Re: LEGION
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BigBoss0311</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Dammit. I do not understand how you all liked this. I thought it was abysmal. Let me set this up: there I was, all ready for a badass flick about angels fighting and then they came out with that crap. I mean come on. Are you telling me that an archangel is going to use a Uzi or a shotgun to fight each other?!?!?!?! WTF?!?!?! I mean,ANGELS FIGHTING! There should have been bone crunching punches, badass sparing, a sword or two clashing. They should have unleashed absolute destruction! But apparently an angel can't fight without an AR15. Whatever. And zombie angels? Who the hell thought of that? That guy needs to be kicked in the balls. Since when do angels need to possess humans just to attack a baby? If an angel had wanted that baby, it would have ripped open the sky and taken that damn kid. But hey now I know, if an angel is trying to take my kid, I can hole up in a gas station with an 870 and some buckshot and hold out for days. Gay. Just gay. Ok rant off. </div></div>
gotta agree. i wanted this movie to be great. the premise of angelic hosts attacking mankind had promise. should have been epic...just wasnt. only good scene was the posessed grama. i really thought theyd take it towards a mix of sitchin mythology and throw in some good "raised dead army" for good measure, but they fell way short of the mark. cheesy angels all two of them.