If you don't support gun control, you don't support law enforcement

We are way past this point men. The govt is too far gone and the police force far to large for this to be an option. As it is now, you guys are more likely to hang.

The people should have the power to punish the criminals in this manner, not the police. Instead we have been brainwashed to accept and be at the mercy of the police state. It has always been the plan.
Unfortunately, you’re probably correct.
 
I know, I can’t understand unless I’m a union card holder of a police force


216059.jpg
 
Well you are stupid in this case. The Supreme Court has stated that police do not have to defend citizens.
It doesn't even matter. He puts out two things, one is reasonable, the other is unreasonable, then he equates them and says if you don't agree with the unreasonable one, then you don't agree with the reasonable one.

I find it perfectly reasonable that the police should aim to actively uphold the rights of citizens. I find it unreasonable that a police force of three would be assumed responsible to make Custer's last stand against a raiding team of ATF agents. Even more unreasonable without knowing any of the other circumstances.

It's garbage brain argument.
 
It’s 1000% unreasonable I expect police should have a duty to protect citizens and their rights, shit it’s all about keep your head down for 20 and collect that pension
Again, still doing it. You are substituting the reasonable claim, that they should protect citizens, for the unreasonable claim that local sheriff's offices should be responsible for providing QRFs agains the ATF under any and all circumstances.

Anybody who has been forced to read postmodernist, neo-Marxist twaddle is familiar with the form. You are just attempting to use it in the service of crude lolbertarianism.
 
Again, still doing it. You are substituting the reasonable claim, that they should protect citizens, for the unreasonable claim that local sheriff's offices should be responsible for providing QRFs agains the ATF under any and all circumstances.

Anybody who has been forced to read postmodernist, neo-Marxist twaddle is familiar with the form. You are just attempting to use it in the service of crude lolbertarianism.
As a much younger guy I fought much harder battles as a volunteer firefighter to save person and property. Poor welfare queens, fuck the protected class
 
Its as simple as this men. Police are here to protect the govt hierarchy. This is their job. Anything else you may believe is intentional brainwashing of the masses and the officers themselves to lessen the chance of rebellion and I can prove it.

What is stopping a good man today from ridding his city, county, state, and federal govt of these sick disgusting dictators we have in office? A good man knows where we are heading as a nation and why. Many of you here speak of it everyday. A good man understands what is in store for his children so why doesn’t he act when a heavy price will be paid by inaction? What about ridding his neighborhood of criminals. Why wouldn’t a man take out the trash to make his town safer for his children? What is his deterrent?

Feel free to answer the question and be honest.
 
Damn straight

Honestly #17 most deadly job, cry more than union teachers, no duty to protect person or property or rights, sorry useless be useless
Again, this is a strawman. I said originally that I have no intention on defending all cops, or policing as a profession. I simply said I wouldn't paint with a broad brush on this, or any other, group, and that my local sheriffs department was quite good. Have fun with all the rest.
 
Again, this is a strawman. I said originally that I have no intention on defending all cops, or policing as a profession. I simply said I wouldn't paint with a broad brush on this, or any other, group, and that my local sheriffs department was quite good. Have fun with all the rest.

Ok

I’ll dig that

Show me ONE, fucking one, video of a cop cuffing another cop who was violating another citizens rights during covid

Or trying to stop a unconstitutional ATF raid

etc

Just one!

That’s unfair, unions and pensions be sweet

One uniform cop “booing” a police official who got on stage to shit on citizens rights, just show me ONE
 
Ok

I’ll dig that

Show me ONE, fucking one, video of a cop cuffing another cop who was violating another citizens rights during covid

Or a ATF raid

etc

Just one!

That’s unfair, unions and pensions be sweet

One uniformed cop “booing” a police official who got on stage to shit on citizens rights, just show me ONE
You are back to the same form of garbage argument. I have no idea whether a cop cuffed another cop for violating rights. I don't believe the officers in my sheriff's office travel out of jurisdiction to go police places they aren't wanted, and I don't believe there has been an ATF raid in their jurisdiction either. And the only cops I have ever talked about are the ones with whom I have experience.

