• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

I avoid almost all of CA like the plague. There is no good reason to go there.

That same grid lock happens around South Tahoe in the summer, and Reno around Hot August Nights, Street Vibrations and Burning Man. Have I ever said I fucking hate burners?

u8N8xphB16DZx5S9WFTSlTIEUSBmJ30NYvESSuNE1GM.jpg


90


BMJ_trash-vendor.jpg


1200x0.jpg


rdqd4f5qn3k11.png
Yeah, my guess is that burners are all a bunch of pigs.

I had a co worker tell me that he wanted to go to BM. I told him he was nuts. He just looked at me funny. I just looked back at him funny.........
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash and 168BTHPM
Rich Cutrone didn't take the picture you posted. Somewhere way back in this thread, this was already addressed, but the fact that we are over 4200 pages now excuses that a bit. The real pic is -

1635256437_43-xphoto-name-p-black-lingerie-porn-51.jpg
So he just put his watermark on the photo because?


1684724046184.png
 
Last edited:
Dude -

You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?

I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash
And I ain't saying he didn't watermark the pic you posted. I'm saying that what you posted was photoshopped, either over or in addition to his watermark.
 
Dude -

You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?

I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
Can you furnish proof sources, I think I did.
Dude -

You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?

I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
No I have just you saying some bullshit like your's is the original but under close review the pixels are altered to erase the water mark on your, so called, original.

Proof sources or GTFO

Another pic with the same trunks just below the same painting in the background with the same floor... watermarked by, yep, you guessed it....
 
Last edited: