Re: Hornady OAL gauge varies with bullets?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ChrisGarrett</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: thefitter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It seems that the measurement is different depending on the bullet type and even weight.
There is a difference between SMK in 168 or 175. I'm surprised.
</div></div>
Wait until you measure different lots of the same bullet, or put the tool into your action oriented one way vs. the another, the time before.
<span style="color: #3366FF">You just had to say this didn't you?</span>
There is a learning curve and a certain finesse' which is required with the Hornady/Stoney Point OAL gage.
For the straight tool, I insert it into the action, using a single bullet with the thumbscrew at the 12:00 position, making sure I have a good seating of the bullet. I'll write this number down.
I'll then take the same bullet and put the thumbscrew at the 3:00 position, relative to the action's top, measure and write this number down.
Finally, I'll put the thumbscrew at the 9:00 position and measure with that same bullet, write it down and then average these three measurements together.
This is the OAL for bullet #1.
Depending on time, I'll grab two more bullets (total of 3) and repeat the above process (or I'll do 4 more) and average those 3, or 5 numbers together for a final OAL for that lot of bullets.
Number these 3, or 5, bullets and place them in a ziplock baggie, along with a sheet of paper with the each's averaged OAL and use them to tell you how much throat errosion you have, if you're starting out with a new barrel, as you progress through your round-count.
This is the process I use for each and every specific bullet type/lot number.
I have three distinct Hornady 7mm 162gr HPBT Nation Match bullets, all with the same part number, but their design and dimensions are all over the map.
Same with some 168gr 7mm SMKs.
Chris </div></div>
I took 6 measurements and then averaged them. The biggest variable I see is how much pressure is applied when advancing the rod.