Re: New bipod? Rock Creek, GG&G or Harris
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Speeddog</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I've got a GG&G heavy duty pod on one of my "tactical" bolt guns. It's a fairly heavy rifle which tended to flex a bit on its original Harris. I have Atlas bipods on my ARs and considered one for this rifle. Ultimately I simply thought I'd try something differen so I chose the GG&G. Their heavy duty pod is very well built, easy to deploy, very precise with tilt and pan, and has slightly longer legs than the Atlas (which I found useful for the large bolt gun). The legs deploy conventionally and do not have the 45 degree option that the Atlas has which may be a consideration but was not on this gun. GG&G also have a series of mounting adaptors that allow it to be fitted to almost any platform. It worked out well for this rifle and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to anyone.
There is one caveat: the heavy duty pod is about as expensive as an Atlas so you'll have to take that into consideration.
To my eye, its the old buy once-cry once. I think the Atlas or the GGG would be the way to go
</div></div>
Well said. I have an Atlas set up on my AR10 right now but strongly considered the GG&G. Still might pick one up and move the Atlas to a bolt gun.
I think if you buy from a quality, trusted and proven company, you won't be disappointed; be it AccuShot, GG&G, Harris, Rock Creek, Versa Pod, etc. All have something different to offer and all have their own nuances but in the end, all of them will serve admirably.
That said, I prefer my Atlas on a bolt gun rather than a gas gun. On the AR10, the legs have to be extended a couple notches due to the taller profile and taller magazines. Not a huge issue, but it loses some of it's rigidity and doesn't feel quite as solid. For this purpose, the GG&G may be better suited but YMMV.