C
captrichardson
Guest
I have tried to search the Net and here, but really couldn't find anything.
Ran a Millett TRS 4-16x50 through the paces today, and was having problems trying to use the Mil Dot Reticle for ranging.
Compared to 2 other scopes, Leupold & Nightforce, the TRS was not reading the same. When the 2 other scopes were reading 7 Mils, the TRS was reading 6 Mils. When the other 2 were reading 2 Mils, the TRS was reading 1.5 Mils.
Anyone else had a similar experience?
I am not sure if this is just "Millett Quality", or if there is something wrong with the scope. Not sure if the Reticle could be that far out of spec? Not sure if the magnification is not where it should be?
Trying to decide if this is something that Millett might be able to fix/correct, or if it is just the way the scope is made?
Thanks!
M Richardson
Ran a Millett TRS 4-16x50 through the paces today, and was having problems trying to use the Mil Dot Reticle for ranging.
Compared to 2 other scopes, Leupold & Nightforce, the TRS was not reading the same. When the 2 other scopes were reading 7 Mils, the TRS was reading 6 Mils. When the other 2 were reading 2 Mils, the TRS was reading 1.5 Mils.
Anyone else had a similar experience?
I am not sure if this is just "Millett Quality", or if there is something wrong with the scope. Not sure if the Reticle could be that far out of spec? Not sure if the magnification is not where it should be?
Trying to decide if this is something that Millett might be able to fix/correct, or if it is just the way the scope is made?
Thanks!
M Richardson