The Jews that rejected Jesus as the Messiah are not any different than a Buddhist, Muslim or an atheist. All of the people from those groups meet the same end; an eternity in hell. The Jews that reject Jesus will spend eternity in hell just like someone who claims to be a Baptist, Methodist, Mormon or Catholic.
I will agree that there is a difference between a Zionist and a Jew. However, there are some people who fit both groups. IMHO, there are more people that are Jewish blended with Zionistic attitudes.
If it weren't for Zionism then there probably wouldn't be any Jews in Israel today. Which is a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
At one time the Democrats had the best interest of the United States in mind just as much as Republicans and/or Whigs. All those parties considered themselves Americans. That's not true today but I bring up that example from history to illustrate my point. There were some democrats that were also true Americans but it didn't make all democrats true Americans. There are some Zionists that are Jewish but not all Zionists are Jewish.
Read the book of Revelations. One purpose of the seven year tribulation period is to get the attention of the Jews so they accept the Messiah that they continue to reject.
Even if I am entire wrong on option #1 we would be in worse trouble if we picked the other two options.
You don't get any argument from me. There's things that the Israelis do that I disagree with and would also point out (if I were President) to them, that if they continue to do will only result in souring relations.
The USS Liberty is a really good example of what the Israelis did that was really bad. If I were President back then, I would have come down hard on them for that. Which doesn't mean withdrawing support.
I've been learning a lot of things recently about our WW2 ally, Great Britain, lately. They were not the best ally that we or the French could have during WW2.
They did some pretty despicable things regarding the French Resistance during the war. That's a complicated discussion but suffice it to say that the SOE sacrificed a lot of men and women that stood up to the Nazis just to satisfy Stalin.
Roosevelt and the OSS probably knew what they did and that was just as bad. The problem for us back then was what would happen if we discarded Great Britain. We couldn't. Keep in mind that Germany declared war on us not the other way around.
I didn't want to open on the can of worms on European politics in WW2 but that is best analogy that I can come up with now.
I don't like having any country embedded in US politics, finance, education and media. That goes for Israel.
There is nothing wrong with selling weapons, monitoring human rights and having trade agreements.
I don't think it's forced dualism. Even if it was, there are so many times in our individual lives when we are "forced" into "duality." Just ask any man who has to be "nice" to his ex-wife who's the queen of cunts just so he can see his kids without going to court to do it.
I bring up the previous example of WW2. The Soviets were a "cold war" enemy of the US even before WW2. Their espionage and assassination teams were as thick as fleas in the US. Both the Roosevelt and Truman administrations had so many agents that they were trying to recruit each other without knowing the other was a Soviet agent.
Yet we had no other choice during WW2. Remember that Hitler declared war on us, not the other way around.
