I've spent years around ex cons ex addicts and killers who turned their lives around, but what do I know right?
Apparently not enough to recognize meth spots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've spent years around ex cons ex addicts and killers who turned their lives around, but what do I know right?
I've seen plenty. My chest looks like that and I've never done any drugs.Apparently not enough to recognize meth spots.
he ought to bang her just because....lol
This Grosscrapper guy didnt exactly seem to be turning his life around. Burning and looting arent civic duties.I've spent years around ex cons ex addicts and killers who turned their lives around, but what do I know right?
But you’re bringing up points that have nothing to do with what I was talking about.This Grosscrapper guy didnt exactly seem to be turning his life around. Burning and looting arent civic duties.
Again, I'd love to see the argument. That requires analysis, break it down for me and explain how a private actor violated someone's civil rights. That means evidence and citations. Because without that, I don't see it.See my post, above.... The federal crime would not be the actual DGUs. It would be whether or not those DGUs violated the civil rights of those dispatched in those DGUs.
You're looking at this as an American with a constitution and rights, look at it as a Soviet citizen vs the secret police... we call them the FBI now, but whateverAgain, I'd love to see the argument. That requires analysis, break it down for me and explain how a private actor violated someone's civil rights. That means evidence and citations. Because without that, I don't see it.
But you’re bringing up points that have nothing to do with what I was talking about.
I was saying I’ve been around a lot of formerly very bad people, saying I’ve seen meth scars. I didn’t say anything about the 3 people shot, it was about the lady.
Dudes shitting on her and she’s a bystander in the situation that’s tryin to do something potentially good. I have no feelings about her one way or the other, but I’m also not going to just say she does meth because of scars/pimples and who she was dating. That’s just stupid, it’s not like she’s eat up with spots like most meth heads you see, it’s a couple spots in a somewhat grainy photo.
I have heard them talk and have listened to their bs. If some of them put as much work into staying clean and bettering themselves as they do looking for the next fix they could have a lot of potential and some succeed. Other people also experience things and people from other walks of life this isn’t something only you have experienced which is how what you type reads. Only you could truly know what’s up with people of questionable backgrounds no one else could possibly have experience in this....You should hear those people talk in group. They’re all so full of potential. Then they relapse and commit crimes. And when the cops get them they wanna save the world again. It’s a vicious circle for sure.
I wonder what her role in that deal was. The cops didn’t want to search anyone’s phone except for Rittenhouse.
All of Pulaski County has become a full blown dangerous place. North Little Rock has always been sketchy along Broadway through Rose City. I not only pack heat in Pulaski Co... I have protection really close.Teetering? I will direct you the movie "Gang Wars : Bangin' in Little Rock" (1994) and then I will direct you to the intersection of Asher and 12th! It wasn't long ago that a couple gang bangers were shooting at each other from opposite sides of University Ave. Hell, I found a tossed shotgun outside of Pipe and Tobacco right across from UALR about a year ago.
I hope you got a nanny cam...he ought to bang her just because....lol
that's cold................
Nice self fellatio, DZ, you so bad.The Supreme Court made Florida follow their own law. They are allowed substantial leeway in what law they make, but they weren't allowed to make up rules as they go along. They had to follow the rules they made, which their refusal to do so created a substantial federal question that the Supreme Court had to rule on to prevent a constitutional crisis.
If somehow in your head, without reading the opinion, without having any real knowledge on what happened, you formed some opinion that you think has some merit, good for you. But you don't get to just ignore the facts of a case just because 37L1 says so. Courts rule on ACTUAL controversies, not bullshit hypotheticals. I'm sure they didn't want to even opine on it, but realistically, they had to.
As to Binger, Binger ain't so bad. He's a bit amateurish but inexperience will do that to you. Everyone's frustration against Binger is just ignorance of the process. He's a good lawyer, but not a great one. He presented the case he had. And after watching four hours of Rittenhouse's testimony yesterday, it's clear to me why the jury acquitted. But the process doesn't allow Binger to interview Rittenhouse or know what he would say at trial until he has introduced enough evidence in court that it could go either way. He did that (which is why he won the inevitable motion for directed verdict/acquittal/whatever the hell they call it in Wisconsin). Then, after that, as I said all along, Rittenhouse testified, the reasonability of his actions was assessed by the jury (as the law requires), and he was acquitted. I'm glad you're such a genius that you could have predicted that all that in advance, without anyone taking the oath and facing the jury, but fortunately for all of us, we don't live in a world where you get to make that decision. The jury gets to decide and their decision, if unanimous, is final.
