No good deed

I don’t know anything about the incident, and don’t recall any news on it. After reading the article, I dont understand what was done wrong? The fact that there were tourists there, or that the rescue was unsanctioned?
 
Yeah, the people going to tour the volcano weren’t properly warned about the dangers of touring volcanoes. :mad: They assumed, because a guide was willing to take them there, that it wasn’t going to erupt. (y) Which makes sense, because anyone looking at history can see man generally has a pretty good idea when volcanoes are going to erupt :unsure:...

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Almost as poorly written as the NYT. If I've parsed it out correctly, in this case the "rescuers" in this case were also the employers and hosts who placed everyone at risk in the first place. Their problem is all the people in their employ who did not get saved as well as the burns and injuries of those who did get saved.

Also based on my guesswork this "work safe" is like our OSHA, and the penalties are basically fines for unsafe work conditions.

Right or wrong just a cost of doing business.
 
If people die or get hurt someone is going to get sued. Like said above this is due to the tour company dropping them off there. I would feel pretty damn obligated to go get them, and wouldn't feel like a hero about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diverdon
Most of the rescuers were from different companies than the one leading the tour. They are charged for risking their own lives to save others whom they did not put in harm's way--worker safety violation. Part of the issue is that the government response was mia, thus the rescuers made the government look bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean the Nailer