Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch Out for Scammers!
We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!
The site has been updated!
If you notice any issues, please let us know below!
The chicks dig it factor! LOL. I guess the larger foot print of the rings helps hold the scope. I've never had a problem with regular ol' steel badger rings though.
Yea I haven't had any issue running the thin badger rings either and the only reason I went with the 6/4's this time is all I could find in stock in the right Seekins flavor.
Not sure if Seekins makes a simrad attachment but didn't see one on their site so would think not as their site was just updated. They probably followed the design as there was a demand for it from people seeing the design on military rifles and wanting it on their rifles.
The most basic reason behind the 6/4 vs. 4/4 cap screws is due to the increased surface area of the forward ring which in turn gives you more clamping force/hold on your optic (especially useful for lighter rifles with heavier recoiling calibers). Most folks I see that run the 6/4 combo rings run them: a) because its OEM for certain mil-spec rifles (i.e. - the SIMRAD attachment point/ring cap that Rob01 previously mentioned); or b) purely for looks.
Seekins rings are so well made that there is more than ample clamping force just about any rifle/optic combo I have used with the 4/4 rings, even on extremely heavy recoiling rifles, but the 6/4 rings are just as excellent if you can't source the 4/4 rings in a pinch and they do "look" cool and give you just a little more juice when needed/wanted.