Someone sent me a message on the President's threat to veto a bill that bans trannies from participating in women's sport. Below is my reply that some of you might find interesting. On that email thread were quite a few ladies. So far, none of them have replied. It's a bold assumption on my part but I don't expect any of them to reply.
For once I agree with something that President Poopy Pants wants to do. Women wanted "equal rights" without equal responsibilities and equal sacrifices. Well now, they got it.
They made their own bed so let them lay in it.
Ever since I was a young boy I've had to stomach the bovine excrement from feminists, lesbians and libtards about whether a woman should be permitted to do ANYTHING a man can do. If that hypothesis is true and if equal rights are to be recognized for all thesexes genders then men must be able to have it both ways as well.
I've often joked about declaring myself a woman so I could grapple with ladies on the wrestling mat but never dreamed someone would have the (expletive deleted) to do it!
I wonder how many of the women now complaining about lost awards and opportunities ever bothered to speak out for the discrimination we men have endured for decades.
Not only have I had to listen to the shrieking banshee bitches bawl for "equal rights," I've suffered from lost promotions, job opportunities and awards because someone without a (expletive deleted) and was blessed-in-the-chest got the placement above me.
Keep in mind these women and minority men were not as qualified as I was and didn't have the experience in my field. Nor was their performance any better. I was discriminated against because I am a white man.
For the over two decades I spent in a military uniform I had to listen to the Rambettes complain about being excluded from a combat MOS (Military Occupational Specialty). The split-trail soldiers screamed for their "right" to serve in combat. Yet, I had to run faster, do more sit-ups and pushups for the PT test than they did.
On my first day of military service, they shaved my head. The question usually came up about why heads were shaved. The answer was that it was because of sanitary necessity.
Oh really? So they were implying that women were cleaner than men.
Whoever said that has never had to do janitorial duty in a women's restroom. Yours's truly has had that dubious honor and I can state with a great degree of scientific certainty that a man's aim is better than a woman's. Ladies, I think some women can possibly levitate but need more practice with hovering and bomb releases.
The issue isn't about anyone having a right to serve in combat. The question should be, who can be COMPELLED to serve in combat? A few years ago, several men in Texas sued the Federal Government saying that the Selective Service System was discriminatory because only men were forced to register; not women.
The case made it all the way to the SCOTUS who refused to grant a Writ of Certiorari. It takes four justices to grant certiorari. That's how many leftist justices were on the SCOTUS. Not one voted for certiorari. If the leftists had their panties on fire for women's "equal rights" then why didn't they vote to hear the case?
I don't know who tacked on the amendment but the language to require women to register for the Selective Service was removed from the last National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Where were the feminists with their burning bras to support the amendment to the NDAA?
Don't talk to me about supporting "women only" sports until they have to be forced into harm's way. If the government can draft fathers, sons and brothers they can draft mothers, daughters and sisters.
The Ukraine is begging for fighting personnel. Where are the virtue-signaling feminists? Why aren't they volunteering to fight in the Ukraine? That country, by the way, is letting women leave but not military aged men.
By the way, I will give a thousand dollars to the first feminist that can protest for "women's rights" in Afghanistan and make it out alive. Which brings me to the next point. Why aren't women fighting back at the Taliban? It's because they aren't strong enough.
Some of the more liberal-minded women might counter the strength argument with a statement like "women can't fight the Taliban because they have all the guns."
That's a good point. Now remember that when you vote for anything that's anti Second Amendment. Wouldn't it be nice to have the same weapons that Poopy Pants gave the Taliban?
If some of you are still reading, then you might be agreeable to a draft for both sexes but want to carve out an exemption for mothers and pregnant women. Whoa now! Let's hold on to your IUDs. Let's not get hasty about this now!
What about those exemptions? There are millions of men that would love nothing more than to be full-time dads and see their ex-wives go off to war. My ex-wives were worse than any rag-headed terrorist I've ever seen. At least you can negotiate with the terrorists! Let some of the mothers leave the children with the fathers while they go off to war.
If they had to be drafted and the exemption existed for mothers they would be popping babies out faster than a gumball machine with kids lined up full of nickels in their pockets.
Women in this country like to chirp like budgies on steroids that they are "strong and independent" or "stunning and brave." All that chirping stops when the check for dinner arrives, they have to open a jar, change a flat tire or walk into divorce court.
Then they are the weak, mild, victimized little girls who can't fend for themselves. They demand (and get) the house, savings and half of the man's retirement. Even worse is that they get the kids.
Don't tell fathers like me to man up and be a dad. We've tried only to be overruled by lying women and female judges. We've been locked out of our children's lives. Then they turn into little LGBTQ freaks with purple hair, more ink than a Bic pen factory and metallic facial ornaments.
Most despicable is a woman's evil penchant for lying as fast as they will hop in the sack with another baby-daddy to get their way in front of a judge. And it's usually a female judge. Need I say more? Over two thirds of divorces are initiated by women. Why? It's because they know they can win.
It's usually the women who vote for libtard democrats that protect the sex offenders and pedophiles. The breasted banshees cry for compassion and mercy because the poor little kiddy-fiddlers were molested themselves. I've been robbed, beaten and lied to. I didn't like it then and won't do that to anyone else. So why does a victim turn around to be the victimizer?
So why do the flashing perverts on Main Street get a pass? Why are the rapists given probation instead of a cell in the State Penitentiary complete with a horny Bubba that has a hairy back? Why do Children's Protective Services send children back to child molesters? It's all because women have voted for the lawmakers and judges that promote that evil.
Watch the videos of "Drag Queen Story Time." Take a count of who the parents are. It's the mothers that are promoting that evil. If the fathers had their way we could make stoning great again and stop exposing innocent children to Satan's spawn in spandex.
So talk to me about "women's rights" when they have to register for the draft. Talk to me about "women only" sports when child support and alimony are abolished. Talk to me about the need to "protect" women after the 19th amendment to the Constitution is repealed.
With all that said, I doubt that I would ever intervene if I saw a tranny with a bulge as big as a soccer ball in his crotch walk into a women's restroom.
I can hear some of you ladies calling me a coward and lacking chivalry. It's not that. If a man like me were to intervene the tranny would be on the ground, bleeding and carried away with a sheet over his head.
Why don't the women stand guard, armed and ready by the door to the ladies' room? Why won't the women stand up and face a grand jury when they are charged with murder, assault or violating someone's "civil rights" after they've taken care of the tranny problem? Go ahead ladies, let's see one of you face a jury after you've put a lead suppository up a tranny's butt.
Count me out for protecting women's sports. I'm going to watch the show with a big bowl of buttered popcorn.
For once I agree with something that President Poopy Pants wants to do. Women wanted "equal rights" without equal responsibilities and equal sacrifices. Well now, they got it.
They made their own bed so let them lay in it.
Ever since I was a young boy I've had to stomach the bovine excrement from feminists, lesbians and libtards about whether a woman should be permitted to do ANYTHING a man can do. If that hypothesis is true and if equal rights are to be recognized for all the
I've often joked about declaring myself a woman so I could grapple with ladies on the wrestling mat but never dreamed someone would have the (expletive deleted) to do it!
I wonder how many of the women now complaining about lost awards and opportunities ever bothered to speak out for the discrimination we men have endured for decades.
Not only have I had to listen to the shrieking banshee bitches bawl for "equal rights," I've suffered from lost promotions, job opportunities and awards because someone without a (expletive deleted) and was blessed-in-the-chest got the placement above me.
Keep in mind these women and minority men were not as qualified as I was and didn't have the experience in my field. Nor was their performance any better. I was discriminated against because I am a white man.
For the over two decades I spent in a military uniform I had to listen to the Rambettes complain about being excluded from a combat MOS (Military Occupational Specialty). The split-trail soldiers screamed for their "right" to serve in combat. Yet, I had to run faster, do more sit-ups and pushups for the PT test than they did.
On my first day of military service, they shaved my head. The question usually came up about why heads were shaved. The answer was that it was because of sanitary necessity.
Oh really? So they were implying that women were cleaner than men.
Whoever said that has never had to do janitorial duty in a women's restroom. Yours's truly has had that dubious honor and I can state with a great degree of scientific certainty that a man's aim is better than a woman's. Ladies, I think some women can possibly levitate but need more practice with hovering and bomb releases.
The issue isn't about anyone having a right to serve in combat. The question should be, who can be COMPELLED to serve in combat? A few years ago, several men in Texas sued the Federal Government saying that the Selective Service System was discriminatory because only men were forced to register; not women.
