PortaJohn
- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
-
- Tags
They aren't worse, they're easier to pull off. An actual nuke would have to come from a state player which limits who we need to retaliate. A "dirty" bomb can be waste. Could come from a non nuclear state or a terrorist group. A bit harder to pinpoint who we need to turn into a glass parking lot.
Somebody is off their meds.
Your statement is pretty much on par with the whole flat earth theory.
It boils down to loyalty. One cannot serve two masters.
I don't know.
The ingenuity of man has no bounds.
Maybe right now as we speak someone is sitting in some undisclosed location building his own personal nuclear tipped ballistic missile.
30 miles from my house a cache of 70 sage brush sandals were found that were radiocarbon dated to 12,000 years ago
Where are these people now?
If you see the nation as your master and you as it's slave, well you do you.
I'm assuming if it's a legit find, somebody has started up a scientific paper on it.
I'd need to read the whole story and the findings of experts who studied it, before I could chance to make any informed guess about the matter.
Exactly, however I digress but possibly just possibly if this is in fact true question is where did these people come from?
Paisley caves, Fort rock caves
Paisley caves, Fort rock caves
Read "The Radioactive Boyscout". A kid built a breeder reactor in his back yard in the mid 90's. Interesting but nowhere close to an actual Nuclear weapon. Dirty is very localized. It's a regular explosion with a radioactive element. A nuke is a star being born in your city. Both very bad, but totally different.
You're being obtuse. It's a figure of speech. You can pledge allegiance to only one. When it gets to the nut cuttin' you'll fight, or die for one and only one.
Would actually have been easier 60 years ago if you knew how. The necessary materials are very tightly controlled and tracked the entire world over now. It's not that rogue states can't figure it out, it's that even as a government they can't get the materials.
The necessary materials are controlled by who?
Are the potentiality of the materials controlled by a single independent man/nation?
Or controlled by alienable human ingenuity?
Are the potentiality of the materials controlled by a single independent man/nation?
Or controlled by alienable human ingenuity?
Oh, they aren't controlled by good people... They're controlled by our government, the U.N., NATO, Hillary.... basically the nation's that are already in the nuclear weapons club. If you're a member you're good but they aren't accepting new members.. unless of course you can give their useless son a job on a board of directors for a gas company or some such...
Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
Ivermectin is a macrolide antiparasitic drug with a 16-membered ring that is widely used for the treatment of many parasitic diseases such as river bl…
www.sciencedirect.com
Highlights
•
Ivermectin effectively suppresses the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells and promotes cancer cell death at doses that are nontoxic to normal cells.
•
Ivermectin shows excellent efficacy against conventional chemotherapy drug-resistant cancer cells and reverses multidrug resistance.
•
Ivermectin combined with other chemotherapy drugs or targeted drugs has powerful effects on cancer.
•
The structure of crosstalk centered on PAK1 kinase reveals the mechanism by which ivermectin regulates multiple signaling pathways.
•
Ivermectin has been used to treat parasitic diseases in humans for many years and can quickly enter clinical trials for the treatment of tumors.
It only gets to be a problem if groups of peoples that you are a part of happen to be directly fighting, which is not that common these days.
If that happens, generally speaking, give it a bit of time and once the Global Elites, the bankers, the politicians and the Arms Dealers have all had their fun and the money runs out, or one side gets the stuffing beaten out of them and has to fold, chances are things will go back to being at peace and the propaganda will flip from drumming up hatred to saying that it's wrong to be hating others because of their national origin. (Exactly the history of wars and peace in our good old USA).
So in the mean time you'd have to pick to either stay out of it (which may or may not be possible), or fight for the side you believe is right, to help liberate the other group from their evil & oppressive leaders.
Wars are for the most part about rulers and elites fighting other rulers and elites and the common folk are the ones who get ground into the dirt and die for the vanity and profit of the rulers and elites.
I'm just referring to allegiance to one country, or another, particularly when serving as an elected official, helping to make domestic and foreign policy, as Mehmet Oz wants to do. He should make a choice, in my opinion. There should not be any question of where his loyalty lies. He should be all in, 100%, or not at all. He cannot be loyal, but to one.
It's a lesson hard learned ordinary people are nothing but canon fodder
The constitution doesn't say he has to only have one citizenship, so he is free to do as he wishes, and you are free to disagree with his choice. The voters in his state didn't seem to think that was a big problem for them. If they did, they are welcome to vote for someone else.
That's a whole different thread...
People that understand that "Vote Red" vs. "Vote Blue" is still voting for the same stooges of the global elites, probably understand that only being a citizen of one country makes a politician no more loyal to that country's interests than one that happens to have more than one citizenship.
Yeah they came from Asia. So maybe you haven't studied history too much.
You are correct. I disagree and believe that all elected officials should be 100% American, no multi-citizenship.
I'm well aware of where they are said to have come from, however in their case, they came over possibly up to 10,000 years ago depending on which experts you read, so that's a bit different from a bunch of pale faces and Asians and Africans that started pouring in 300 or so years ago, with most arriving in 200 or less years ago, who then proceeded to turn the local population into a persecuted minority.
Said to have come from huh
Where do you think they came from, spaceship?
They also persecuted and committed genocide against each other.
We got here and were better at it. I'm failing to see why I should feel guilty about it. To the victor go the spoils.
You're obviously the participation trophy type. Thank you for participating in this thread, your trophy's in the mail.
The original question was about this country being founded on immigration. This is bs. The people that founded this country were natives, i.e. they were all born here (but were “subjects” of the Crown). Immigration was allowed under controlled conditions. No where is it the basis of establishment of this country. Section 1 of the 14th Amendment was meant to insure that freed slaves were recognized as citizens but was never meant to allow illegal immigrants to come here and have babies which are then “citizens” of the United States and therefore eligible for a welfare check sent back to China, Mexico or wherever they came from. And as for “native Americans”, Europeans were here 20,000 years ago, long before they were. But you probably don’t know about that.
I need screens big enough to see the fish smiling
Amazing invention...
Romney should hang this portrait in his office.
who is this "we" you refer to? I didnt do anything....to any body. i did not have anything to do with slavery, i didnt have anything to do with genocide on the natives. i was born well after the people that did that shit.
i strongly suspect YOU didnt do any of that, either.
Media frenzy over Putin's latest "cleansing of society" with Stalin and Hitler being invoked.
It just keeps getting better every day.
It just keeps getting better every day.
I hope they both suffer and have as many complications as possible , and have a slow agonizing path straight to Hell
They are wasting the air we breathe.
You are going off on a tangent completely unrelated to the issue.
At no point was anyone discussing any "guilt".
"Said to have come from" is an accurate way of stating assumed migrations patterns of peoples 10,000+ years ago as there is not much in the way of actual records so most is from archaeological and genetic research. There are different competing theories as to the exact migration patterns and time tables.
You could debate about what kind of humaniod or other branches of human type creatures might have been on this continent 20,000 years ago.
But to describe them as "Europeans" in the same way "Europeans" have been thought of for the past 2000 years + is probably not accurate.
Any tribes of human type beings that were around 20,000 years ago would have been very far removed from our current ideas of races/cultures/nationalities. They may not have genetically been the same kind of modern humans that are predominant today.
You are trying to argue as fact and claim superior knowledge about things that are very much up for debate / research and not clearly settled in any manner.
Lara Logan is dropping truth bombs!
Last edited:
Speaking of fraud, waste, and abuse...
Here in Amman, Jordan and saw this fancy plane sitting out there..
those UN folk are definitely "going green" with their private jets.
Here in Amman, Jordan and saw this fancy plane sitting out there..
Still want to know if the "extras" were for presidential candidates alone or if there was down balloting too, esp. Congress.
