I believe that there is a review of it on here if you search. I was going to go with it until I seen the SB 6X36 for my 28nos
I found a couple reviews but it looked like the old model without the turret locks.
That’s the only fundamental change I’m aware of and everyone who's played with the new turrets says they rock.
Thanks for the feedback!
If you enjoyed the 3-24x42 you will absolutely love the 4.5-28x52, it is a better scope in practically every way - optically, mechanically, ergonomically. The new Shuriken lock turrets are the real deal and some of the best turrets out there, locking mechanism is ingenious.
Spot on, FOV is one of the best features of this scope and really differentiates it from almost all other FFP scopes on the market today. You really don't know how much of a difference this makes until you actually see what you haven't been able to see (with other scopes).
I believe they are different internally and therefore cannot be replaced.
It is awesome.
I have this on my lightweight 6.5 PRC. It has become my go to rifle for pretty much everything and is probably my favorite scope.
Well you didn't tell me this was for a lightweight 6.5 PRC, here's my lightweight 6.5 PRC and it just so happens to be where I'm using my 4.5-28 this year
Keep in mind I really like the ATACR 4-16x42, but if you can pay the extra for the March 4.5-28x52 then it offers so much more...Oh man. I have almost the same setup. LRH stock, proof barrel, M5 DBM. Good. Looking gun.Well you didn't tell me this was for a lightweight 6.5 PRC, here's my lightweight 6.5 PRC and it just so happens to be where I'm using my 4.5-28 this year
View attachment 8362030
View attachment 8362031
Yep, Manners LRH with mini-chassis and arca rail, Defiance anTi X and 18" Proof CF barrel, I absolutely love this rifle as it is such a great all rounder, you will love yours!Oh man. I have almost the same setup. LRH stock, proof barrel, M5 DBM. Good. Looking gun.
Oooh, let me go throw on my 8oz Ultra 5
Seriously, we are not alone So Cold_Bore, I think it's settled... let's see your pic in a month or two Hopefully I’ll have it in my hands sooner than that! But I will repost it.Oooh, let me go throw on my 8oz Ultra 5
Looking back at IWA 2024 scope offerings i have seen , it seems we are in for a wave of new wide-angle scopes in the future , all the chinese OEMs had some models with wide angle eyepieces so only a question of time before brands offer those under their labels.
Most importantly this scope is tough and tracks true.
I actually ran into this issue with my 3-24x42 on a LA. The scope sits about 1 pic rail forward of where I want it to. I ended up adjusting the stock a little to get proper relief.
I ran into similar with mine using ARC rings, I went to Spuhr and that helped solve the issue, the new Shuriken lock turrets are a little higher with larger numbers which may make this easier. Doesn't help you but if others should see this post it is just something to be aware of.
I have a Shuriken model with a Spuhr mount and can confirm the markings on the top turret are above the mounting rings. That said, I need to rotate the rear flip cover so it’s not blocking my view.
If you’re referring to the anount of adjustment from factory zero then yes, that is acceptable, I’ve had worse adjustments then that and had the scopes perform just fine.
When I ordered mine, I asked CS at Euro Optic if they’ve had any returns and they said no. I think with March you are paying for the scope whereas with Vortex you are paying for the warranty.
Appreciate the reply, I rarely see a bench rest, mostly running through courses of fire so I want to make sure it can hold up to abuse like an ATACR— rattle canned and abusedWhen I ordered mine, I asked CS at Euro Optic if they’ve had any returns and they said no. I think with March you are paying for the scope whereas with Vortex you are paying for the warranty.
The throw lever seems like an afterthought, has anyone found a more durable solution? Glass looks incredible…I’ve only had mine for 2 range sessions, bench and prone, so it’s too early to assess durability. The plastic throw lever is meant to break away if you bump it into something. I don’t think March spared any expense, considering there are no internal plastic parts. Also beneficial is the 4mm thick aluminum tube. March has a 10 year warranty, but I don’t think it covers what they deem improper use, so that should factor into your decision. They will, however, fix your scope for a fee.Appreciate the reply, I rarely see a bench rest, mostly running through courses of fire so I want to make sure it can hold up to abuse like an ATACR— rattle canned and abused
Let me address the throw lever thing. It is not an afterthought; it is actually cleverly designed. It is inexpensive, it is some type of polymer (plastic), it is light, and it is designed to breakaway if hit hard. This way, it will not mar the surface of the riflescope, and if it hits something, it will fall off in two pieces instead of bending your scope or messing up your erector tube or gouging out flesh in your hand or face. It it comes apart, say a silent thank you there is no damage to the riflescope or you, pick up the two pieces and snap them back together on the magnification ring. Easy peasy. If you lose it, it's not a big expense.Appreciate the reply, I rarely see a bench rest, mostly running through courses of fire so I want to make sure it can hold up to abuse like an ATACR— rattle canned and abused
I can appreciate their approach to design for sure. How hard are we talking though, if it snags on gear exiting a vehicle is it going to pop off and end up in the dirt?
It's got to be a pretty hard hit. I have one on my F-TR rifle, and it has never come apart. It's been to scores of matches, all around the continent.
