I suppose I could call Manners and ask them their view of the benefits of paying an extra $55 for a 90% carbon fiber shell, but I figured I'd probably get better responses from my fellow SH forum readers because several of you have likely purchased and fielded them; I value your independent feedback much more.
The stocks are already "composite" to begin with, so I presume that going to a 90% carbon fiber shell might shave ~ 1/2 lb off the weight. Does it make the stock stronger as well? What about brittleness? Are there any downsides to the 90% carbon fiber besides the weight?
Thanks!
(The stock I was thinking about eventually getting is the MCS T3, and fitting to a Surgeon XL w/ DBM and a fluted heavy (bull) sporter 26" barrel.)
The stocks are already "composite" to begin with, so I presume that going to a 90% carbon fiber shell might shave ~ 1/2 lb off the weight. Does it make the stock stronger as well? What about brittleness? Are there any downsides to the 90% carbon fiber besides the weight?
Thanks!

(The stock I was thinking about eventually getting is the MCS T3, and fitting to a Surgeon XL w/ DBM and a fluted heavy (bull) sporter 26" barrel.)