• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Rifle Scopes Leupold 3-18x44mm TMR quick review

Ledzep

Bullet Engineer
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Jun 9, 2009
    4,526
    6,109
    Hornady
    A month or two ago I snagged one of these for $1900 from cheaper than dirt. After some research on said company, I'm a little ashamed for giving them money. Oh well.

    On to the scope. Overall impressions is that it's a really nice scope. It's shorter and lighter than everything in a similar zoom range that I'm aware of. The clarity is great, on par with my NF NXS 3.5-15x50, if not a touch better. Honestly I can't see anything with one that I can't with the other, but there's a ton of mirage here around Vegas. I need to print out some increasingly smaller numbers/letters and see how far away I can read them with each. I ran it through a 2 mil box drill and it performed perfectly, after taking the target back home and measuring, all groups are 7.1-7.4" from each other. I also ran it up 5 mils and back down to zero firing a shot every 1 mil and it passed that as well. I ran it from zero to max elevation and back and it returns to zero. The only problems I have are relatively minor, and are with the elevation turret, and the reticle. I'll get to those later.

    Out of the box, the scope comes with and allen wrench, butler creek front and back flip up caps, a user manual, and a Horus "reticle supplement". My scope has the TMR reticle, and I didn't see anything for it anywhere in either manual (not that I need it, it would just be nice). It's a short & fat scope-- the 34mm tube is definitely beefy compared to 30mm and 1" tubes. I mounted it onto an old .308 I built in highschool with Warne 34mm low rings. It's a mauser 98 action with an $89 Adams & Bennett barrel, glass beded into it's stock. No blueprinting, I finished the chamber by hand, and it's a 1-1.25 MOA shooter. It was the only bolt action that I was willing to remove the scope from to put this Mk6 on to test it. Once my .260 build gets back from Chad Dixon, this scope is going onto that rifle. I also put a Vortex 34mm level on it. Both the Warne Rings and Vortex level installed just fine, no issues there.

    Looking through the scope at a white wall, and going through the magnification zoom, you can see the image get significantly darker past ~10x. It's not so easy to notice while looking at open terrain and hasn't caused any issues while actually shooting yet. Being FFP, the mil-scale zooms in and out with the picture, and is accurate at all magnification levels. The scope is very clear across all magnifications. At 18x, the reticle is a bit thick for my liking, and at 3x it's way too thin. I think most of my work with this scope will be done between 6x and 12x. The hole in the middle of the cross is not that great for aiming. Unless there is really good contrast between the target point and it's background, the target point gets lost very easily. I was aiming at a 1/2" black dot on brown cardboard with some light mirage @100yd and had some real trouble finding it. I would much prefer a .5mil gap and a small .05 mil dot in the center, or perhaps the inner most .5 mil cross be super-thin, .05 mils or so. Nothing I can do about it, though :)

    The fit/finish is great on this scope. Although I suspect it's not quite as tough as my NXS's, it's still rugged enough. I don't have any proof to support this, but my guess is that it's body is made from a softer aluminum than what NF uses. Anyway, if someone was going to bang them against each other I'd bet on the NF. Probably a result of it being several oz. lighter.

    The turrets do leave something to be desired. The windage turret is just fine. Tactile, audible clicks, tracks well etc.. No problems. It's numbered every 0.5 mils left and right for 5 mils either way. The elevation turret, however, has some issues. It has the squeeze-button lock system, so you have to press the two sides of the turret together to spin it. That works fine, and I get 20 mils of elevation (2 revs). The problem is that when you don't push those buttons in, you can still spin the turret (no clicks or reticle movement) a full .1 mil hash mark on the indicating ring. Essentially, I can have the scope set at 1.0 mils up from zero, but can move the turret to indicate either "1.0", or "0.9". To combat this, I've started turning past my desired mark when going down, then coming back up to where I want it. (for example, going from 2.1 mils to 1.7 mils I will first go to "1.5" then back up to 1.7. If I go straight down from 2.1 to 1.7, I'll end up at 1.8 with .1 mil backlash saying I'm on 1.7, if that makes sense). Similar to how you adjust for backlash on machinery indicator dials. The indicating ring also pivots on the two spring-loaded pins that hold it in place. The indicator ring does not freely rotate at all, just pivots side to side. Here's a video showing what I mean.

    318x44mk6 Elevation turret twist and tilt - YouTube

    The parallax turret is fine, easy to adjust, not stiff, not loose. (edit) Also, the zero-stop is easy to set up following the instructions in the owner's manual and works very well.

    Here are a few pictures I took today out in the desert doing my box test.
    318e_zpsd8a6c3aa.jpg

    318f_zps62295ef5.jpg


    These next few are not representative of the clarity actually seen through the scope. I wish I had a better camera. That said, you can sort of see the box drill on the cardboard.
    318a_zpsd904d371.jpg

    318b_zps9fcda2ae.jpg

    318c_zpsbb873a09.jpg

    318d_zps923ac395.jpg



    edit to add: the bloom at the top of the view through the scope is from looking towards the sun. It's not usually there.
     
    Last edited:
    Thanks. I was leery of Leupolds to be honest, having heard about canted reticles and various other issues and historically I've had 4 NF NXS's, but I wanted something lighter and FFP for this .260 I'm having built. I like it. I'm not going to go off and replace my NXS's, but this mk6 definitely has a place here. I'm curious to see how it holds up with repeated use.

    I set it side by side with my NF NXS 2.5-10x32, 3.5-15x50, and my old SWFA 10x42 (non-HD). Looking out of my open window to the desert, all set as close to 10x as I can get them, the Mk6 and NXS's are pretty equal. Still, I can't find any details with one that I can't with the others. There are quite a few that the NXS and Mk6 scopes can see that the SWFA cannot. Screw holes on a metal power line pole ~300yd away can be seen with the mk6 and NXS's but not the SWFA. The SWFA is also darker and has a red tint and some noticeable chromatic aboration. With the 3-18 and 3.5-15x50 NXS side by side both at 15x, it's a similar situation. Can't see anything with one that I can't with the other. I will say this, however, the NXS is definitely easier to aim with past 12x because the FFP TMR reticle gets so thick.

    I also forgot to mention that my Mk6 has no illumination. For me that's a plus because I don't ever use it anyway, and it's less weight and knobs to contend with, but some people like to use it so I suppose it's worth mentioning.
     
    Really excellent review Leadzep. Very interesting scope. It's hard to overstate the value and unusualness of the light weight of this optic. I also think the hunting class will love the quick change BDC scale system that turret has. The scale just snaps on and snaps off. I like the pinch and turn turrets just fine playing with them but I'm sad to here that they display that kind of lash. I really don't think a scope in this price range should have lash. Speaking of that, have you checked the parallax adjustment for lash. In the past Leupolds have been known to have this problem though they have told me that it is not an issue anymore. All in all an interesting scope to be sure and, importantly, not an also ran as it has a very unique feature set.