Re: Modern falling block rifles
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jedi</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ok if i ever have coin in my pocket and see one local
Dakota model 10
But as this design typically allows for OAL of rifle to be approx 4" shorter than a bolt gun of same barrel length
And well they are just bomb proof actions and sooooooo sexy
Which of the more affordable is better
Browning/Win 1895
ruger model 1
EABCO model 97
or any other i may have overlooked
TIA
</div></div>
If you ever have the coin, skip the Dakota and go straight to Martini & Hagn :
http://www.martiniandhagngunmakers.com/singleshots.htm
I'm not in love with the Eabco, reminds me too much of the Contender - which I view as being a 1/2 step above the H & R. Never have owned a Browning/winchester, though I would like to. I have one Ruger No.1, my brother has two. His are both standards, one in 22/250, the other in .280. Both will shoot MOA or better with good loads. Mine is the Varmint, in 6mm Remington. Only thing on any of them that is not factory are the scopes. My 6mm has a very nice trigger, clean and crisp. Never measured it's pull weight, but then I never felt the need to. It shoots 3/4 MOA with 95 gr Berger VLD's. At 200yds, that opens to an even MOA. I'm not complaining. Of all my rifles (all factory, no full customs yet), only my 7mm magnum Sendero will equal that.
They are what they are, nice looking rifles, that sometimes shoot well. YMMV.
Kaiser Norton