More lies revealed. Oil didn’t come from Dino bones 42 miles deep

BurtG

GOLDEN TICKET HOLDER
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Nov 9, 2022
    8,969
    30,224
    Northeast
    They lied again ? Shocking



    IMG_7737.jpeg
     
    Its been known since day 1 that oil was not from "decayed dinosaur remains", its was purely a marketing thing. As for how its made, I read a research paper on it which said its self renewing. Yes its a few hundred years, but it does certainly replenish some how. It lost me with some technical jargon on the exact process.
     
    The currently used model of subsurface oil, coal, gas production works. Its predictable and usable. "Dinosaurs" are not a critical part of the model, that's just silly hyperbole to make things memorable to those knuckleheads whose simple minds are easily blown. Coastal wetlands and bogs produce loads of buried organic material.

    The alternative hypothesis of deep earth production (which is actually pretty old, I learned about it in undergrad school 50 years ago) does not work. It's actually been tested by intelligently designed deep (really deep) drilling programs and the amount and types of oil recovered is easily attributable to the hydraulic systems used to do the drilling. Furthermore the deep earth temperatures are high enough to destroy complex molecules like hydrocarbons, not produce them. Nobody spends money on trying to produce oil from deep earth sources because it doesn't work.

    I know that recent events have caused elevated skepticism about a lot of things, but lets not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
    Clinically demonstratable ineffectiveness.
     
    They lied again ? Shocking



    View attachment 8786200

    weirdalfoil_134321.png


    The currently used model of subsurface oil, coal, gas production works. Its predictable and usable. "Dinosaurs" are not a critical part of the model, that's just silly hyperbole to make things memorable to those knuckleheads whose simple minds are easily blown. Coastal wetlands and bogs produce loads of buried organic material.

    The alternative hypothesis of deep earth production (which is actually pretty old, I learned about it in undergrad school 50 years ago) does not work. It's actually been tested by intelligently designed deep (really deep) drilling programs and the amount and types of oil recovered is easily attributable to the hydraulic systems used to do the drilling. Furthermore the deep earth temperatures are high enough to destroy complex molecules like hydrocarbons, not produce them. Nobody spends money on trying to produce oil from deep earth sources because it doesn't work.

    I know that recent events have caused elevated skepticism about a lot of things, but lets not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
    Clinically demonstratable ineffectiveness.
    youknow-you.png
     

    Attachments

    • 1760366772018.jpeg
      1760366772018.jpeg
      80.4 KB · Views: 2
    • Like
    Reactions: Gemsbok
    The currently used model of subsurface oil, coal, gas production works. Its predictable and usable. "Dinosaurs" are not a critical part of the model, that's just silly hyperbole to make things memorable to those knuckleheads whose simple minds are easily blown. Coastal wetlands and bogs produce loads of buried organic material.

    The alternative hypothesis of deep earth production (which is actually pretty old, I learned about it in undergrad school 50 years ago) does not work. It's actually been tested by intelligently designed deep (really deep) drilling programs and the amount and types of oil recovered is easily attributable to the hydraulic systems used to do the drilling. Furthermore the deep earth temperatures are high enough to destroy complex molecules like hydrocarbons, not produce them. Nobody spends money on trying to produce oil from deep earth sources because it doesn't work.

    I know that recent events have caused elevated skepticism about a lot of things, but lets not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
    Clinically demonstratable ineffectiveness.
    IMG_6325.gif
     
    There is a reason why the "abiogenic petroleum hypothesis" is not widely accepted by the scientific community. My brother in law has written several books about oil and gas. If oil is abiogenic, why is it full of bio markers?
     
    We have a 3 mile wide, 300M yo impact crater here in Central MO (Decaturville Impact), part of the 38th parallel series, and no oil here.
     
    Do all the Hydrocarbons on the moon Titan come from dead dinosaurs?
    Saturn's moon Titan has abundant liquid hydrocarbons, including methane and ethane, that are similar to but not the same as oil and natural gas found on Earth. These hydrocarbons are derived from the planet's vast organic chemical inventory and form lakes and dunes on Titan's surface, containing more of these substances than all of Earth's known fossil fuel reserves.



    Titan's "Hydrocarbon Oil"
    • Composition:
      On Titan, the liquid hydrocarbons are primarily methane and ethane, which are gases on Earth but remain liquid in Titan's frigid temperatures.
    • Formation:
      These compounds are produced from the breakdown of organic molecules by ultraviolet light from the Sun, creating a "giant factory of organic chemicals".
    • Abundance:
      Titan's surface contains hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than Earth's oil and gas reserves.
    • Location:
      These liquid hydrocarbons collect in large lakes, seas, and rivers, with notable bodies like Ligeia Mare
    Distinction from Earth's Oil
      • Origin:
        Unlike Earth's oil, which forms from the remains of ancient organisms, Titan's hydrocarbons are created abiogenically (without life) through geological and atmospheric processes.
    • Definition:
      While the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, Titan's hydrocarbons do not strictly meet the definition of "oil" or "natural gas" as understood on Earth, which implies a biological origin.
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: supercorndogs
    Why don’t we run a hose from Titan to Earth and stop harmful pumping on earth. Plus, if we pull too much out of the Earth it will shrink like a leaky balloon, and we don’t want that. All the islands will flip over and Florida will be drawn closer to Haiti, and we definitely don’t wanna get any closer to that shithole!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: BurtG
    Saturn's moon Titan has abundant liquid hydrocarbons, including methane and ethane, that are similar to but not the same as oil and natural gas found on Earth. These hydrocarbons are derived from the planet's vast organic chemical inventory and form lakes and dunes on Titan's surface, containing more of these substances than all of Earth's known fossil fuel reserves.



    Titan's "Hydrocarbon Oil"
    • Composition:
      On Titan, the liquid hydrocarbons are primarily methane and ethane, which are gases on Earth but remain liquid in Titan's frigid temperatures.
    • Formation:
      These compounds are produced from the breakdown of organic molecules by ultraviolet light from the Sun, creating a "giant factory of organic chemicals".
    • Abundance:
      Titan's surface contains hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than Earth's oil and gas reserves.
    • Location:
      These liquid hydrocarbons collect in large lakes, seas, and rivers, with notable bodies like Ligeia Mare
    Distinction from Earth's Oil
      • Origin:
        Unlike Earth's oil, which forms from the remains of ancient organisms, Titan's hydrocarbons are created abiogenically (without life) through geological and atmospheric processes.
    • Definition:
      While the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, Titan's hydrocarbons do not strictly meet the definition of "oil" or "natural gas" as understood on Earth, which implies a biological origin.
    Once again proving my point, AI is retarded.

    Organic compounds are chemical compounds that contain carbon (C) atoms, usually bonded to hydrogen (H), and often to other elements such as oxygen (O), nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), and halogens (like chlorine (Cl) and fluorine (F)). They are called “organic” because they were once thought to come only from living organisms. Today, we know that organic compounds can also be synthesized in laboratories. [1-4]

    Methane CH4
    Petrol C8H18
     
    Last edited: