OK - here is one for this season since most of the failure to ignite inconstancies happen in cold conditions
this is what I am finding: a powder that is faster ( so should ignite easier ) is showing slow ignition / ignition failures with the same primers vs. a slower powder with a higher density charge
ie:
2 different years, both times around 20 F
338 LM 87 gr R22 win magnum primer slow or no ignition -- when 95 gr R 25 / same primer is fine
338 LM 85 gr H4831 SC CCI mil primer - no ignition ( scorched powder ) --- when 102 gr of R33 / same primer is fine
any one else concur that when you are around 100% case fill, the failure to ignite the powder problems are less
I think if I could find the hotter Fed magnum primers it might be a cure
the 338 LM is apparently at the edge of being able to use a LR primer
I am understanding why the 50 BMG needs that big ass primer, especially with the common load of slow ball powder
this is what I am finding: a powder that is faster ( so should ignite easier ) is showing slow ignition / ignition failures with the same primers vs. a slower powder with a higher density charge
ie:
2 different years, both times around 20 F
338 LM 87 gr R22 win magnum primer slow or no ignition -- when 95 gr R 25 / same primer is fine
338 LM 85 gr H4831 SC CCI mil primer - no ignition ( scorched powder ) --- when 102 gr of R33 / same primer is fine
any one else concur that when you are around 100% case fill, the failure to ignite the powder problems are less
I think if I could find the hotter Fed magnum primers it might be a cure
the 338 LM is apparently at the edge of being able to use a LR primer
I am understanding why the 50 BMG needs that big ass primer, especially with the common load of slow ball powder
Last edited: