Re: New Stick , M40 Copy .....................
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mjh</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I never mentioned buying a Green redfield scope for $150, I mentioned what the correct scopes were, the one you were bidding on is not even close. Theres plenty of Redfield scopes out there that will look the part,that is not one of them. As for my copy, thats all it is, I am still looking for that elusive 40X base and I suppose it would be pretty close.
For you viewing pleasure, please excuse the gloss Redfield accurange with fine crosshairs as its not correct scope but done in a pinch,nor is the rounded off Redfield base, was waiting for the Wichita swivels when I took this picture.
</div></div>
And I see you have a period correct Harris Bi-Pod on there , Nice work . Your gun is far from perfect , but none the less very nice . Your in a glass house throwing stones , so , you've lost some street cred .
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was just wondering why you referred to it as an "M40 Copy" and when questioned about its components not being correct you got obnoxious with anyone not stroking your ego? </div></div>
Well Denny, seems the person questioning the components , is , just as i thought , throwing CRAP . Why ?? They dont have a " Perfect copy " yet claim it is and ask for a gimme on the scope . So, I tossed some crap right back to the bi-pod, non correct scope crap stirring person . Think I have an attitude problem ?? Well maybe some have a perception problem .
You did post some top notch info , and I say Thank you for it ( did I not ) .Now , mjh , is in my book throwing crap , with his half baked " COPY " , which I say is good enough for me to see as a " Copy" because of the effort he put into it . Yet I get no respect for trying from him , so mjh , like my gun for what it is or , stfu . You'll never see a harris on my M40 . I dont think Gunny Hathcock had a harris .
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mjh</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I never mentioned buying a Green redfield scope for $150, I mentioned what the correct scopes were, the one you were bidding on is not even close. Theres plenty of Redfield scopes out there that will look the part,that is not one of them. As for my copy, thats all it is, I am still looking for that elusive 40X base and I suppose it would be pretty close.
For you viewing pleasure, please excuse the gloss Redfield accurange with fine crosshairs as its not correct scope but done in a pinch,nor is the rounded off Redfield base, was waiting for the Wichita swivels when I took this picture.

And I see you have a period correct Harris Bi-Pod on there , Nice work . Your gun is far from perfect , but none the less very nice . Your in a glass house throwing stones , so , you've lost some street cred .
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was just wondering why you referred to it as an "M40 Copy" and when questioned about its components not being correct you got obnoxious with anyone not stroking your ego? </div></div>
Well Denny, seems the person questioning the components , is , just as i thought , throwing CRAP . Why ?? They dont have a " Perfect copy " yet claim it is and ask for a gimme on the scope . So, I tossed some crap right back to the bi-pod, non correct scope crap stirring person . Think I have an attitude problem ?? Well maybe some have a perception problem .
You did post some top notch info , and I say Thank you for it ( did I not ) .Now , mjh , is in my book throwing crap , with his half baked " COPY " , which I say is good enough for me to see as a " Copy" because of the effort he put into it . Yet I get no respect for trying from him , so mjh , like my gun for what it is or , stfu . You'll never see a harris on my M40 . I dont think Gunny Hathcock had a harris .