This was the official statement by our sheriff on detaining or fining people for covid violations:

"The statewide face covering order is a public health directive. It is not a mandate for law enforcement to issue citations and arrest violators. We urge you to take personal responsibility and be respectful of all Montana citizens."

I am guessing his officers followed these orders and did not require handcuffing for violating rights during covid.
 
You are back to the same form of garbage argument. I have no idea whether a cop cuffed another cop for violating rights. I don't believe the officers in my sheriff's office travel out of jurisdiction to go police places they aren't wanted, and I don't believe there has been an ATF raid in their jurisdiction either. And the only cops I have ever talked about are the ones with whom I have experience.

This was the official statement by our sheriff on detaining or fining people for covid violations:

"The statewide face covering order is a public health directive. It is not a mandate for law enforcement to issue citations and arrest violators. We urge you to take personal responsibility and be respectful of all Montana citizens."

I am guessing his officers followed these orders and did not require handcuffing for violating rights during covid.

So not one video nation wide?

most every person has a HD video camera in their pocket, YouTube or rumble is a click away, not one????
 
  • Like
Reactions: wade2big
My decision has been LONG made, since I was young. I do NOT support any kind of gun control. You CANNOT make me change my mind. You CANNOT persuade me. You CANNOT coerce or threaten me. If you say that I am whatever whatever for not supporting pussy ass cuck commie shit, IGHT FAM... SAY WHATEVER YO ASS WANNA SAY. I don't give a shit, dawg...
 
So not one video nation wide?
Again, I've never said anything about cops being good nationwide, statewide or even the town cops in my area being good, as I have never encountered one. Only my sheriff, and I have explicitly refrained from doing the other. You run from strawman to motte and bailey and back. None of them are proof of anything other than doggedness, which I admit I sort of admire.
 
If they would make a crime involving a weapon a death sentence 2 weeks after the trial there would be no reason to have gun control. But this shit hole can't get out of its own way because of corruption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: memtb
If they would make a crime involving a weapon a death sentence 2 weeks after the trial there would be no reason to have gun control. But this shit hole can't get out of its own way because of corruption.
“They” probably will. The crime punishable by death will be ownership.

Don’t wish for it to ever be easy for the state to issue death sentences. I would rather victims of crimes and/or their families serve it. Not the state. Remember that we are being taken over as we speak and who is gaining power.
 
Again, I've never said anything about cops being good nationwide, statewide or even the town cops in my area being good, as I have never encountered one. Only my sheriff, and I have explicitly refrained from doing the other. You run from strawman to motte and bailey and back. None of them are proof of anything other than doggedness, which I admit I sort of admire.

“Straw man” lol

If the industry who sells itself as protecting and serving won’t protect and serve your person/property/constitutional rights, it’s full of shit
 
Last edited:
“Straw man” lol

If the industry who sells itself as protecting and serving won’t protect and serve your person/property/constitutional rights, it’s full of shit
Yes, straw man. You have created for yourself an opponent that doesn't exist, who is making an argument nobody is making. Nobody, especially not me, is saying that you should support the police, that they are great, that the industry is the best etc. All I said was that my local constabulary is quite good, and that I am not willing to make broad statements otherwise. So, wanting a broad statement to rail against, you just create one. Your strawman. Cops are like anybody else. Some are good, some are bad. I am sure different areas and different department ethos attracts different people. To make these broad statements is just silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stefan73 and memtb
Yes, straw man. You have created for yourself an opponent that doesn't exist, who is making an argument nobody is making. Nobody, especially not me, is saying that you should support the police, that they are great, that the industry is the best etc. All I said was that my local constabulary is quite good, and that I am not willing to make broad statements otherwise. So, wanting a broad statement to rail against, you just create one. Your strawman. Cops are like anybody else. Some are good, some are bad. I am sure different areas and different department ethos attracts different people. To make these broad statements is just silly.

So nobody said they they are great

Mmmk

next sentence you said yours are “quite good”

So will yours stand up to unconstitutional actors?
 
So you didn’t say those two things?

I know all the kool kids say “straw man” but not so much
You are conflating a general statement "nobody said police are great" with the whole of police as the subject, with a particular statement, "the police in my county are good," which are linked by the personal statement that I won't make broad claims about any group, so yeah, I literally said exactly the opposite of what you suggest, but that is the strawman you've been trying to build the entire time. Or maybe you only see absolute general populations. Then you jump back in with your bailey about them only being good if they are personal QRFs for each resident.
 
