New world record set for longest sniper kill in Afghanistan - Wichita Military Affairs | Examiner.com
wondering what kind of gear these guys use for telemetry?
wondering what kind of gear these guys use for telemetry?
Idk for sure but seems bogus. Just seems too vague to be an actual report.
wondering what kind of gear these guys use for telemetry?
Well, if the round landed close the kinetic energy could have kicked up a lot of debris or rock and that could shred the fuck out of someone. Just watch Frank trying to hit out to 2000, and he's probably as seasoned as they get. So hard to say.
Not what I meant... I meant the actual report seems fake not that the shot is not possible. I'm sure that shot could happen whether it be skill or luck.
This article is so 2012. Funny, I had my M82 out last night at 843 yds with some sweet Talon re-man ammo and couldn't get consistent hits worth shit. If the Barrett's long heavy trigger pull isn't good enough, at least it has a sloppy action, articulating barrel, wobbly bipod, and light weight monopod to make up for it. Throw in some mil-spec ammo, and you've got a real recipe for ELR disappointment. The reason the Barrett carries the SASR designation is it is not able to routinely hold 1 MOA. So at 2800 M groups will likely be in excess of 30" (or worse if you're using Talon re-man, lol), and probably require somewhere in the neighborhood 200 MOA of comeup ( even at 10K ASL) and probably would have been subsonic almost 1/2 its flight path. The rumor of this shot is what prompted the guys at DTA to recreate this shot with the HTI .375 CT in December 2012. And while the DTA crew had remarkable success, the difference between the .50 BMG and the .375 CT is like a '73 Caddy, to a corvette, and the M82 is more like a garbage truck and the HTI is more of a McLaren. I stand by my past observation that the M82 is great for crowd pleasing and bachelor parties, but not for real long range work.
No offense but you're mentality in the stereotypical one of people who don't really understand the Barrett and what it is capable of. I don't really hold it against you because I was once a member of that group and the vast majority go my peers are also still in that group.
While you are particular referring to the M82 almost everyone (at least from what I've seen) it running the M107 now, similar but the same. Either way I'll address the some of the issues you have posted
1. Ammo: I'm not sure about the quality of "Talon" remanufactured but it sounds like the worst. The Barrett it a picky eater, if you feed it shit ammo then it's going tell you to eat a big o'l bag of baby sized dicks. Mk211 is the only thing I've found that I know the 107 will preform with (about 1.2-1.5 MOA depending on the lot) but good luck finding that. Bottom don't feed it shit if you are expecting it to preform.
2. Trigger pull: I'll agree with you there. No shit I just had a nightmare last week about trying to shoot bad guys with that super long creep trigger pull, I got them in the end but woke up in a cold sweat. Yeah it's no Jewell but it's actually pretty decent compared to a stock M4.
3. Articulating barrel/action: Yes, surly winner of the worse design for a precession weapon...ever. That said I could probably write a book on how to shoot a Barrett but I have neither the time or energy to do that tonight. Simply put to shoot a Barrett to its full capabilities an arcane art but it can be done.
4. Bipod/monopod: I've never really had much to complain about other that don't ever take that sucker off and expect to be able to re assemble it in the hide at 0200 in the pitch black of night. As for the monopod I don't know of anybody who uses it, a regular old sand sock does wonders. The monopod is just extra weight in my opinion and counter intuitive to long range shooting.
5. Hot barrels: although you didn't talk about I'll bring it up. The barrel on the Barrett is relatively thin and heats up fast and general after 10-15 rounds of sustained fire will start to sting round vertical...badly...like 3-4 MOA bad.
So when you sit down behind the Barrett one needs to keep these in mind, because just one and or any combo of the other the previously things I just talked about will blend into a perfect storm of "the Barrett in the worst piece of shit gun ever".
No offense but you're mentality in the stereotypical one of people who don't really understand the Barrett and what it is capable of. I don't really hold it against you because I was once a member of that group and the vast majority go my peers are also still in that group.
