I’m not going to say I told you so, but…Elon musk

Old but relevant
1751793158019.png
 
I guess that he's not familiar with what happened to the Tea Party. The uni party have 250 year old stranglehold on the system. They will use the alphabet and NGO's to crush its enemies.

Space X and starlink might be declared too important for national security to be in private hands or a monopoly and broken up. Tesla stock? Not a good idea right now
 
Elon is a silly foreign cunt. No one with more than four brain cells thought DOGE was anything more than a data and power grab and a play to shut down any regulatory agency which limits his ventures in futurism. His belief that we live in a simulation and he is tasked with speeding humanity’s evolution out of physical existence should get him ICED back to South Africa.

He’s Trouble, he’s anti-American, it was a mistake to let him swim around in the data pools of the US government.

I’m all for a political party for actual Americans but Fuck Elon sideways.
 
The deep state uniparty has a stranglehold on the two party illusion of choice presented to us people. The way campaign finance laws are structured pretty much keeps a third party out of enough money to get their message heard.

The way to right the current ship is to get enough outsider liberty minded people placed into the republican ranks. Just look how the democrat party got hijacked from the so called working class party in the 50s and 60s into the socialist extreme that it is now. It was hijacked by radicals over time.

The republican party needs to be hijacked by liberty minded folks. This starts in the primaries. Only voting on election day and ignoring the primaries guarantees the uniparty stays in control.

Trump is a good start to the process. He is an outsider that both sides of the deep state hate.

Elon should leave the scorched earth 3rd party idea alone and concentrate on winning primaries with liberty minded people for the republican party.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
I was one of the fools who voted for Perot because I foolishly believed he was serious. Yeah, that worked out…🙄


Me too. While Ross was a bit of a nit wit, I remain thankful that he provided a way to vote against goddamm "read my lips, no new taxes." Without having to vote for Peanut boy.
 
Last edited:
I was one of the fools who voted for Perot because I foolishly believed he was serious. Yeah, that worked out…🙄
It’s not foolish to want a change. You took a chance that a lot of others weren’t willing to take. Perot offered that change, even if he wasn’t big and powerful enough to overthrow the two party system.
 

I told you he’s bad news

You weren’t wrong. I got some good entertainment out of him, but I never thought it would last long. Unfortunately too many thought that Elon was another hero. He’s just another uber wealthy trying to get more wealth. Maybe he can launch himself to mars now
 
I guess that he's not familiar with what happened to the Tea Party. The uni party have 250 year old stranglehold on the system. They will use the alphabet and NGO's to crush its enemies.

Space X and starlink might be declared too important for national security to be in private hands or a monopoly and broken up. Tesla stock? Not a good idea right now
If all of his gov contracts get ripped up, “they” try gunning down twatter again, and he’s still in the freedom game I might, might start to believe he’s for real. As of right now I think he’s a Trojan horse
 
You all realize that none of this is organic. Everything is as scripted as the WWF. This douche did not become a billionaire by inventing something. Any more than that Facebook guy.

He’s just another kayfabe actor who is doing his job and playing his role. He is no different that Zelenskyy, Jinping, potato or Trump.
 
if it is used to oust entrenched rinos or democrap scum, i don't see a huge problem.
if the gop won't fund campaigns to replace warmongers like graham, let them have at it.
obviously running a candidate for president is stupid af.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The D and lash
if it is used to oust entrenched rinos or democrap scum, i don't see a huge problem.
if the gop won't fund campaigns to replace warmongers like graham, let them have at it.
obviously running a candidate for president is stupid af.
More along these lines. A third party could make a difference locally and in Congress. Plus, the only way a party will survive and be viable is if it can successfully get candidates elected that actually stand for the party. Even if there’s traction, the standard uniparty strategy is to temporarily placate and assimilate a third party. It’s happened numerous times.
 
the 2 party system is irrevocably corrupt. having just 2 leads to the clown show in congress and the partisan judicial BS. if a 3rd party gained enough backing to put in about 6-10 senators and 100 or so reps,it might have something. similar to the system in Europe. and yes,that has its own problem set. the history of 3rd parties is as said above. Nader,Perot,TR all gave us poor outcomes. TR the worst. since the dims and reps always produce candidates that have no biz in power,many are willing to vote 3rd party. the story of the libertarian party is about the same. tends to pull votes that would go Rep in its absence. of course,getting a rep pres is never a very good outcome. Trump might be the exception but it is looking doubtful.
is Elon a liberty loving guy or a greedy corrupt one? opinions vary. i have no idea.
the hard lt had an easy time taking over the dim party. they were already numerous and deep in it's power base. taking over the rep won't happen. hasn't worked before. the corrupt war mongers that run it have control at every level and the $s to keep it.
 
I was one of the fools who voted for Perot because I foolishly believed he was serious. Yeah, that worked out…🙄
H. Ross was pretty sincere in what he said he wanted to do. The problem was that he was used as a "splitter," to weaken the chances for the other candidates.

This assumes one considers cast votes to be tallied votes, of course.

It may take folks a few years more, but I would hope that people are starting to see that the mechanisms of significant elections (meaning all Fed, almost all State, and surely big cities as well) as of 2025 are not to be trusted without a whole lot of inspections, and it has been this way ever since SCOTUS was asked to decide the "hanging chad" situation in its Bush v Gore decision.