I guess according to this commie fool I, a cop, oppose law enforcement. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Well according to the left, you can be a black man who isn't a "real black man" if you don't support CRT or BLMs racist bullshit

You can be a woman who is "not for women" if you believe in traditional gender roles, don't support the killing of unborn children, don't don't believe men belong in a women's bathroom


So it stands to reason that you can be a cop who "is against the cops" if you believe in some crazy idea like the constitution.
 

So the Miami-Dade police chief is calling for tighter federal gun control, and federal mandatory minimums for gun crimes. The title of this thread is basically what he stated about gun control: you're either with us, or against us.

I agree with the mandatory minimums idea, but I highly doubt the current federal administration will go for it. Somehow it unfairly targets minorities.
Lol, make even more against pd.
 
HANG the criminals. In the town square. Make it spectator sport again... so-as-to ACTUALLY have a deterrent to crime. Charge admission for tickets to the grandstands.
I no longer believe in this when criminal is defined by who you vote for. I have a good buddy, a US Army Ranger and then a contractor who is now a convicted felon. He lost his job and his security clearance. His "crime" was driving into NJ with an AR15 unloaded in his trunk and having faith in the police when he got pulled over.
 
Last edited:
Making it an automatic death sentence everytime a gun is used in a shooting doesn't really scare anyone. First of all how many of these mass shooters are actually captured alive? Most suicide themselves after killing a bunch of other people, or shoot it out with the police. Many criminals have already been to prison and have already decided they are not going back. When people are in a fit of rage, even the teenager that was going to stab that girl the other day until the cop shot her was not thinking about dying, she was in a blind rage and not listening to the cop that had to shoot her to save the other girls life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TurboTrout
I no longer believe in this when criminal is defined by who you vote for. I have a good buddy, a US Army Ranger and then a contractor who is now a convicted felon. He lost his job and his security clearance. His "crime" was driving into NJ with an AR15 unloaded in his trunk and having faith in the police when he got pulled over.
police are absolutely part of the problem
NJ is ridiculous but there is more here that is not being disclosed.
 
I no longer believe in this when criminal is defined by who you vote for. I have a good buddy, a US Army Ranger and then a contractor who is now a convicted felon. He lost his job and his security clearance. His "crime" was driving into NJ with an AR15 unloaded in his trunk and having faith in the police when he got pulled over.
His crime was allowing police to search his car
 
  • Like
Reactions: LMTMWS
If he said no they’d just have a dog show up and “alert”


These guys work for you @TurboTrout. They just doing there jobs. What a crock of shit that people are brainwashed and can’t seem to understand the truth. I used to be ignorant as well though.

How these DUI checkpoints were ever accepted I will never understand. Any officer that has ever taken part in one deserves the worst.
 
So, using the chiefs rational, if restricting my rights as a law abiding gun owner somehow will lower gun crime, and if he really believes this rational, then he should be an example to us all and have his dick cut off to prevent rapes, which are actually a much bigger problem. I mean after all, he’s running around with the primary tool used in rape and he apparently believes law abiding citizens getting rid of such a tool used in crime will reduce the amount of such a crime.

The 2018 Uniform Crime Report (UCR), which measures rapes that are known to police, estimated that there were 127,258 rapes reported to law enforcement in 2018.[13] The 2016 National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), which measures sexual assaults and rapes that may not have been reported to the police, estimated that there were 431,840 incidents of rape or sexual assault in 2015.[14]

Rape is a much larger problem, come on chief, show us you really believe what you are proposing and cut your dick off.

 
That coconut eating motherfucker can go get fucked. I guess I too am against law enforcement.
You have to be if you are a freedom loving American. We are way past supporting the men that make what we are dealing with today possible. Take a look at post #60 for an explanation. The truth is hard for many to accept when it goes against what a man has always believed.
 
So, using the chiefs rational, if restricting my rights as a law abiding gun owner somehow will lower gun crime, and if he really believes this rational, then he should be an example to us all and have his dick cut off to prevent rapes, which are actually a much bigger problem. I mean after all, he’s running around with the primary tool used in rape and he apparently believes law abiding citizens getting rid of such a tool used in crime will reduce the amount of such a crime.

