Re: Precision Rifle Soulutions Rests
longrange30,
Yes the pan/tilt has a larger bearing surface to mount to but for what I have encountered in the shooting community for rest, spotting scopes, cameras, video, and LRF's it has not been an issue. The pan/tilt head and ball head will both accomplish the task and typically the difference is appreciated as shooters preference. The pan/tilt allows you to lock in one plane vertical or horizontal while allowing the other to move. For instance if you wanted to pan an area for targets you lock in the tilt where you want it and leave the pan loose. There are a couple advantages of the ball head over the pan/tilt that some like, the ball head is a one lever adjustment allowing for quicker set up and ability to tune the rest or optic with one adjustment with infinite possibilities. The ball head is much more forgiving when it comes to uneven set up where the pan/tilt is restricted to operating within a linear plane horizontal or vertical and best suited for level ground or bench type work. The ball head on the other hand does not have a true pan free ability and to allow the optic or shooting cradle to pan freely you back the ball head assembly off the threaded post that attaches the ball head to the leg assembly. This works well but if you do not insure that the ball head is loose enough to cover the target area you could tighten it down while panning right and not reach your right lateral limit as the head tightens down on the tripod. Another feature of the ball head is that it allows whatever is attached to the head to be rotated 90+ degrees from vertical which can help lower the profile of the optic being used. Again it boils down to user preference and the situations and environments you will be using the tripod in. Feel free to call me (281-541-1549) if you have any questions or would like further explanation of the virtues of each set up.
Hope this helped answer your questions.
Take care,
Danel