I'm in the market for a lighter scope and have narrowed it down to these two.
Any thoughts on the ffp March 3-24x52 vs the NX8?
Any thoughts on the ffp March 3-24x52 vs the NX8?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Duckhunter did bring up a good point I missed. At low power March does have a more usable/visible reticle. Don't know why NF put so much drop on this line.
Didn't have issues with eye box on either one. Sure while in handy they seem tight, but once mounted they were fine. The parallax is just something different to get use to.
Challenge now is finding one in stock somewhere.Thanks a lot guys very useful info.
Sounds like the March glass is a clear winner.
Liking the looks of the fma-2 reticle with the floating dot in the center, very similar to the PR-1 moa on my MK5 which I love
What do you mean by "March is a train wreck now"?Yeah no shit
Apparently March is a train wreck right now!
The earliest I can get one is over 8 weeks so not gonna work for this season.
I just ordered the 4-32 NX8 so I should have it next week.
Really hoping it works out, I'm getting tired of pulling scopes
By train wreck I'm referring to their situation with mega mega backorder issues.What do you mean by "March is a train wreck now"?
They are a small Japanese company that designs, builds and sells innovative, top quality scopes. They build their riflescopes by hand and virtually to order, all from Japanese parts, not one bit of Chinese junk in there.
The China virus situation is not helping the supply chain and shipping but they are making and selling their riflescopes.
I wish you good luck with your purchase.
Yeah, that's not what happened, so you should stop spreading that false rumor. Also, repairs do not take a long time. I have not needed repair on my March but I did send it in for a reticle change and it was back within 3 weeks. There is currently a shipping issue due to COVID but one hopes that is temporary. And yes, if NF is next door, it makes a whole lot of sense to buy local, especially for the service.By train wreck I'm referring to their situation with mega mega backorder issues.
I spoke with several vendors and they used the exact term to describe the current business situation with the parent company, and it happened before covid..
They cancelled the dealer they were working with in WA state and now even repairs can take months and months to fix since everything is exclusively done in Japan.
I'd love to have one of their scopes but the business situation DEFINITELY played a part on my decision to stick with NF.
The NF HQ is literally 50 miles from my home so buy local I guess
Sorry what part is a false rumor??Yeah, that's not what happened, so you should stop spreading that false rumor. Also, repairs do not take a long time. I have not needed repair on my March but I did send it in for a reticle change and it was back within 3 weeks. There is currently a shipping issue due to COVID but one hopes that is temporary. And yes, if NF is next door, it makes a whole lot of sense to buy local, especially for the service.
Here's a few facts home sliceBoth parts were wrong or outdated, so you're 0 for 2 and I don't care where you got it from.
I communicated with Deon overnight and they confirm that production is at 4 weeks. Several months back they announced that they had found a way to reduce production lead time down to 4 weeks. It has been 4 weeks for many months now.
They posted this today.
And this was the original post about how they had achieved a reduction in manufacturing lead time to 1 month (4 weeks).
They do have some stocking dealers in the US and around the world, but the problem is they make many different riflescope models and even worse, each model is available with several different reticles. Since this is not mass-production of the same scope over and over again, keeping stock is a nightmare. When I selected my latest March riflescope, I selected the exact options and reticle I wanted and ordered it. It took a little over 5 weeks from placing the order to my doorstep, and it arrived with exactly the features and specs I wanted and it's been absolutely awesome. If I'm going to pay that kind of money for the very best riflescope, I'm happy to wait 4-5 weeks and have the exact one I want.
It's the same thing when I bought my last vehicle. I ordered it with the exact color, engine size, and myriad options and features I wanted, waited 7 weeks and took delivery of exactly what I wanted and had ordered.
At the risk of going further off topic, any idea if the newer wide angle scopes will eventually have MOA reticles as an option?
Eventually, but that may be a while yet.At the risk of going further off topic, any idea if the newer wide angle scopes will eventually have MOA reticles as an option?
The FFP scopes are heavily favored by the folks who like MIL-based reticles, and with trees. So let me ask you this. If there were MOA reticle for these FFP scopes with the wide angle eyepiece, what format would you like to see it in? For example, do you want a tree reticle but based on MOA? Do you want simpler reticles like some of the MTR series? What would you use the riflescope for, hunting, target shooting, competition? If competition, what type?
Thanks for the reply. If you have further thoughts, please post them here or PM me. I'm going to do some more research before passing it along.I'm one of those odd guys that shoots MOA in tactical matches. I mostly do local matches, but occasionally also do regional matches. Once or twice a year I'll do a local F-Class match. Our local tactical matches include PRS style steel matches and long range (200-1000yd) courses with paper targets. I would be interested in the wide angle scopes primarily for those competitions, but might also use them for hunting. I currently use March 3-24 scopes on my hunting rifles and 7-35 Nightforce ATACRS on my competition rifles. I've used the March 3-24 scope in completion, but the ATACRs have it beat for competitive events. Just for context, i would about 10% of the shooters in our matches use MOA scopes; most of us started out with MOA scopes as hunters and never saw enough reason to switch to MOA.
I'm pretty happy with FMA reticle, I don't really like the tree style reticles (although the choices for MOA tree style reticles are pretty limited).