We live in a world where you get to pretend your "opinion" if I may call it that, is equal to my expertise. But long after you've forgotten about this case, I am going to continue doing what I have dedicated my life to doing. You base your opinion on watching, whereas I base mine on advanced education in the topic from some of the best in the business, followed by years of actually doing it. If you want to pretend those are equal, who am I to interfere with your little fantasy? That said, I'm not going to pretend like you watching is comparable to my doing. Because it isn't.
this won't be popular post but it's just a thought.
I was listening to some podcasts and what not. huber may have not known what was going on and stepped into a situation thinking he was "helping". He comes out of nowhere after hearing one side of the story being yelled down the road from what I saw.
This is in no way sticking up for him, I just think maybe he saw a gun and ran towards it without thinking and that was his mistake, it wasn't like the pedo hunting kyle down.
You see someone with a gun and don't know what's going on but you want to stop it, on the other side of the coin someone attacks you with a skateboard and tries to take your weapon, you're going to stop them.
Still self defense on KRs end eitherway. Homeboy stepped into something he didn't need to be in and it ended badly.
I think the girlfriend knows that IF that's the case.
Granted it's just a thought, maybe he was hunting down kyle I wasn't there. I'm not convinced of this, it's an opinion I've heard.
It’s certainly a possibility and is a risk that anyone takes in response to an active shooter situation. Nobody knows who is who, especially the cops when they respond. The Rittenhouse situation was a bit different but let’s use the one of the nightly club shootings in Chicago as an example. Say you are a good guy there minding your own business outside of the club and you hear shots and see people running out but you have your CC on you and you go running in to see what’s up. Once in you see the shooter and you pull and you shoot and cops arrive on scene about the same time. In their eyes, you are the active shooter at that time. That’s why you really should not ever go after a shooter. You should only pull if you or those right in your vicinity around you are in danger. Then you draw, put the threat down and re-holster immediately. Don’t ever go running after someone with your gun drawn. Hell we had a local off duty officer shot by his own people once because even tho he was a cop he did that very thing and when the uniforms arrived they had no clue who he was. They just know they were responding and seen a dude running through the mall with a gun. Luckily, he survived, I think. That was several years ago. But yeah that scenario and the Rittenhouse scenario was a shit sandwich no matter how you look at it. Kyles biggest mistake was probably being there that night. His second biggest mistake was leaving the pack. But you also have to look at all sides. Kyle was there and technically wasn’t doing anything wrong and had as much right to be there as anyone and once the shit started going down, he had no idea who was who running up on him either. All he knew was he had people beating him, chasing him and seen a gun and simply reacted. You can’t blame him for that. Again, that was a shit situation all around. It’s actually kind of amazing he wasn’t taken out by the cops he was running to.
This is the last two statements of the article.
“What going to happen now is racist people ... feel like they can go out there, pick a fight with you while you protest, and kill you and get away with it,” Newsome said in an Instagram post.
“This sets precedent ... You can go out there and you can kill (a protester), and you can get away with it.”
See what they are doing?
According to the last paragraph, they twisted the sh!t out of reality, then they project it into something that is far from what would actually happen. These F's, don't have one brain cell amongst the entire lot of them. Mac
If I was Kyle, I would not let that bitch come within a mile of me. Read the article. She's talking out of both sides of her mouth. On one hand, she says she has a lot of sympathy for him but also says he was looking for trouble and condemns the authorities for letting the "militia" in Kenosha on the night that her boyfriend got what he deserved.
She's pulling a PR stunt to make herself look good because everyone in the world knows that she was banging a scum bag. She's got to appear to be the sympathetic and grieving girlfriend that lost her soul mate.
There's also the possibility that the Marxist bitch would like to get close enough to Kyle to fill him with lead to finish the job her boyfriend couldn't.
Her comments about having sympathy for Kyle are as believable as the Easter Bunny.