While you are particular referring to the M82 almost everyone (at least from what I've seen) it running the M107 now, similar but the same. Either way I'll address the some of the issues you have posted
1. Ammo: I'm not sure about the quality of "Talon" remanufactured but it sounds like the worst. The Barrett it a picky eater, if you feed it shit ammo then it's going tell you to eat a big o'l bag of baby sized dicks. Mk211 is the only thing I've found that I know the 107 will preform with (about 1.2-1.5 MOA depending on the lot) but good luck finding that. Bottom don't feed it shit if you are expecting it to preform.
2. Trigger pull: I'll agree with you there. No shit I just had a nightmare last week about trying to shoot bad guys with that super long creep trigger pull, I got them in the end but woke up in a cold sweat. Yeah it's no Jewell but it's actually pretty decent compared to a stock M4.
3. Articulating barrel/action: Yes, surly winner of the worse design for a precession weapon...ever. That said I could probably write a book on how to shoot a Barrett but I have neither the time or energy to do that tonight. Simply put to shoot a Barrett to its full capabilities an arcane art but it can be done.
4. Bipod/monopod: I've never really had much to complain about other that don't ever take that sucker off and expect to be able to re assemble it in the hide at 0200 in the pitch black of night. As for the monopod I don't know of anybody who uses it, a regular old sand sock does wonders. The monopod is just extra weight in my opinion and counter intuitive to long range shooting.
5. Hot barrels: although you didn't talk about I'll bring it up. The barrel on the Barrett is relatively thin and heats up fast and general after 10-15 rounds of sustained fire will start to sting round vertical...badly...like 3-4 MOA bad.
So when you sit down behind the Barrett one needs to keep these in mind, because just one and or any combo of the other the previously things I just talked about will blend into a perfect storm of "the Barrett in the worst piece of shit gun ever".
Hey Ro, ever since your earlier post I've had a couple of questions, maybe you can help me out.
While I may not, "really understand the Barrett and what it is capable of", thanks for not holding it against me. From what you say about the Barrett being a "picky eater" and that "MK211 is the only thing I've found that I know the 107 will preform (perform right?) with (about 1.2-1.5MOA)", wouldn't that support MY position that a minimum group size of 30" of vertical dispersion, let alone any horizontal deflection, would make a successful shot at 3080 yds against a AP target pretty unlikely?
I'm glad we agree that the trigger on the Barrett is shit. I was saddened to learn though that the shitty-ness of the trigger was causing you nightmares. It was however a relief to learn that even when you were sleeping you, "got them in the end". Whew! For the record though, speaking for my M82, and my M4gery, the Barrett's trigger is NOT "pretty decent" comparatively, it is still a piece of shit. Your nocturnal emissions not withstanding.
Again, I'm glad that we seem to agree that the articulating barrel, and action of the M82 are some of its limiting factors in its accuracy. However, I stick by the distinction that the M82 is NOT a "precession weapon" (precision, right?), and that is why it carries the SASR designation. I'd love to read your book on "how to shoot a Barrett" and I'll be sure to buy it if you do choose to write it later tonight. Until then, I'm going to fall back on my training on the M82, conducted by the guy who did write the book on Barretts, for Barrett, Jon Weiler. And while Jon never referred to effectively employing the Barrett as an "arcane art" as you suggest, he did talk extensively about the strengths (power, capacity, rapid follow up shots, and payload ammunition) and the weaknesses (size, weight, lack of precision, etc.) of the system so that the user could understand its limitations.
Fortunately for me, I've never had to, "re assemble it (the bipod) in the hide at 0200 in the pitch black of night." However, in my opinion, the lack of a tensioning mechanism on the bipod (similar to a pod-lock, say) is a distinct disadvantage in stabilizing the rifle. Even with all its weaknesses though, I've never thought that "the Barrett in the worst piece of shit gun ever", it's just different, and optimized for a different use than most others.
I was still hoping to hear your insights on the reality of the rumored shots by the Australians, especially as it relates to minimum group size given the best ammo/gun/met/env conditions vs. the target size at 3K+ yds. Also, in your experience, what's the probability of making any shot when dialing/holding 2.5-3 DEGREES of elevation, having a subsonic flight of somewhere around 20 percent of the total distance, and a 6 second flight time? Lastly, I was hoping you could settle a debate I was having with my friend Gecko45, what color IS the boathouse at Hereford? Thanks, Walt