PortaJohn

#158,605
theLBC said:
maybe if your "diversity" wasn't raping and killing them?

Click to expand...

When people hide their agenda behind minority rights we must assert strongly that:

- Yes, minorities should be protected from the mob (That's why we have a Constitutional Republic and not a Democracy)

- But minorities do not deserve special rights or privileges over the majority. (No DEI favors for rape and other violence)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hermosabeach, BytorJr and MWAlex2
#158,607
Nh3PVUMdM2Pv.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: hermosabeach, Longshot231, Samuel Whittemore and 4 others
#158,609
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost231, jbrand11, Expert684 and 2 others
#158,619
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Samuel Whittemore and theLBC
#158,623
Defiantly_Not_Bender said:
Click to expand...

Used to be a fan of ML...no longer. He speaks with forked tongue.

The other guy speaks so fast if one were to type this sentence the way he sounds it would be: theotherguyspeakssofastifoneweretotypethissentence..... Fast talker, says a lot of words, means nothing. NEVER liked him. Candice is much the same way...I think the word for this is "grifter."
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoDopes, plong and mtrmn
#158,626
BytorJr said:
Used to be a fan of ML...no longer. He speaks with forked tongue.

The other guy speaks so fast if one were to type this sentence the way he sounds it would be: theotherguyspeakssofastifoneweretotypethissentence..... Fast talker, says a lot of words, means nothing. NEVER liked him. Candice is much the same way...I think the word for this is "grifter."
Click to expand...
Yeah I listened to Mark Levin a lot until he was promoting Uk support and telling everyone it was OK to take the clotshot. Turned that crap off and never went back. Never had anything for the fasttalker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lightning8 and BytorJr
#158,629
  • Like
Reactions: Milf Dots and Samuel Whittemore
#158,632
BytorJr said:
I wonder how this works now with concealed carry. Florida was very much of the mindset of "no printing" whatsoever years ago. I wonder if this helps the case in case you find yourself where printing or a peak is seen?
Click to expand...
i think open carry most places is just dumb. it says "shoot me 1st". i also think that the right to do is is so basically consistent with the 2nd amend that any denial of that right is just more gov control games.
i do like it for the reason that women will be able to carry on body with a bit less problem. not having to carry off body,which is often a big problem.
face it,young women who have things to show like to show them. been that way for awhile. carrying now will still be hard but not nearly so. look at pics of many victims of serious crime by goat fuckers and wet backs. many young attractive women. those looking for the armed folks,criminals and cops, are less likely to notice an armed woman even when gun is not totally under cover. also gets the weight off a carrying person by pigs that try to catch printing,which did happen,esp when CCP started.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Eunozs and Emerson0311
#158,635
MWAlex2 said:
Florida Congressman Brian Mast has authored or sponsored several bills related to Israel and U.S. foreign policy, most recently the "Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act," and a controversial passport provision in the State Department Authorization Act.
"Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act" (H.R. 23)
  • Purpose: This legislation, reintroduced by Mast and Rep. Chip Roy in January 2025, is intended to protect U.S. citizens and allies, including Israel, from investigations by the International Criminal Court (ICC).
  • Key Provisions:
    • It would impose sanctions, such as visa revocations, on ICC officials who seek to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute American citizens or officials from allied nations.
    • According to Mast, the bill sends a clear message to the ICC that interfering with Israel's right to self-defense will have consequences.
  • Status: A similar version of this bill passed the House in the previous Congress.
Controversial passport provision
  • Purpose: In September 2025, Mast included a provision in a larger State Department authorization bill (H.R. 5300) that would have allowed the Secretary of State to revoke or deny passports to people deemed to have provided "material support" to a foreign terrorist organization.
  • Controversy:
    • Civil liberties advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union, criticized the provision as vaguely worded and susceptible to abuse, potentially criminalizing political speech and dissent.
    • The concerns came in the context of Secretary of State Marco Rubio's actions against foreign nationals for anti-Israel commentary.
  • Status: Following public backlash and criticism, the controversial provision was withdrawn from the bill by Mast.
Other related legislation
The user's query may also be referring to several other recent bills related to U.S.-Israel relations and security that Mast has supported or that have been active in Congress:
  • Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act: Multiple versions of supplemental appropriations bills have been passed by Congress to provide military and security assistance to Israel.
  • Israel Security Assistance Support Act: This bill, passed by the House in May 2024, compels the delivery of approved defense articles and services to Israel and aims to prevent the executive branch from withholding aid.
  • National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA): The FY2025 NDAA includes millions for Israeli security aid, such as funding for missile defense programs and cooperation on emerging technologies.
  • United States-Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025: This bill seeks to expand and deepen U.S.-Israel defense cooperation on emerging technologies, including counter-drone systems.

Some additional information on the bill, what has happened and other bills that are concerning
Click to expand...
sucks that this came from reps in my state. but so did the Zionists Rubio,Bondi and Noem. Trump too for that matter. Israel seems to have control of him with not much limit.1 of many provisions that should be considered is providing material support to a terrorist organization. our gov supports the terrorist organization Israel with billions of $ of free money and weapons every year. does the DOJ sanction the DOD and dept of state. be fun to watch that show.
 
#158,636
  • Wow
Reactions: Milf Dots
#158,638
mosin46 said:
i think open carry most places is just dumb. it says "shoot me 1st". i also think that the right to do is is so basically consistent with the 2nd amend that any denial of that right is just more gov control games.
i do like it for the reason that women will be able to carry on body with a bit less problem. not having to carry off body,which is often a big problem.
face it,young women who have things to show like to show them. been that way for awhile. carrying now will still be hard but not nearly so. look at pics of many victims of serious crime by goat fuckers and wet backs. many young attractive women. those looking for the armed folks,criminals and cops, are less likely to notice an armed woman even when gun is not totally under cover. also gets the weight off a carrying person by pigs that try to catch printing,which did happen,esp when CCP started.
Click to expand...
Oh, @mosin46, I completely agree. I’d only open carry in my yard doing yard work. It’s a complete disadvantage IMO…see the guy with the gun, take him out first. Sure, it is faster (for me anyway) to draw from holster OWB, but no OC for me. I was mainly thinking “printing”. I never had an issue with that in FL, though one time at an “off-license” I bent over to look at some Dogfish head and the guy said….ummmm…hey…FYI…you’re showing. I was like…oops…sorry. Next thing I know he’s showing me his new (at that time) Walther PPS (paddle). We laughed and he said, good to know when you’re here, my level of security goes up a notch.

But as I recall the rules, FL is very much a no print whatsoever state. So I guess I was wondering if that new OC law makes the printing less of an issue with a CWP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
#158,640
Samuel Whittemore said:
Pam Bondi is compromised. What a disgrace

Click to expand...

Yes, as disgusting as it is, GOVERNMENT cannot go after people for “cheering” or whatever. That is their right as a citizen of the USA. Now, employers, can certainly terminate - like they did for folks against the clot shot claiming religious exemption and still got canned. Sucked, was morally bankrupt, but in they eyes of 1A was legal except companies who do gov’t contracts that were told to terminate folks who did not comply…at that point IMO, the 1A was breached. Still a private business, and that forcing private business to do the gov’t bidding is very definition of Fascist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLEE and mosin46
#158,642
BytorJr said:
Oh, @mosin46, I completely agree. I’d only open carry in my yard doing yard work. It’s a complete disadvantage IMO…see the guy with the gun, take him out first. Sure, it is faster (for me anyway) to draw from holster OWB, but no OC for me. I was mainly thinking “printing”. I never had an issue with that in FL, though one time at an “off-license” I bent over to look at some Dogfish head and the guy said….ummmm…hey…FYI…you’re showing. I was like…oops…sorry. Next thing I know he’s showing me his new (at that time) Walther PPS (paddle). We laughed and he said, good to know when you’re here, my level of security goes up a notch.

But as I recall the rules, FL is very much a no print whatsoever state. So I guess I was wondering if that new OC law makes the printing less of an issue with a CWP.
Click to expand...
fair ? we prob have to wait for a ruling. seems to my non lawyer brain that open carry = printing writ lg. we shouldn't have to worry about printing since CCP is no longer needed,sounds like showing,not showing with open carry none of it matters. it shouldn't and never should have. 2A and all that. wonder if you can carry your slung AR into wally world ? do you even have to carry a HG in a holster? open in hand? gonna be the usual law rat fuck i bet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BytorJr
#158,643
BytorJr said:
Yes, as disgusting as it is, GOVERNMENT cannot go after people for “cheering” or whatever. That is their right as a citizen of the USA. Now, employers, can certainly terminate - like they did for folks against the clot shot claiming religious exemption and still got canned. Sucked, was morally bankrupt, but in they eyes of 1A was legal except companies who do gov’t contracts that were told to terminate folks who did not comply…at that point IMO, the 1A was breached. Still a private business, and that forcing private business to do the gov’t bidding is very definition of Fascist.
Click to expand...
she's never been anything but a deep state power enhancer. seems to me 1A says you can say anything about anything with the exception of defense against slander. that what you say offends Christians,Jews,Muslims,atheists,gov anything is protected. porn,insulting humor and hate speech esp important as you don't get to choose what is said,just what you decide to listen to. but 1A is just as dead as 2A and the other 8 as well.,esp 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BytorJr
#158,644
Milf Dots said:
I have little doubt the hate speech AG Pam Bondi is speaking about is actual calls to violence, and not the 'hate speech' dems call "speech they don't like".
Click to expand...
might be a legit thought but will bet that it really means speech they don't like,esp coming from Bondi the deep state enforcer. the admin likely want's you to believe that but don't take a long odds bet on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BytorJr
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lowlight
Heads Up, Scammers in the wire
Replies
32
Views
2K
Milf Dots
Milf Dots
alexj-12
Introducing Quick Shot Challenges
Replies
0
Views
3K
alexj-12
alexj-12
Lowlight
One Year of Hide.TV
Replies
3
Views
300
sirhrmechanic
sirhrmechanic
Lowlight
Call to Action : Scout Sniper Heritage Foundation
Replies
1
Views
496
Redmanss
Redmanss
Death From A Distance
Dem lawmakers say their voters are threatening 'blood' and 'violence' over inability to hinder Trump: report
Replies
91
Views
4K
Kamerad
Kamerad
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts