PortaJohn

  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r and Mwalex
84ZpzlhIzHBz.jpeg
 
I'm totally down with that as long as the wall gets built and we get control of the border. Cheaper in every way imaginable to create a pathway to citizenship for people who have lived their whole lives here illegally. Just not without completely controlling the border, period.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: there is a big difference in the illegals that came over 10+ years ago and have worked to assimilate into their local communities versus the entitled ones that have come over in the past 3.5 years. I can tell you which are which with just a limited observation. But if you have to make rules that abide for all...
 
You mean eugenics?
OK - in fairness I just got off the phone with a mouth breather....it was a hot take, and very shortly thereafter I reminded myself that I am not Bill Gates.

Nature has a way of regulating this phenom - where one individual is 2 or 3 deviations outside of the group - they died. Society has provided cradle to grave assistance. Particularly as it relates to immigration.........Consider the ideals of society and the social contract all pivot off of the intellectually capabilities of the citizen body. Yes, there should be a test and a standard.

I will also say that euguenics gets a lot of press as a negative thing. People really ought to understand while eugenics is a concept that has been black brushed by association with the Nazi party, or M Sanger; historically many groups have used that concept both internally and externally, as well as the concept of diaspora to their advantage. It is the concept in play with open borders.
 
Last edited: