Wouldn't the movement also impact clip-on performance since this isn't collimated?Sorry, I should clarify: The mount that we designed with American Defense consists of two pieces - 1. A dovetail/picatinny combo that mounts to the body of the Micro and 2. A reversible double-sided throw lever mount that stays on the rifle, similar to the FTS mount. The reason the American Defense mount won't work with the FTS mount is because the picatinny rail section won't clear the hinge on the FTS (see below).
You can put a K-Clip on the stock rail for the Micro, which can work for helmet mounting, but your alignment will be off for weapon mount and clip-on use.
In a clip-on configuration, the minor movement from the FTS mount shouldn't be an issue, but it can result in a significant shift in a stand-alone weapon sight configuration.
True, but how many commercial clip ons are designed properly? Zero. Not one.
Thanks for the response, but I still call BS.
That's very nice work. I didn't get it before. Can you do the nox next
Can you run it with the battery to the inside next to a 14 or is it a top and bottom like the nox.
irayusa.com 
2x pretty much rules out helmet mounting IMO, which takes away from what I would want it for (all in one unit)RICO MICRO 384 12 Micron 25mm Multi-Purpose Monocular
The RICO MICRO Series is an advanced electro-optic device miniaturized to deliver remarkably versatile functionality: Handheld, helmet mount, and weapon mount.
Curious how the 384 sensor would compare? Just by looking at specs the only difference is narrower FOV (10.5deg x 7.9deg). Lends me to believe it would be worse as a head mounted unit but might have similar performance as the 640 (with smaller FOV)?
Anyone played with the 384 version yet?
ETA: Just saw the base mag on the 384 is 2x. Not sure how that plays into everything other than throwing holds off in the scope
If im not mistaken the RL isnt clip on capable. Im pretty sure that will mean it doesnt have the poi adjustment like the RH. Rich can confirm, im just guessing.RICO MICRO 384 12 Micron 25mm Multi-Purpose Monocular
The RICO MICRO Series is an advanced electro-optic device miniaturized to deliver remarkably versatile functionality: Handheld, helmet mount, and weapon mount.
Curious how the 384 sensor would compare? Just by looking at specs the only difference is narrower FOV (10.5deg x 7.9deg). Lends me to believe it would be worse as a head mounted unit but might have similar performance as the 640 (with smaller FOV)?
Anyone played with the 384 version yet?
ETA: Just saw the base mag on the 384 is 2x. Not sure how that plays into everything other than throwing holds off in the scope
MH25:
| Optical Magnification | 1.1X |
| Digital Magnification | 8X |
| Housing Material | Aluminum / ABS / Copper / Glass / Germanium |
| Objective Focal Length | 25mm |
| Objective Diameter | 25mm |
| Objective F# | 1.0 |
| Objective Focusing Range | 2 meters to infinity |
| Horizontal Angular Field of View | 17.5 |
| Vertical Angular Field of View | 14 |
You would be correct in that statement. The MH25 is the better option for helmet mounting. This unit is for those that want a mini thermal that can be helmet mounted, has a better housing construction (metal as opposed to polymer), and is weapons rated.
It's crazy! Some would say you will need two commie units to have the same reliability as one American unit and they might not be wrong. But a recoil rating and 5 year warranty fixes that question for all but those who will be using this for targets that shoot back...
So the chinese company infiRay owns iRay USA?
Yes it does look better in person. Getting through-the-eyepiece footage from a clip-on is difficult. The ambient light, especially in the first video when it was still daylight, caused some interference which reduced the contrast a bit. The auto exposure on the GoPro created some bloom on the brighter objects in the image, which may have caused them to look fuzzy.
See it's kinda like this.
Would you say the micro is berry compliant?
iRay USA's "about" page shows a very close relationship to the Chinese mothership... Perhaps i asked the wrong question with the word "own".
Not only that, Texas has minimal domestic tax so you limit the dollars given to our clowns too!
Where does one find your mount?Not compatible with the FTS mount, but the mount we designed is better IMO. Much more solid and repeatable if using as a standalone weapon sight.
Also, Surgeon_Shooter is the man and my hero.
This is definitely not my area of expertise, but doesn't the Berry Amendment specifically pertain to things like clothing/textiles, food and tools?
It will be available through all authorized iRay USA dealers. I know there are at least a few on this site - Sure Shot Night Vision, O'Neill Ops DownRangeThermal, Thermal Optics Plus...
The RH25 Micro is “berry good” for the money
Sorry for the delay man. I’m down with the flu. Started getting better yesterday and I’m dying again today. If I survive I’ll get a video I promise. Not to mention we have an inch of ice on everything outside right now. Here’s this for the time being….
