Re: MIL/MIL fixed 10x choices?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JRose</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I guess it's just hard to distinguish b/c when I order a USO, there is no "cheap model" and "better model".
I'm not saying the SS isn't good, it's just priced at a point to where I'd rather have a USO, strictly from my past experiences with both lines.</div></div>
J, did you not understand what SWFA is telling you...
The new Super Snipers are not to be confused with the older models, so you going back on past experience doesn't really work because it's a completely different animal.
As many like to say here, Apples to Oranges.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 10x42 HD has nothing to do with the original scopes. They share no common components and are not even made in the same factory. They are two totally different animals. The HD and new 3-9 are vastly superior in every aspect (construction, durability, light transmission, clarity, turrets, etc.) when compared to the original line. You can very easily realize it simply by handling one.</div></div>
Having personally used them, and having used the older model, they are nothing alike. In fact I kept the Super Snipers sent over that were used in the videos and I continue to use and loan them out to replace broken scopes. They have held up great, run without issue and are well worth the money, in fact worth more that what they charge for them.
This is a common misconception because the Super Sniper line has a history prior, the re-introduction of the line cannot be compared to past models, this is misleading to anyone looking to buy a high quality optic at a great price.
I would recommend seeing the new models and using them before judging them on a past name.