• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

PortaJohn



Oh my. Makes me think of all the pre 2020 threads here, where so many screechers were shouting down people like me.
I have known about the dangerous vaccine pandemic for about 25 years or so, give or take.
Back when you had to go to a library for moat information.
Dr.
Leonard
Horrowitz
 
eWaE03ssFZcO.jpeg
 
Oh my. Makes me think of all the pre 2020 threads here, where so many screechers were shouting down people like me.
I have known about the dangerous vaccine pandemic for about 25 years or so, give or take.
Back when you had to go to a library for moat information.
Dr.
Leonard
Horrowitz
I have always been amazed by the people that will take a live virus as a vaccine.
 
Old news.
BtDt twice now.
Zip accross the border at Progresso, buy meds, get free margarita, go to the giant mexican Kroger, walk back accross the bridge.
Declare you have BP meds and antibiortics. Don't try to bring narcotics accross and everythingvis easy peasy.
i had friends that used to go across for ulcer medicine, before the "experts" admitted they had been wrong for decades about ulcers.
 

Even the PCR test for SARSCOVID-2 was approved via Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).


“The EUA process does not include classifying tests into traditional categories, such as CLIA waived or FDA cleared, and EUA is a temporary designation that is usually discontinued once the PHE is declared over. It should be noted that the studies performed by laboratories and manufacturers to define the performance characteristics for EUA tests are less stringent than those required of an IVD test. Studies for EUA submission primarily focus on analytic sensitivity (i.e., limit of detection) and analytic specificity (i.e., cross-reacting organisms). Under EUA, clinical trials to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity are not required due to the novelty of the pathogen and the absence of both reference methods and a clearly defined disease state.”
 
Oh my. Makes me think of all the pre 2020 threads here, where so many screechers were shouting down people like me.
I have known about the dangerous vaccine pandemic for about 25 years or so, give or take.
Back when you had to go to a library for moat information.
Dr.
Leonard
Horrowitz
Wut vaccination ? :unsure: :rolleyes::(
 
Wut vaccination ? :unsure: :rolleyes::(

This story is 20 years old. A lot of what gets posted here is out of date.

The same video is at the link below


In 2006, CBS News reported that despite a significant increase in the percentage of seniors getting flu shots – from 15% to 65% over two decades – the death rate among the elderly did not decrease as expected. Instead, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially.

In 2005, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu vaccines were beneficial to the elderly. The study, published in JAMA, was covered up but Sharyl Attkisson, at the time an investigative journalist for CBS, aired a report on it in 2006.


Attkisson revisited her investigation in her blog in 2015. She said the study emphasised how these vaccines might kill lives instead of saving them. While the researchers wanted to prove that the pressure on mass flu vaccination would save the world, they were “surprised” that the data did not support their assumption at all. The data actually shows that the number of deaths in the elderly increased after vaccination: 60 percent of people aged 65 and over have an enormously increased risk of death if they get the flu shot.