The case made it all the way to the SCOTUS who refused to grant a Writ of Certiorari. It takes four justices to grant certiorari. That's how many leftist justices were on the SCOTUS. Not one voted for certiorari. If the leftists had their panties on fire for women's "equal rights" then why didn't they vote to hear the case?
I don't know who tacked on the amendment but the language to require women to register for the Selective Service was removed from the last National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Where were the feminists with their burning bras to support the amendment to the NDAA?
Don't talk to me about supporting "women only" sports until they have to be forced into harm's way. If the government can draft fathers, sons and brothers they can draft mothers, daughters and sisters.
The Ukraine is begging for fighting personnel. Where are the virtue-signaling feminists? Why aren't they volunteering to fight in the Ukraine? That country, by the way, is letting women leave but not military aged men.
By the way, I will give a thousand dollars to the first feminist that can protest for "women's rights" in Afghanistan and make it out alive. Which brings me to the next point. Why aren't women fighting back at the Taliban? It's because they aren't strong enough.
Some of the more liberal-minded women might counter the strength argument with a statement like "women can't fight the Taliban because they have all the guns."
That's a good point. Now remember that when you vote for anything that's anti Second Amendment. Wouldn't it be nice to have the same weapons that Poopy Pants gave the Taliban?
If some of you are still reading, then you might be agreeable to a draft for both sexes but want to carve out an exemption for mothers and pregnant women. Whoa now! Let's hold on to your IUDs. Let's not get hasty about this now!
What about those exemptions? There are millions of men that would love nothing more than to be full-time dads and see their ex-wives go off to war. My ex-wives were worse than any rag-headed terrorist I've ever seen. At least you can negotiate with the terrorists! Let some of the mothers leave the children with the fathers while they go off to war.
If they had to be drafted and the exemption existed for mothers they would be popping babies out faster than a gumball machine with kids lined up full of nickels in their pockets.
Women in this country like to chirp like budgies on steroids that they are "strong and independent" or "stunning and brave." All that chirping stops when the check for dinner arrives, they have to open a jar, change a flat tire or walk into divorce court.
Then they are the weak, mild, victimized little girls who can't fend for themselves. They demand (and get) the house, savings and half of the man's retirement. Even worse is that they get the kids.
Don't tell fathers like me to man up and be a dad. We've tried only to be overruled by lying women and female judges. We've been locked out of our children's lives. Then they turn into little LGBTQ freaks with purple hair, more ink than a Bic pen factory and metallic facial ornaments.
Most despicable is a woman's evil penchant for lying as fast as they will hop in the sack with another baby-daddy to get their way in front of a judge. And it's usually a female judge. Need I say more? Over two thirds of divorces are initiated by women. Why? It's because they know they can win.
It's usually the women who vote for libtard democrats that protect the sex offenders and pedophiles. The breasted banshees cry for compassion and mercy because the poor little kiddy-fiddlers were molested themselves. I've been robbed, beaten and lied to. I didn't like it then and won't do that to anyone else. So why does a victim turn around to be the victimizer?
So why do the flashing perverts on Main Street get a pass? Why are the rapists given probation instead of a cell in the State Penitentiary complete with a horny Bubba that has a hairy back? Why do Children's Protective Services send children back to child molesters? It's all because women have voted for the lawmakers and judges that promote that evil.
Watch the videos of "Drag Queen Story Time." Take a count of who the parents are. It's the mothers that are promoting that evil. If the fathers had their way we could make stoning great again and stop exposing innocent children to Satan's spawn in spandex.
So talk to me about "women's rights" when they have to register for the draft. Talk to me about "women only" sports when child support and alimony are abolished. Talk to me about the need to "protect" women after the 19th amendment to the Constitution is repealed.
With all that said, I doubt that I would ever intervene if I saw a tranny with a bulge as big as a soccer ball in his crotch walk into a women's restroom.
I can hear some of you ladies calling me a coward and lacking chivalry. It's not that. If a man like me were to intervene the tranny would be on the ground, bleeding and carried away with a sheet over his head.
Why don't the women stand guard, armed and ready by the door to the ladies' room? Why won't the women stand up and face a grand jury when they are charged with murder, assault or violating someone's "civil rights" after they've taken care of the tranny problem? Go ahead ladies, let's see one of you face a jury after you've put a lead suppository up a tranny's butt.
Count me out for protecting women's sports. I'm going to watch the show with a big bowl of buttered popcorn.