The 2018 Uniform Crime Report (UCR), which measures rapes that are known to police, estimated that there were 127,258 rapes reported to law enforcement in 2018.[13] The 2016 National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), which measures sexual assaults and rapes that may not have been reported to the police, estimated that there were 431,840 incidents of rape or sexual assault in 2015.[14]

Rape is a much larger problem, come on chief, show us you really believe what you are proposing and cut your dick off.


If the cop really is worried about violence, he should give all his guns and all his officers guns to local CCW holders, as police have been found to be less law abiding than CCWs, and murder (like convicted murder) people at a rate 3x higher than CCW.

Have the “chief” PM me when he wants to hand over his weapons, I got room for a few more lol

The Violence Policy Center (VPC) says that Florida tops the nationin killings by people with concealed carry permits. VPC has complete years in their data base for 2008 – 2011 for Florida. There are 27 total killings that are unjustified homicides by CCW permit holders, and 14 of those are domestic homicides. The rate of domestic homicides per 100,000 per year is .583 per 100,000 for CCW holders.

The homicide rate nationally dropped from 5.4 to 4.7 per 100,000during this period, and the Florida homicide rate dropped from 6.4 to 5.2 per 100,000. Since we are only looking at CCW holders in Florida, we would expect those rates to be a bit higher than the national rate for this period.

When we look at the numbers for sworn officers, I found 52 domestic homicides committed by sworn police officers from 2008 – 2011. For the police, nationally from 2008 through 2011, the rate is 52/2,818,924 or 1.854/100,000 domestic homicides per 100,000 police per year.

For the data that we have, police appear to be three times as likely to commit murder as a concealed carry permit holder.”
 
Its as simple as this men. Police are here to protect the govt hierarchy. This is their job. Anything else you may believe is intentional brainwashing of the masses and the officers themselves to lessen the chance of rebellion and I can prove it.

What is stopping a good man today from ridding his city, county, state, and federal govt of these sick disgusting dictators we have in office? A good man knows where we are heading as a nation and why. Many of you here speak of it everyday. A good man understands what is in store for his children so why doesn’t he act when a heavy price will be paid by inaction? What about ridding his neighborhood of criminals. Why wouldn’t a man take out the trash to make his town safer for his children? What is his deterrent?

The ultimate deterrent is prison. But the proxy is law enforcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wade2big
The ultimate deterrent is prison. But the proxy is law enforcement.
Yes sir. The solution to the problems we face today would land you at the mercy of the bullshit justice system we have via the men we are told are here to serve and protect us. LOL.

Eventually this won’t be a deterrent any longer and is why I am an advocate for men to leave the force in mass. There are job openings everywhere considering the policies put in place by the criminals in charge. Now should be the easiest time for the good men in uniform to open their eyes and understand what their current job duties actually are and find new employment. Those left would be Facist (in the real meaning of the word) statists as this is the reality of the job as it is today.
 
Again, this is a strawman. I said originally that I have no intention on defending all cops, or policing as a profession. I simply said I wouldn't paint with a broad brush on this, or any other, group, and that my local sheriffs department was quite good. Have fun with all the rest.


Except you are defending all cops with a broad brush. Your local sheriff's department is quite good at what, exactly?

While you local sheriffs office might treat you royally today, if the law changed in a way you disliked and they had the opportunity to arrest you they would gladly arrest you tomorrow. Would you still be singing their praises then?

You local law enforcement along with the other 99% of cops utterly fail to enforce most laws against most criminals. With more than 10,000 gun laws currently on the books, that idiot in Miami has every tool known to man available to him to stop firearms crime and he is demanding more gun laws. Because he does not give a shit about the criminals who shot up the rapper concert, not in the least. He wants your guns first, not criminals or their guns.

This year, 2021, approximately 100,000 people will fail the NICS checks because they are felons, have warrants or restraining orders and they attempted to buy a firearm. The Federal government will charge approximately 80 of them with the crime. Fourteen of them will get convicted. 14 out of 100,000.

The homicide rate for African Americans males is 37 per 100,000. By arresting criminals with guns and prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law, Miami asshole chief and his asshole patrol buddies can save lives, but they don't and they won't. Neither will your sheriff.
 
Except you are defending all cops with a broad brush. Your local sheriff's department is quite good at what, exactly?

While you local sheriffs office might treat you royally today, if the law changed in a way you disliked and they had the opportunity to arrest you they would gladly arrest you tomorrow. Would you still be singing their praises then?

You local law enforcement along with the other 99% of cops utterly fail to enforce most laws against most criminals. With more than 10,000 gun laws currently on the books, that idiot in Miami has every tool known to man available to him to stop firearms crime and he is demanding more gun laws. Because he does not give a shit about the criminals who shot up the rapper concert, not in the least. He wants your guns first, not criminals or their guns.

This year, 2021, approximately 100,000 people will fail the NICS checks because they are felons, have warrants or restraining orders and they attempted to buy a firearm. The Federal government will charge approximately 80 of them with the crime. Fourteen of them will get convicted. 14 out of 100,000.

The homicide rate for African Americans males is 37 per 100,000. By arresting criminals with guns and prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law, Miami asshole chief and his asshole patrol buddies can save lives, but they don't and they won't. Neither will your sheriff.
No, I really am not defending every cop with a broad brush. I specifically said I had no opinion on cops I don't know, and have never dealt with. They don't particularly treat me royally, but our sheriff and his predecessor have been two of the people leading the charge on both constitutional carry in my state, and in fed nullification, and, as I posted above, were clear that they would not be policing the state mandates on Covid. There are other things that I will not post here, which also give me confidence in them. I have also dealt with them personally.

I live in the ruralist of rural Montana. This isn't fucking Miami, and the sheriff in my area is actually advocating, in writing and in deed, for the exact opposite of what you are saying. We don't have rap concerts here. We don't really have criminals incidents outside of the occasional bar fight, and they are not called in for those. The biggest event in the area is a once yearly rodeo. Again, this isn't Miami, and the sheriff here isn't Art Acevedo. That is my entire point, that you can only judge them based on their policies or actions, not based on some dude that is six hours away by plane in a place I don't particularly enjoy visiting.

While I don't feel like engaging in black vs white, there are also exactly zero black people in my town. I believe there are 40 black people in my county, and it has an area of 2500 or so square miles. As far as I know, the homicide rate for them is exactly zero, as is the homicide rate for the county for at least the last 6 years.

Now, I have lived other places with awful police, and, as I have said, I am sure as hell not going to defend them as an industry. But I wouldn't defend the entirety of any industry either, nor would I condemn the entirety of any industry. That would be ridiculous. That is my only point. It seems, frankly, bizarre that the only possible position to take on this forum is that all cops are totally bad. Take, for example, @pmclaine. I believe he is police. I also may have my disagreements with him, but I do not believe that he is out there looking to take away constitutional rights. I also don't believe he would run, M1 Garand in hand, into every ATF raid in his state like a one man QRF. That would be ridiculous. Have some sense. There are good and bad of everything. Cops, judges, military, bankers, machinists, whatever you are looking for, the population in that group is going to be decidedly mixed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: stefan73
If he said no they’d just have a dog show up and “alert”


You know, i have had that happen to me 3x with border patrol. On the third time i called them out on their bs and was pretty pissed off, told them to give me a warrant for wanting to go through my vehicle. They tried to give me some bs and i shredded that. Told them to fuck off. They did and i went on my way. Have not been stopped at a bp checkpoint since. I went through them for years multiple times a week. Work and pleasure.

Douche tried to give me some “the dog alerted us to possible blablabla”. Ha! Cause its real hard giving a dog a command to “alert” on any vehicle they want. With facial recognition, plate readers and all that, its real easy to know who comes theough the stops and how often, flagging you and your vehicle. With the dog they have reasonable cause. Uh huh. They said “ well are you the original owner, how do uou onow someone with drugs or an illegal never have been inside this vehicle” line of shit. I said “oh my, you are right! Then why didn’t you stop me the last 600x’s i came through here?” Your dog must be broken back then! Oh, or is your dog broken now?” After sitting there for 15-20 minutes they told me I was free to go(sure they called about a warrant and got denied).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TurboTrout