Girlfriend of man killed by Kyle Rittenhouse has 'sympathy' for him
Hannah Gittings, 25, went to the protest with her boyfriend Anthony Huber because he was a friend of Jacob Blake, the black man whose police shooting triggered the unrest.www.dailymail.co.uk
I have heard them talk and have listened to their bs. If some of them put as much work into staying clean and bettering themselves as they do looking for the next fix they could have a lot of potential and some succeed. Other people also experience things and people from other walks of life this isn’t something only you have experienced which is how what you type reads. Only you could truly know what’s up with people of questionable backgrounds no one else could possibly have experience in this....
If you say that’s 100% meth, you’d definitely accuse me of it with my shitty skin and be very wrong in that case.
Her role may have been big, may have been small. She’s could have just been another lemming for the big guys. As far as I know, it hasn’t been talked about. She could just have been a sideline supporter don’t know.
In the end it all has nothing to do with her trying to potentially get closure for her a Kyle. She can’t be a total POS if she’s reaching out and really means what she’s said.
I wouldn’t go near her. She is likely to try to kill him for revenge. Or dox him. If that hasn’t already been done.
this won't be popular post but it's just a thought.
I was listening to some podcasts and what not. huber may have not known what was going on and stepped into a situation thinking he was "helping". He comes out of nowhere after hearing one side of the story being yelled down the road from what I saw.
This is in no way sticking up for him, I just think maybe he saw a gun and ran towards it without thinking and that was his mistake, it wasn't like the pedo hunting kyle down.
You see someone with a gun and don't know what's going on but you want to stop it, on the other side of the coin someone attacks you with a skateboard and tries to take your weapon, you're going to stop them.
Still self defense on KRs end eitherway. Homeboy stepped into something he didn't need to be in and it ended badly.
I think the girlfriend knows that IF that's the case.
Granted it's just a thought, maybe he was hunting down kyle I wasn't there. I'm not convinced of this, it's an opinion I've heard.
He knew his "comrades" were administering a beat down on an "enemy combatant" and he wanted his licks.Huber was a shitball with a penchant for assault on a female.
Get outta here with this bullshit.
I hope Kyle beats those guts, and then ghosts her.I think it’s simpler than that. I think she’s a good-digging crack-whore who sees a shit-ton of money coming Kyle’s way in the future, and she wants to be part of it.
I agree. If Kyle knows what’s best, he’s already burned her number, and put a restraining order on her, to keep her as far away from him as possible.
Honeytrap.
I hope Kyle beats those guts, and then ghosts her.
For anyone that still thinks LE and prosecutors aren’t politically motivated, ask yourself this, why isn’t the FBI investigating and charging the criminals who destroyed private property during the Kenosha riots at all, much less with the same vigor as they are going after January 6 protestors?
For anyone that still thinks LE and prosecutors aren’t politically motivated, ask yourself this, why isn’t the FBI investigating and charging the criminals who destroyed private property during the Kenosha riots at all, much less with the same vigor as they are going after January 6 protestors?
They can cooperate with local law enforcement. Very common practice. There have been several federal courthouses that have been damaged as well.
So, your position is that it was unlawful for the FBI to obtain surveillance video in Kenosha?
This was a point I made earlier.
They made drone footage.
No mass charges have come forth. Who the fuck were they really watching?
Because they don’t have jurisdiction.
Local police do. Sacramento BLM smashed up a whole bunch of stuff and the police didn't respond to 911 calls, they surrounded the capitol building instead. They did show up later along with the FBI to take all the surveillance footage and not one prosecution.
Policing is political, in big cities they are controlled by the leftists. Same for all the alphabet agencies.
Obviously a liberal, see‘s what he’s party does/doing and still a liberal…………
"protection really close" - what does that mean? You have access to phone in coverage of your person with an A-10 or C-130 Gunship? .All of Pulaski County has become a full blown dangerous place. North Little Rock has always been sketchy along Broadway through Rose City. I not only pack heat in Pulaski Co... I have protection really close.
Well, I’m not going to say “we” are the stupid ones, but the mass sheeple are!Not stupid...they know exactly what they are doing.
"WE" are the stupid ones.
Depends on who paid for you to be there to burn down a city.If a felon is at a riot isn't that a crime in itself?
Evidently not if they are serving a Democrat Brown-ShirtsIf a felon is at a riot isn't that a crime in itself?
Lmao!! I want that on a tee shirt.COMMIE bitches have crabs
Worth quoting, worth repeating, and worth 'getting it out there even more'....