topic. Apparently, Hitler is your hot button. It appears that you are so emotional, for whatever reason, regarding Hitler that you refuse to admit that he did positive things for Germany (I'm speaking pre-Holocaust).
<span style="color: #990000"> No it's actually on topic because you and me are both expressing our 1st amendment rights which is relevant to the topic at hand. As for "positive" things about him, they are either tiered with his warmongering, or his mercilious killing, and since the whole basis for the Nazi party in Germany was blaming the decline of their economy on another race then it's more like watching a growing hurricane then it is a silver lining to everything.</span>
<span style="color: #3333FF">You are missing the point still. My original point was that I don't think people sport such symbolism with "positive" intentions. You have tunnel vision on my previous posts, believing that I was somehow advocating Hitler's atrocities in the name of "positivity" and contribution to mankind. You have successfully transitioned my point into an ethics debate. Since we are here, do you believe that every fabric of Hitler, from womb to grave was some deep scheme to further the control and pain of mankind without any positives?</span>
If not, why was he Time Magazine's man of the year and why was he on Time Magazine's (Greatest Man) Man of the Millennium list in the year 2000?
<span style="color: #990000"> It's been said even by Time Magazine themselves that the Man of the Year/Millenium awards are given out to the person who has the, <span style="text-decoration: underline">greatest impact</span>, on the world whether, good or BAD. The whole thing is meant to be non-objective so I can't see why you are trying to make a point of it.</span>
<span style="color: #3333FF">This is true, however, my point is that somebody, (not me) may add this to Hitler's list of accolades and argue that Hitler's resurrection of Germany was misguided and had potential to be great without atrocity.
</span>
Don't try to vilify me by implying that I was writing "positives" about the Holocaust. You should re-read my previous posts......slowly.
<span style="color: #990000"> I'm not trying to make you look evil. I'm posting a counter point that all the positives that you have listed, have in fact more ties to the tyranny and oppression of Germany and her people then any positive one thing. You were trying to make a point earlier on in your posts by saying that Hitler did positive things to help out mankind. My problem with that is that everything is you have listed has been repeated over and over again, by different people, without realizing the larger picture of what those things were created for. There is a reason that such things as the V1/V2 rockets were created, and judging by the V meaning Vengence, they weren't for a space program to the moon. </span>
<span style="color: #3333FF">Again, I am pointing out the "positives" that somebody (again, not me), may cite as a byproduct of Hitler's power. I purposely omitted the manner in which these "positives" were created or the motive behind them because it's not an argument that I am making for myself. I was merely stating what somebody may include as a "positive" regardless of reasoning. Please, see my original point for further explanation.</span>
What history book told you that Hitler was a monster from the get go? Sounds like emotional concluding to me.
<span style="color: #990000"> It's not emotional when it's proven that the Nazi Party blamed Germany's depression on other races. And if Mein Kampf wasn't a red flag then what was? </span>
<span style="color: #3333FF">
I never refuted the fact that the Nazi Party blamed Germany's depression on other races. Yes, Mein Kampf was a red flag. However, there were contributions to mankind that came via Hitler's regime. You continue to deny that citing the inhumanities far outweigh the "contributions." If I had a time machine then yes, I would forgo the contributions in lieu of the suffering incurred. But I don't have a time machine so that just leaves us with facts. Hitler's Nazi Germany did further the development of science and infrastructure. Like it or not, we as a society take advantage of those developments today. As a matter of fact, the medical data generated by those "experiments" are still used today (with great ethical debate).</span>
Anyways, you refuse to see my original point and I'm not here to give you a history lesson. An explanation would only fall on deaf ears because you already have a preconceived image of history and also appear emotionally effected....maybe it's all the people you know with "free tattoos".
<span style="color: #990000"> My image of history concerning Hitler, Nazi Germany, and the Holocaust is based off of all the concentration camps and Holocaust survivors that I have interviewed when I was overseas. I did know a fairly considerable amount before I went, but that turned out to not even be the tip of the iceberg in comparison to those who had lived through it.</span>
<span style="color: #3333FF">Yup, I've been to Germany too. It is sad to walk the grounds that were once arena for testing and torture. I too have spoken with death-camp prisoners. I feel for these people but this does not take away from factual history.</span>
I encourage you to attempt to learn (the truth) about all historical figures weather you like them or not. Knowing your enemies successes and failures doesn't make you a trader or a sympathizer.
<span style="color: #990000"> I hope you make a journey to Europe if you haven't been. It's a very different place, but special nonetheless. I encourage you to experience it. </span>
<span style="color: #3333FF">I can't emphasize this enough:
My original point: I don't think people wear these symbols for the "positives".
Your point: Hitler was such an idol of evil that his "contributions" have been overshadowed and undone by his deeds and motives, hence, there were no "contributions."
You need to understand that I am making a point, THAT SOMEBODY ELSE (the wearer of the swastika), would make for a "positive." I then go on to explain that, in my experience, I have never seen anybody wearing these symbols attempt to tell me the "good" as an excuse for wearing them. I then conclude that people do not wear them for the "positive" (no matter how minute the "positive" is).
Do you understand? Or do you think I'm still advocating Hitler's regime?</span>
</div></div>