Going to have a us optics fdn 3x17 scope made and looking for suggestions in what reticle between Horus 59,H102 or tremor 3
shooting 6.5 creedmoor from a surgeon scalpel
I've been looking into the tremor 3 for some time. I've read most of the threads & comments about it & I'm not sure what to make of some of the explanations.
Guys often comment on the tremor being overly busy when compared to the H59 but, I just can't see that reasoning.
The tremor looks to me to be less busy than the H59 because the wind dots on the tremor break the reticle into distinct sections. All straight lines are Mil sub tensions & all dots are wind speed. There's no confusion & either one is easily ignored.
If you want to get a reasonably good feel for the tremor, there's a simulation on the Horus website which I've used many times.
In my mind it's a no brainer. The tremor is basically a H59 with dots overlaid. I've watched every review on guys using the tremor & nobody has reported that it doesn't function as claimed or that it's difficult to use.
The tremors use in PRS is steadily increasing because it just makes sense. The ability to apply wind adjustment in the reticle at any distance without the need for a specific ballistic reading is one less complication.
If you haven't used the simulation on the Horus website, my advise is to give that a whirl & see what you think.
Regards..............Barelstroker.