Maggie’s psychology of anti gun people article

[usmc02xx]

Raging Against Self Defense: A psychiatrist Examines The Anti-Gun Mentality, By Sarah Thompson, M.D.

rana cross that earlier today. enjoy

 

[Greg Langelius *]

The psychology of the antigun male by Julia Gorin.

Ran across this while looking into C&R.

 

[usmc02xx]

The psychology of the antigun male by Julia Gorin.

Ran across this while looking into C&R.

you always come across neat stuff. But do you really want to be known as a cruffler?

 

[Sniper Uncle]

Very interesting reading. Should be more widely published----even required reading for "educators."


Cheers,
Tim
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Shall NOT be Infringed

 

[Chemguy]

Interesting reading. Thanks for the links.

 

[Greg Langelius *]

you always come across neat stuff. But do you really want to be known as a cruffler?

...Enhhh; I'm still thinking that one over...

Greg

 

[PhulesAu]

this is the poster that should accompany the article.

 

[Limedust]

An interesting, but scientifically vacant, agenda piece. One expects better from an MD than conjecture masquerading as a peer reviewed essay.

 

[usmc02xx]

An interesting, but scientifically vacant, agenda piece. One expects better from an MD than conjecture masquerading as a peer reviewed essay.

i kind of had the same feeling. interesting but had a lot of cheerleading in it.

 

[JoeZ]

An interesting, but scientifically vacant, agenda piece. One expects better from an MD than conjecture masquerading as a peer reviewed essay.

How? Please explain as I've read these same thoughts from other articles and if they are flawed I wish to know why and not simply that you disagree.

 

[TNT]

How? Please explain as I've read these same thoughts from other articles and if they are flawed I wish to know why and not simply that you disagree.

There is no rigor in the analysis. We blame the anti-gun crowd for wild conjecture with no proof or convincing reasoning behind it. This seems to be in the same vein. Though I do tend to agree with some of the points, I won't go touting it as gospel until I can back up the claims. Here's a taste test you can use when someone tells you something. Say, "show me." If they can, then it's probably legit. I kid you not, those two words have started and stopped more multimillion dollar endeavors than I would care to count.

 

[usmc02xx]

How? Please explain as I've read these same thoughts from other articles and if they are flawed I wish to know why and not simply that you disagree.

in a lot of the statments he went from facts to conclusions that werent based upin the facts he just cited. Also, the general tone of the article itself seemed to be cheerleaderish.